. Hopefully this will end the recuring how to handle STM servlets
debate (at least on the 3.3 side of the list ;)
- Original Message -
From: Schreibman, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 4:58 PM
Subject: [PATCH] SingleThreadModel Pool for TC 3.3
I'm
I've looked at it, and will check it in after 3.3 goes final.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SingleThreadModel Pool for TC 3.3
Thanks David.
I don't like STM, but since it's part
I'm submitting this with mixed feelings since the recent discussion has
shown strong opinions about the utility of the SingleThreadModel.
I was already in the middle of doing the work when all that came about so I
went ahead and finished it. After reaping the benefits of Tomcat for a
couple of
Schreibman, David wrote:
I'm submitting this with mixed feelings since the recent discussion has
shown strong opinions about the utility of the SingleThreadModel.
STM as a concept has so many flaws that I tend to side with Jon (ie. it
should be dropped from the spec). Personally, I was
Thanks David.
I don't like STM, but since it's part of the spec we need to support it.
And since you spent the time to write it, I think we have the duty to
check it and find a way to check it in:-). Unfortunately,
not for 3.3, it's too late. But 3.3.1 can include it.
Costin
On Thu, 4 Oct
