Re: 5.0.21 ?

2004-03-30 Thread Remy Maucherat
Remy Maucherat wrote: I did post a message on the PMC list asking for a final word on our binary dependencies (installer + JMX). I'm also wondering if it whould be a good idea to pick up the latest Jasper fixes in a 5.0.21 tag. I got approval from Geir (the PMC chair) to ship with MX4J and the

RE: 5.0.21 ?

2004-03-30 Thread Mladen Turk
From: Remy Maucherat I got approval from Geir (the PMC chair) to ship with MX4J and the installer. So there will be a new 5.0.21 tag today, with new binaries :) That's really good news. Hope it'll last for a while :) MT.

Re: 5.0.21 ?

2004-03-30 Thread Remy Maucherat
Mladen Turk wrote: From: Remy Maucherat I got approval from Geir (the PMC chair) to ship with MX4J and the installer. So there will be a new 5.0.21 tag today, with new binaries :) That's really good news. Hope it'll last for a while :) BTW, are there any new procrun binaries for this build ?

RE: 5.0.21 ?

2004-03-30 Thread Mladen Turk
-Original Message- From: Remy Maucherat So there will be a new 5.0.21 tag today, with new binaries :) That's really good news. Hope it'll last for a while :) BTW, are there any new procrun binaries for this build ? Bill did some bug fixes and updates, but I'm afraid he

Re: 5.0.21 ?

2004-03-30 Thread Remy Maucherat
Mladen Turk wrote: Bill did some bug fixes and updates, but I'm afraid he didn't done any jtc/procrun binary builds. I can do that but only later this evening. I can wait until later today for new binaries, no problem. Rémy - To

Re: 5.0.21 ?

2004-03-30 Thread Peter Lin
hurray!!! that is good to hear. peter Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: I did post a message on the PMC list asking for a final word on our binary dependencies (installer + JMX). I'm also wondering if it whould be a good idea to pick up the latest Jasper

RE: 5.0.21 ?

2004-03-30 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Informatics -Original Message- From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 5:38 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: 5.0.21 ? Remy Maucherat wrote: I did post a message on the PMC list asking for a final word on our binary dependencies (installer + JMX

RE: 5.0.21 ?

2004-03-30 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, Ok. Yes, I heard about that. I think it should be in jakarta-tomcat-5 instead, BTW. The CVS module doesn't matter as much as the fact NOTICE (and LICENSE) need to end up in the top-level directory of our distribution when it's unpacked. From where does the build dist take the

Re: 5.0.21 ?

2004-03-30 Thread Remy Maucherat
Shapira, Yoav wrote: Ok. Yes, I heard about that. I think it should be in jakarta-tomcat-5 instead, BTW. The CVS module doesn't matter as much as the fact NOTICE (and LICENSE) need to end up in the top-level directory of our distribution when it's unpacked. From where does the build dist take the

RE: 5.0.21 ?

2004-03-30 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, It's jakarta-tomcat-5. OK, will put there. So what kind of statements go in NOTICE ? Short, for example: Regular expression support is provided by the PCRE library package, which is open source software, written by Philip Hazel, and copyright by the University of Cambridge, England. The

RE: 5.0.21 ?

2004-03-30 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Developers List Subject: RE: 5.0.21 ? Hi, It's jakarta-tomcat-5. OK, will put there. So what kind of statements go in NOTICE ? Short, for example: Regular expression support is provided by the PCRE library package, which is open source software, written by Philip Hazel, and copyright

Re: 5.0.21 ?

2004-03-30 Thread Bill Barker
Are you using commons-daemon-1.0 or HEAD for jsvc? There is also a fix for a nasty bug with jsvc in the CVS. - Original Message - From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 4:42 AM Subject: Re: 5.0.21 ? Mladen Turk