Re: [4.1.20] Tagging today

2003-02-12 Thread Remy Maucherat
Costin Manolache wrote: After the tag, I would like to port back the jsr77 names for servlets and enable the new attributes ( it'll be conditioned by a flag - so it won't be enable by default, only if someone sets the flag). The change is local to ServerLifecycleListener, and I tested it with relo

Re: [4.1.20] Tagging today

2003-02-11 Thread Costin Manolache
Thanks Amy. Costin Amy Roh wrote: >> Amy Roh wrote: >> >> > I have investigated further and found out that >> > GlobalResourcesLifecycleListener is not creating mbeans for >> > userdatabase anymore, therefore, admin failure due to missing mbeans. >> > >> > Costin, >> > Do you have a better id

Re: [4.1.20] Tagging today

2003-02-11 Thread Amy Roh
> Amy Roh wrote: > > > I have investigated further and found out that > > GlobalResourcesLifecycleListener is not creating mbeans for userdatabase > > anymore, therefore, admin failure due to missing mbeans. > > > > Costin, > > Do you have a better idea why Userdatabase MBeans are not getting > > c

Re: [4.1.20] Tagging today

2003-02-11 Thread Costin Manolache
Amy Roh wrote: > I have investigated further and found out that > GlobalResourcesLifecycleListener is not creating mbeans for userdatabase > anymore, therefore, admin failure due to missing mbeans. > > Costin, > Do you have a better idea why Userdatabase MBeans are not getting > created anymore s

Re: [4.1.20] Tagging today

2003-02-11 Thread Amy Roh
I have investigated further and found out that GlobalResourcesLifecycleListener is not creating mbeans for userdatabase anymore, therefore, admin failure due to missing mbeans. Costin, Do you have a better idea why Userdatabase MBeans are not getting created anymore since your last change? I l

Re: [4.1.20] Tagging today

2003-02-11 Thread Amy Roh
I just checked users/groups/roles part of admin because someone filed a bug and complained about its validation. However, it seems to be broken not finding MBeans for them due to objectname mismatch? I'm not sure what's changed since last release. I'm planning to take a look at it further th

Re: [4.1.20] Tagging today

2003-02-11 Thread Costin Manolache
jean-frederic clere wrote: > Remy Maucherat wrote: >> jean-frederic clere wrote: >> >>> Remy Maucherat wrote: >>> Hi, I plan to tag 4.1.20 later today. Thanks to Glenn and Jan for getting some good fixes in. >>> >>> >>> >>> I would like to add some changes in Manager: >>> For

Re: [4.1.20] Tagging today

2003-02-11 Thread Henri Gomez
jean-frederic clere wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I plan to tag 4.1.20 later today. Thanks to Glenn and Jan for getting some good fixes in. I would like to add some changes in Manager: For example to add createEmptySession that fixes

Re: [4.1.20] Tagging today

2003-02-11 Thread jean-frederic clere
Remy Maucherat wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I plan to tag 4.1.20 later today. Thanks to Glenn and Jan for getting some good fixes in. I would like to add some changes in Manager: For example to add createEmptySession that fixes some problems related to Sess

Re: [4.1.20] Tagging today

2003-02-11 Thread Remy Maucherat
jean-frederic clere wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I plan to tag 4.1.20 later today. Thanks to Glenn and Jan for getting some good fixes in. I would like to add some changes in Manager: For example to add createEmptySession that fixes some problems related to SessionId. (The changes I rol

Re: [4.1.20] Tagging today

2003-02-11 Thread jean-frederic clere
Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I plan to tag 4.1.20 later today. Thanks to Glenn and Jan for getting some good fixes in. I would like to add some changes in Manager: For example to add createEmptySession that fixes some problems related to SessionId. (The changes I rolled back some weeks ago). Shou

[4.1.20] Tagging today

2003-02-10 Thread Remy Maucherat
Hi, I plan to tag 4.1.20 later today. Thanks to Glenn and Jan for getting some good fixes in. Remy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]