They all passes, with and without the SecurityManager.
-- Jeanfrancois
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently running the JSP/Servlet tcks. More results to come...
-- Jeanfrancois
Bill, I'm still working for you trying to get the tcks. The situation
is similar to "Les 12 travaux d'Aste
Hi,
I'm currently running the JSP/Servlet tcks. More results to come...
-- Jeanfrancois
Bill, I'm still working for you trying to get the tcks. The situation is
similar to "Les 12 travaux d'Asterix" and "le laissez passer A39". I
might be getting mad before I find the right person to speak ;-)
Remy Maucherat wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Howdy,
Howdy, I tagged daemon as part of setting up for mirroring yesterday.
The code hasn't changed in a while AFAIK, i.e. the binaries for
"1.0-Alpha" and 1.0 will be the same.
I've seen jsvc updates since 1.0 alpha by di
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Howdy,
Howdy, I tagged daemon as part of setting up for mirroring yesterday.
The code hasn't changed in a while AFAIK, i.e. the binaries for
"1.0-Alpha" and 1.0 will be the same.
I've seen jsvc updates since 1.0 alpha by diffing.
Those should b
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
I plan to tag 5.0.17 tomorrow.
So there will be a fix for a DoS with SSL in this release (plus the XSS
"issue", but I'll only mention it in the changelog). I'll tag 4.1.30 a
little bit later (since it's supposed to be the really stable branch, it
can use some testing
Howdy,
>Someone has tagged daemon with COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0.
>Should I use this tag to produce the daemon binaries?
I tagged it yesterday. You can ignore it: you can re-tag if needed, or
use a different new tag for the binaries.
Yoav Shapira
This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confid
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Howdy,
Howdy, I tagged daemon as part of setting up for mirroring yesterday.
The code hasn't changed in a while AFAIK, i.e. the binaries for
"1.0-Alpha" and 1.0 will be the same.
I've seen jsvc updates since 1.0 alpha by diffing.
Those should be daemon 1.1, I think, as 1.0
Howdy,
>> Howdy, I tagged daemon as part of setting up for mirroring yesterday.
>> The code hasn't changed in a while AFAIK, i.e. the binaries for
>> "1.0-Alpha" and 1.0 will be the same.
>
>I've seen jsvc updates since 1.0 alpha by diffing.
Those should be daemon 1.1, I think, as 1.0 (not 1.0-A
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Howdy, I tagged daemon as part of setting up for mirroring yesterday.
The code hasn't changed in a while AFAIK, i.e. the binaries for
"1.0-Alpha" and 1.0 will be the same.
I've seen jsvc updates since 1.0 alpha by diffing.
Rémy
-
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 6:59 PM
>To: Tomcat Developers List
>Subject: Re: Urgent: [5.0.17] Tag tomorrow
>
>Remy Maucherat wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'll need new procrun binaries for this release. Can someone (Mladen ?)
>> commit som
Filip Hanik wrote:
sounds good, perfect timing, I've made some big progress on clustering and
performance.
It is getting there, I still have to develop the "distributed" log in, ie,
replicate the request that gets stored
when a user is redirected for a login. Other than that, it is starting to
look
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: Urgent: [5.0.17] Tag tomorrow
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
>
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
I'll need new procrun binaries for this release. Can someone (Mladen ?)
commit some new ones in j-t-c ?
Actually, I just noticed there were also useful updates to jsvc, and a
daemon 1.0 tag in the CVS (but I see no binaries online). I think I need
a status update ;-)
ally good.
I'll complete the docs today
Filip
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 5:54 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: [5.0.17] Tag tomorrow
Hi,
I plan to tag 5.0.17 tomorrow.
So there will be a fix for a DoS with
Hi,
I'll need new procrun binaries for this release. Can someone (Mladen ?)
commit some new ones in j-t-c ?
Thanks :)
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I plan to tag 5.0.17 tomorrow.
So there will be a fix for a DoS with SSL in this release (plus the XSS
"issue", but I'll only mention it in the changelog). I'll tag 4.1.30 a
little bit later (since it's supposed to be the really stable branch, it
can use some testing through 5.0.x).
As fo
16 matches
Mail list logo