Bojan Smojver wrote:
Sounds good (although I have to admit I haven't compiled mod_jk from CVS
for a while).
Just take a look, cvs should be tagged tomorrow ;)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Henri Gomez wrote:
- Tag JTC as mod_jk 1.2.0 and prepare tarball,
which will contains only :
jk/native
jk/docs (generated from xdocs and without jk2 parts)
Do you agree to remove jk2 docs from jk release ?
Just to avoid confusion...
+1
We should add the first tag to jk2 and
Sounds good (although I have to admit I haven't compiled mod_jk from CVS
for a while).
+1
Bojan
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 20:40, Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
Now that code and odc is stabilized in mod_jk 1.2.0, it could be time to
do the release :
Proposals :
Monday 2002/09/23
-
Hi to all,
Now that code and odc is stabilized in mod_jk 1.2.0, it could be time to
do the release :
Proposals :
Monday 2002/09/23
- Freeze native development
Tuesday 2002/09/24
- Tag JTC as mod_jk 1.2.0 and prepare tarball,
which will contains only :
jk/native
jk/docs
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
Now that code and odc is stabilized in mod_jk 1.2.0, it could be time to
do the release :
+1
Proposals :
Monday 2002/09/23
- Freeze native development
Tuesday 2002/09/24
- Tag JTC as mod_jk 1.2.0 and prepare tarball,
which will contains
- Tag JTC as mod_jk 1.2.0 and prepare tarball,
which will contains only :
jk/native
jk/docs (generated from xdocs and without jk2 parts)
Do you agree to remove jk2 docs from jk release ?
Just to avoid confusion...
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Henri Gomez wrote:
- Tag JTC as mod_jk 1.2.0 and prepare tarball,
which will contains only :
jk/native
jk/docs (generated from xdocs and without jk2 parts)
Do you agree to remove jk2 docs from jk release ?
Just to avoid confusion...
+1 to release mod_jk 1.2
+1 to exclude
De: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: 20 de septiembre de 2002 12:41
Monday 2002/09/23
- Freeze native development
Wednesday 2002/09/25
isapi redirector
(nacho ?)
+1 for the overall plan, i'll do win32 binaries for i_r.dll, and mod_jk,
if nobody is faster :))
The current mod_jk expects under CATALINA_HOME/conf.
I think a better place is CATALINA_BASE/conf
Anyone agree?
Of course the appropriate bits of Tomcat need to be changed too.
(I'm new here, hopefully this is not out of place)
Regards,
Matt
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL
Matthew Hannigan wrote:
The current mod_jk expects under CATALINA_HOME/conf.
What do you means by CATALINA_HOME/conf and mod_jk ?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Henri Gomez wrote:
Matthew Hannigan wrote:
The current mod_jk expects under CATALINA_HOME/conf.
What do you means by CATALINA_HOME/conf and mod_jk ?
Hmm I seemed to have dropped a few words. It's late.
Tomcat generates mod_jk.conf in
CATALINA_HOME/conf/auto/mod_jk.conf
I think a
Matthew Hannigan wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Matthew Hannigan wrote:
The current mod_jk expects under CATALINA_HOME/conf.
What do you means by CATALINA_HOME/conf and mod_jk ?
Hmm I seemed to have dropped a few words. It's late.
Tomcat generates mod_jk.conf in
12 matches
Mail list logo
