De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: jueves 2 de mayo de 2002 5:16
For me is controversial to have a document at jakarta, that affirms that
prior to webapp, mod_jk was unmaintained, mainly because we have
maintained itall the time.
Costin, Henri, Dan , Larry , Me, and
Ignacio J. Ortega wrote:
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: jueves 2 de mayo de 2002 5:16
For me is controversial to have a document at jakarta, that affirms
Speaking of having a document at jakarta, it isn't there yet.
And it won't go live unless everyone
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: jueves 2 de mayo de 2002 15:44
Speaking of having a document at jakarta, it isn't there yet.
And it won't go live unless everyone likes it (think We are the
world as sung by a chorus of tomcat developers, all holding
hands,
-
From: Christopher K. St. John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 7:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries
Another update. Same disclaimers as before.
FAQ's (just
On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 23:43, Christopher K. St. John wrote:
think We are the
world as sung by a chorus of tomcat developers, all holding
hands, etc).
He, he, I like this one :-)
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL
rules all the way around),
Re: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries pier: There
were some other motivations when it all started... Mod_JK was
unmaintained, and nobody knew how to make it work. I didn't like
its design and took out the experiences I had while working
rules all the way around),
Re: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries pier: There
were some other motivations when it all started... Mod_JK was
unmaintained, and nobody knew how to make it work. I didn't like
its design and took out the experiences I had while working
Christopher K. St. John wrote:
Another update. Same disclaimers as before.
Mail client mishap, second one's a duplicate, sorry.
--
Christopher St. John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DistribuTopia http://www.distributopia.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: miércoles 1 de mayo de 2002 19:44
webapp
Re: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries pier: There
were some other motivations when it all started... Mod_JK was
unmaintained, and nobody knew how to make
On Thu, 2 May 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote:
I can admit all other reasons, but jk never has been unmaintained for
any period of time in the past, more, prior to webapp announce, or more
or less at the same time, Dan Milstein and Henri did a big work
documenting and studiying the sources,
Ignacio J. Ortega wrote:
Re: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries pier: There
were some other motivations when it all started...
Hmmm. The theory is that the document should be absolutely 100%
non-controversial. Other parts of the entry already emphasize ease
of use, so
The only limitation is that it support only 255 methods ( unless
we use an expansion ), since it has a byte as method code ( to
facilitate table-based dispatching ).
255 methods should be suffisant since we could have the
generic get/set property method ;)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Ok, I'm maybe being thick here, but I want to make sure I've got this
straight. The idea is that anyone who's clueful enough to search the
archives is likely to come across the term AJP14, so it's best to
give them a hint (even if term isn't going to mean anything to somebody
who just wants to
mod_jk and mod_jk2 do not work properly with Apache 2.0.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: Pascal Forget [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 5:24 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: jakarta-tomcat-connectors documentation/summaries
mod_jk and mod_jk2 do not work properly with Apache 2.0.
--
To unsubscribe
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Christopher K. St. John wrote:
Ok, I'm maybe being thick here, but I want to make sure I've got this
straight. The idea is that anyone who's clueful enough to search the
archives is likely to come across the term AJP14, so it's best to
give them a hint (even if term
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Pascal Forget wrote:
mod_jk and mod_jk2 do not work properly with Apache 2.0.
mod_jk works fine with Apache2.0 - at least the CVS HEAD.
If someone has the time, we should replace/update the .tar.gz
we distribute, that version has a bug that was fixed.
Costin
--
To
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Pascal Forget wrote:
mod_jk and mod_jk2 do not work properly with Apache 2.0.
And mod_jk2 is not yet supposed to work ( since it's not even
alpha ).
But it does :-)
Costin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
The following document is very incomplete, and in many
cases factually incorrect. The idea is to post it now, while
it's obviously in draft form, get feedback, and then clean it
up and publish it wherever would be most useful (jakarta-tomcat
connectors page, or the Tomcat FAQ)
I'm currently
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Christopher K. St. John wrote:
mod_jserv
where to get the source:
java-jserv repository
I would recommend jakarta-tomcat, the version there has been tested
the most with tomcat ( there are no significant changes AFAIK ).
unerlying protocol:
AJP11
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: lunes 29 de abril de 2002 0:04
mod_jk
web servers:
domino
apache 1.3
apache 2.0?
netscape
others?
AOLServer ( not in the main tree ).
IIS
webapp
web servers:
Christopher K. St. John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following document is very incomplete, and in many
cases factually incorrect. The idea is to post it now, while
it's obviously in draft form, get feedback, and then clean it
up and publish it wherever would be most useful (jakarta-tomcat
Ignacio J. Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
webapp
web servers:
apache 1.3
others?
Apache2. I think they got IIS and iPlanet - don't know what level
of support.
When webapp got support for IIS? I think webapp has got a win32 build
for apache, not IIS support
23 matches
Mail list logo
