RE: [5.0] Getting some defaults from system properties

2003-11-13 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Howdy, Seems like a reasonable increase in configuration flexibility without introducing backwards compatibility issues nor user confusion. +1. Yoav Shapira Millennium ChemInformatics -Original Message- From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003

Re: [5.0] Getting some defaults from system properties

2003-11-13 Thread Glenn Nielsen
Couldn't these be set using the DefaultContext? Regards, Glenn Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, This is a little similar to the Ant-like properties for server.xml. The problem: the allowLinking and caseSensitivity flags of FileDirContext, which can be set per context using the Resources element,

Re: [5.0] Getting some defaults from system properties

2003-11-13 Thread Remy Maucherat
Glenn Nielsen wrote: Couldn't these be set using the DefaultContext? Why not ? It seems like a better fit. Remy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [5.0] Getting some defaults from system properties

2003-11-13 Thread Glenn Nielsen
Remy Maucherat wrote: Glenn Nielsen wrote: Couldn't these be set using the DefaultContext? Why not ? It seems like a better fit. In what way? Having one method to configure defaults for Context's seems better than having multiple methods. And keeping the configuration of these in server.xml

Re: [5.0] Getting some defaults from system properties

2003-11-13 Thread Remy Maucherat
Glenn Nielsen wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Glenn Nielsen wrote: Couldn't these be set using the DefaultContext? Why not ? It seems like a better fit. In what way? Your way. Remy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

Re: [5.0] Getting some defaults from system properties

2003-11-13 Thread Glenn Nielsen
Oops, I misread your reply. :-) Glenn Remy Maucherat wrote: Glenn Nielsen wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Glenn Nielsen wrote: Couldn't these be set using the DefaultContext? Why not ? It seems like a better fit. In what way?