RE: [5.0.19] Release vote

2004-02-19 Thread Larry Isaacs
cherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 12:16 PM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [5.0.19] Release vote > > > So I will anounce Tomcat 5.0.19 and 4.1.30 on monda

Re: [5.0.19] Release vote

2004-02-19 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 4:41 AM Subject: [5.0.19] Release vote Release 5.0.19

Re: [5.0.19] Release vote

2004-02-19 Thread Remy Maucherat
So I will anounce Tomcat 5.0.19 and 4.1.30 on monday. What about 3.3.2, BTW ? Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [5.0.19] Release vote

2004-02-18 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: "Jess Holle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 12:01 PM Subject: Re: [5.0.19] Release vote > Bill Barker wrote: > > >It looked like it should wo

Re: [5.0.19] Release vote

2004-02-18 Thread Ankur Shah
Remy Maucherat wrote: Guenter Knauf wrote: just found another small issue (seen on Linux and Win32) - the link on the Tomcat main page to webdav now produces a directory listing rather than call index.html This is normal as well. I noticed it this morning, as well (on Solaris 8 and 9). Just out

Re: [5.0.19] Release vote

2004-02-18 Thread Jess Holle
Bill Barker wrote: It looked like it should work, but I couldn't free up a machine to test it on (until now :). You can get rid of the messages by adding: request.registerRequests=false to your jk2.properties file. Thanks. What are the other effects of taking this action (and not taking thi

Re: [5.0.19] Release vote

2004-02-18 Thread Bill Barker
o: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 1:30 AM Subject: Re: [5.0.19] Release vote Jess Holle wrote: >*Feb 17, 2004 5:01:39 PM org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest >decodeRequest >WARNING: Error registering request* For so

Re: [5.0.19] Release vote

2004-02-18 Thread Remy Maucherat
Guenter Knauf wrote: This is as intended, and is indeed a change in behavior. I understand it could cause trouble for some applications, but is a lot cleaner and more efficient. but it prevents to move applications from TC4 to TC5 since they dont work out-of-the-box as before, f.e. *.war. isnt ther

Re: [5.0.19] Release vote

2004-02-18 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi Remy, >> two things I found (which are probably older bugs, seen them with >> 5.0.18 too): >> >> - if I call snoop.jsp directly through Tomcat I get 'Content length: >> -1' while through mod_jk2 I get 'Content length: 0' > Both are acceptable, but -1 is more accurate. ok. >> - redirection to t

Re: [5.0.19] Release vote

2004-02-18 Thread Remy Maucherat
Remy Maucherat wrote: Release 5.0.19 as Stable: [X] Yes [ ] No This build seems ok overall. (I'll move it for mirrorring) Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [5.0.19] Release vote

2004-02-18 Thread Remy Maucherat
Jess Holle wrote: *Feb 17, 2004 5:01:39 PM org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest decodeRequest WARNING: Error registering request* For some reason, the request isn't registered in JMX (which is used for). It wasn't registered either in previous builds, so I suppose it's not a big change ;)

Re: [5.0.19] Release vote

2004-02-17 Thread Jess Holle
Tomcat 5.0.19 seems to work well enough. One question, though. I'm now seeing the following messages as I test my application: *Feb 17, 2004 4:59:34 PM org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest decodeRequest WARNING: Error registering request* Feb 17, 2004 4:59:38 PM org.apache.jk.server.J

Re: [5.0.19] Release vote

2004-02-17 Thread Jeanfrancois Arcand
Remy Maucherat wrote: Release 5.0.19 as Stable: [ X] Yes [ ] No All Servlet/JSP tcks passes with/without validation/security. I've fixed a minor jmx problem that should not stop the release. -- Jeanfrancois Rémy - To uns

RE: [5.0.19] Release vote

2004-02-17 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Howdy, >-Original Message- >From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 7:42 AM >To: Tomcat Developers List >Subject: [5.0.19] Release vote > > >Release 5.0.19 as Stable: >[ X ] Yes >[ ] No > Nothing seems broken, go

Re: [5.0.19] Release vote

2004-02-16 Thread Ankur Shah
FWIW, tested a couple of my own webapps with Solaris 8 and Solaris 9 + Sun JVM 1.4.2_03 (no apache) without problem. -- A Guenter Knauf wrote: Hi, Release 5.0.19 as Stable: [x] Yes [ ] No tested that it starts fine and that the samples work on: SuSE Linux 7.0 + 8.2 mod_jk2 JVM Sun 1.

RE: [5.0.19] Release vote

2004-02-16 Thread Filip Hanik \(lists\)
AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: [5.0.19] Release vote Release 5.0.19 as Stable: [ ] Yes [ ] No Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is

Re: [5.0.19] Release vote

2004-02-16 Thread Remy Maucherat
Guenter Knauf wrote: Hi, Release 5.0.19 as Stable: [x] Yes [ ] No tested that it starts fine and that the samples work on: SuSE Linux 7.0 + 8.2 mod_jk2 JVM Sun 1.4.2_03 Novell NetWare 6.5 mod_jk2 JVM Sun 1.4.2_02 Novell NetWare 6.0 mod_jk2 JVM Sun 1.4.1_05 Win2K SP4 mod_jk2 JVM Sun 1.4.2_03 WinX

Re: [5.0.19] Release vote

2004-02-16 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi, > > Release 5.0.19 as Stable: > [x] Yes > [ ] No > tested that it starts fine and that the samples work on: SuSE Linux 7.0 + 8.2 mod_jk2 JVM Sun 1.4.2_03 Novell NetWare 6.5 mod_jk2 JVM Sun 1.4.2_02 Novell NetWare 6.0 mod_jk2 JVM Sun 1.4.1_05 Win2K SP4 mod_jk2 JVM Sun 1.4.2_03 WinXP SP1 mod_j

[5.0.19] Release vote

2004-02-16 Thread Remy Maucherat
Release 5.0.19 as Stable: [ ] Yes [ ] No Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]