DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28016] - mod_jk2 2.0.4 does not work with existing configuration
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28016. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28016 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OS/Version||All --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-17 23:06 --- Heads up: JK2 is going away. Switch to mod_jk. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28016] - mod_jk2 2.0.4 does not work with existing configuration
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28016. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28016 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-18 08:57 --- Thanks for the tip. I hope I'm not going to be told in 2 years that mod_jserve is the way to go ;-) As a side note, I'd advise you to make this obvious on Tomcat's web site: it still points to http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/jk2/index.html, which says, among others, that JK2 is a refactoring of JK and is much more powerfull. I've been fooled by that, and spent a long time getting mod_jk2 to work. Would be better to avoid the same mistake to others. I guess that bug report has no point anymore, and can be closed. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28016] - mod_jk2 2.0.4 does not work with existing configuration
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28016. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28016 mod_jk2 2.0.4 does not work with existing configuration [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|Normal |Major - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28016] - mod_jk2 2.0.4 does not work with existing configuration
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28016. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28016 mod_jk2 2.0.4 does not work with existing configuration [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|Major |Normal - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28016] - mod_jk2 2.0.4 does not work with existing configuration
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28016. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28016 mod_jk2 2.0.4 does not work with existing configuration --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-01 09:22 --- I'm behind a restrictive firewall, so I can't access CVS directly. I downloaded this snapshot: http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jakarta-tomcat-connectors_20040401052212.tar.gz And built it successfully with VC98, against Apache 2.0.49, using Ant 1.6.1. I replaced the working mod_jk2.dll by the one just built, without changing anything to the configuration (that is, there was no load balancing stuff, since it was not supported with that older mod_jk2). Restarted Apache (net stop/net start), and the problem is still present, though it evolved slightly. In those tests, the URLs all should display the same index.jsp file interpreted by Tomcat. mod_jk2 2.0.3-dev (October 2003): http://URL/ - works http://URL/index.jsp - works https://URL/ - works https://URL/index.jsp - works mod_jk2 2.0.4: http://URL/ - works http://URL/index.jsp - works https://URL/ - returns the source of index.jsp https://URL/index.jsp - returns the source of index.jsp Now: http://URL/ - works http://URL/index.jsp - works https://URL/ - WORKS! https://URL/index.jsp - returns the source of index.jsp Getting better, not quite there yet, unless there are some more fixes in the CVS that are not yet in the snapshots. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28016] - mod_jk2 2.0.4 does not work with existing configuration
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28016. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28016 mod_jk2 2.0.4 does not work with existing configuration --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-01 07:23 --- There was some change in jk2 code commited yesterday. Thanks to check with latest HEAD and close the bug if it's fixed - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
