Bill Barker wrote:
TC 3.3 has o.a.t.u.xml.* which is uses instead of Digester. If it helps
with re-inventing wheels, you could take a look at it.
Yes, it's also in TC 4. I think it has limitations when compared to the
digester. Overall, the biggest problem of the digester might be the huge
amoun
Peter Lin wrote:
I see your back from vacation. I hope it was restful.
No, no, I was doing a training in Vienna ;)
I've started
working on porting CLIPS 6.2 from C to Java. Once that is done, I will
donate it back to CLIPS community (since it's public domain software),
donate it as a project to ap
uot;Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: [5.next] Summary
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
>> - Move to concrete classes for request/response, and remove all of the
>> RTTI done in Catalina'
I see your back from vacation. I hope it was restful. I've started
working on porting CLIPS 6.2 from C to Java. Once that is done, I will
donate it back to CLIPS community (since it's public domain software),
donate it as a project to apache and use it in RuleML development.
JBoss should be able
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
- Move to concrete classes for request/response, and remove all of the
RTTI done in Catalina's pipeline
Ok, I'm almost done with the first part of the refatoring (thanks to
Eclipse 3) :)
I think I'll commit when I'm done with the next two items, so that
Remy Maucherat wrote:
- Move to concrete classes for request/response, and remove all of the
RTTI done in Catalina's pipeline
Ok, I'm almost done with the first part of the refatoring (thanks to
Eclipse 3) :)
I think I'll commit when I'm done with the next two items, so that all
the big core chan
"Tomcat Developers List"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc:
om> Subject: Re: [5.next] Summary
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 11:50 AM
Subject: [5.next] Summary
> - Move to concrete classes for request/response, and remove all of the
> RTTI done in Catalina's pipeline
> - Use Tomcat 4.0 beta valve pattern
> - Redo logging using commons-logging, and re
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi, Cool stuff ;)
I'm away in two weeks, so I'll tag and branch 5.0.27 and TOMCAT_5_0
at the end of next week, so that you can start working on HEAD two
weeks when you're back from vaca.
I'm going to have a lot of fun: it's a training in Vienna.
I guess you have to go earn mone
emy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 12:51 PM
>To: Tomcat Developers List
>Subject: [5.next] Summary
>
>- Move to concrete classes for request/response, and remove all of the
>RTTI done in Catalina's pipeline
>- Use Tomcat 4.0 beta valve pat
- Move to concrete classes for request/response, and remove all of the
RTTI done in Catalina's pipeline
- Use Tomcat 4.0 beta valve pattern
- Redo logging using commons-logging, and remove Logger
- "Fork" commons-digester, to remove what we don't need (many fancy
features provided by beanutils, an
11 matches
Mail list logo
