Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First, a simple vote about the version numbering scheme for Tomcat 5.0.
> I think the method used for Tomcat 4.1.x is working well and promotes
> quality, although it certainly delayed the apprition of a stable build
> of Tomcat 4.1.
> I propose keeping it for T
Milestones imply a series of goals to be met, not just when we feel
like it, or every Tuesday. To be a milestone, there need to some
objective criteria that everyone can agree have been met.
Don't get me wrong, I like frequent builds, I just hate to see a useful
release engineering term get
>
> +1 [X] Tomcat 5 should use Tomcat 4.1 version numbering scheme and
> release management
> -1 [ ] Tomcat 5 should use something else (to be decided later)
>
>
> Although Tomcat 5 is still far from being feature complete (and won't be
> in stable form until the servlet & JSP specs ship, at
>
>
> +1 [X] Tomcat 5 should use Tomcat 4.1 version numbering scheme and
> release management
> -1 [ ] Tomcat 5 should use something else (to be decided later)
>
>
>
>
> +1 [ ] Start releasing milestones for Tomcat 5.0 on a regular basis soon
> -1 [X] No, later
But it's really more of a -0.
>
Remy,
Here are my votes:
+1 [X] Tomcat 5 should use Tomcat 4.1 version numbering scheme and
release management
-1 [ ] Tomcat 5 should use something else (to be decided later)
+1 [ ] Start releasing milestones for Tomcat 5.0 on a regular basis soon
-1 [X] No, later
Patrick
--
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:06:35 +0200
> From: Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [5.0] [VOTE]
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First, a simple vote about the version numbering scheme for Tomcat 5.0.
> I think the method used for Tomcat 4.1.x is working well and promotes
> quality, although it certainly delayed the apprition of a stable build
> of Tomcat 4.1.
> I pro
"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1 [X] Tomcat 5 should use Tomcat 4.1 version numbering scheme and
>release management
> -1 [ ] Tomcat 5 should use something else (to be decided later)
>
No comment.
>
> +1 [ ] Start releasing milestones for Tomcat 5.0 on a regular bas
Hi,
First, a simple vote about the version numbering scheme for Tomcat 5.0.
I think the method used for Tomcat 4.1.x is working well and promotes
quality, although it certainly delayed the apprition of a stable build
of Tomcat 4.1.
I propose keeping it for Tomcat 5.0.
+1 [ ] Tomcat 5 should u
