Committed.
Mike Anderson
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/2/2004 10:29:26 AM >>>
Hi Henri,
>> Do you know what's about the ./native2/common/jk_channel_socket.c
file?
>> Does soemone still use it since APR is now mandatory, or can we
remove
>> it?
>>If it stays then we should also patch the port there to '
Hi Henri,
>> Do you know what's about the ./native2/common/jk_channel_socket.c file?
>> Does soemone still use it since APR is now mandatory, or can we remove
>> it?
>>If it stays then we should also patch the port there to 'unsigned
>>short'...
> Yes, it should be removed but the conservative app
Günter Knauf a écrit :
Commited, thanks
thanks, Henri!
Do you know what's about the ./native2/common/jk_channel_socket.c file? Does soemone still use it since APR is now mandatory, or can we remove it?
If it stays then we should also patch the port there to 'unsigned short'...
Yes, it should be
> Commited, thanks
thanks, Henri!
Do you know what's about the ./native2/common/jk_channel_socket.c file? Does soemone
still use it since APR is now mandatory, or can we remove it? If it stays then we
should also patch the port there to 'unsigned short'...
Guenter.
-
Commited, thanks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
> This would also allow closing of Bug 17579 since the recent changeover to
> APR for mod_jk2 (now using jk_channel_apr_socket.c)
thanks for the pointer! Showed that my recent patch was incomplete...; so next try:
http://www.gknw.com/test/jk_channel_apr_socket.c.diff
==
Good morning All.
This would also allow closing of Bug 17579 since the recent changeover to
APR for mod_jk2 (now using jk_channel_apr_socket.c)
Norm
> Hi,
> a user just found that the port number is limited to less than 32768 with
mod_jk2;
> the patch below solves this:
> http://www.gknw.com/test