> -Original Message-
> From: Ignacio J. Ortega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> > I'm calling them 'default' (Nacho calls them global) simply
> > because this
> > name is more what they really are (mappings bound to the
> > default host).
> >
>
> I think we are calling it diffreent
> From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 5:00 PM
>
> I'm calling them 'default' (Nacho calls them global) simply
> because this
> name is more what they really are (mappings bound to the
> default host).
>
I think we are calling it diffreent because they
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Costin Manolache
> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 4:47 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JK2] uriMap and virtual hosts
>
>
> Mladen Turk wrote:
>
> > When we define
> -Original Message-
> From: Ignacio J. Ortega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> > host's mappings. That way we may use the single
> [uri:/*.jsp] that will
> > propagate trough each virtual host that has the 'inherit' flag set.
> >
> > Does it make sense to do something like that?
>
>
Mladen Turk wrote:
> When we define a host using scheme [uri:somehost] then only the mappings
> defined for that host are used for uriMap matching.
You mean that 'default' mappings ( those without a host ) shouldn't be
used ?
I see the problem - 'default' mappings should be used for requests
omething like that?
I'm a little lost in the uriMap journey.. this is not a global mapping?
this should work right now, only by putting a single [uri:/*.jsp] in
wk2.p file.., this is what i called global mappings..
Saludos,
Ignacio J. Ortega
> -Original Message-----
> To: [
Hi,
I have a question whether it would be OK to implement uriMap vhost in a
following way:
When we define a host using scheme [uri:somehost] then only the mappings
defined for that host are
used for uriMap matching.
I would like to add the option like 'inherit' that will when set and the
uriMap
