Are you using commons-daemon-1.0 or HEAD for jsvc? There is also a fix for
a nasty bug with jsvc in the CVS.
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 30,
0, 2004 9:56 AM
>To: Tomcat Developers List
>Subject: RE: 5.0.21 ?
>
>
>Hi,
>
>>It's jakarta-tomcat-5.
>
>OK, will put there.
>
>>So what kind of statements go in NOTICE ?
>
>Short, for example:
>
>"Regular expression support is provided by t
Hi,
>It's jakarta-tomcat-5.
OK, will put there.
>So what kind of statements go in NOTICE ?
Short, for example:
"Regular expression support is provided by the PCRE library package,
which is open source software, written by Philip Hazel, and copyright
by the University of Cambridge, England. Th
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Ok. Yes, I heard about that. I think it should be in jakarta-tomcat-5
instead, BTW.
The CVS module doesn't matter as much as the fact NOTICE (and LICENSE)
need to end up in the top-level directory of our distribution when it's
unpacked. From where does the build dist take the
Hi,
>Ok. Yes, I heard about that. I think it should be in jakarta-tomcat-5
>instead, BTW.
The CVS module doesn't matter as much as the fact NOTICE (and LICENSE)
need to end up in the top-level directory of our distribution when it's
unpacked. From where does the build dist take the LICENSE/NOTI
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Note that we must properly reference MX4J and NSIS in our NOTICE file
for this release. I see the file (in jakarta-tomcat-catalina/NOTICE)
hasn't changed since I created it a month ago. If no one beats me to
it, I'll make the changes later today.
Ok. Yes, I heard about that.
m Research Informatics
>-Original Message-
>From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 5:38 AM
>To: Tomcat Developers List
>Subject: Re: 5.0.21 ?
>
>Remy Maucherat wrote:
>> I did post a message on the PMC list asking for a fin
hurray!!!
that is good to hear.
peter
Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> I did post a message on the PMC list asking for a final word on our
> binary dependencies (installer + JMX).
> I'm also wondering if it whould be a good idea to pick up the latest
> Jasp
Mladen Turk wrote:
Bill did some bug fixes and updates, but I'm afraid he didn't done any
jtc/procrun binary builds.
I can do that but only later this evening.
I can wait until later today for new binaries, no problem.
Rémy
-
To
> -Original Message-
> From: Remy Maucherat
> >>So there will be a new 5.0.21 tag today, with new binaries :)
> >
> > That's really good news.
> > Hope it'll last for a while :)
>
> BTW, are there any new procrun binaries for this build ?
>
Bill did some bug fixes and updates, but I'
Mladen Turk wrote:
From: Remy Maucherat
I got approval from Geir (the PMC chair) to ship with MX4J
and the installer.
So there will be a new 5.0.21 tag today, with new binaries :)
That's really good news.
Hope it'll last for a while :)
BTW, are there any new procrun binaries for this build ?
Rém
> From: Remy Maucherat
> I got approval from Geir (the PMC chair) to ship with MX4J
> and the installer.
> So there will be a new 5.0.21 tag today, with new binaries :)
>
That's really good news.
Hope it'll last for a while :)
MT.
--
Remy Maucherat wrote:
I did post a message on the PMC list asking for a final word on our
binary dependencies (installer + JMX).
I'm also wondering if it whould be a good idea to pick up the latest
Jasper fixes in a 5.0.21 tag.
I got approval from Geir (the PMC chair) to ship with MX4J and the
i
13 matches
Mail list logo
