RE: [PROPOSAL] Minor fix for servletapi-4 GenericServlet

2002-06-18 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>> Which make me think we need a stable tarball/jar/zip >> for servlet-api4 >> > > +1, I dislike having "download the latest nightly >snapshot" in build docs. But how does that happen? May be by creating release in : http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-servletapi-4/ And put signed source/

RE: [PROPOSAL] Minor fix for servletapi-4 GenericServlet

2002-06-14 Thread Larry Isaacs
- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 5:52 PM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Minor fix for servletapi-4 GenericServlet > > > > > On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Christopher K. St. John wrote: > > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minor fix for servletapi-4 GenericServlet

2002-06-14 Thread Remy Maucherat
Christopher K. St. John wrote: > GOMEZ Henri wrote: > >>Did we have to make a general announce about this API >>changes ? >> > > > There are only 5 committers for servletapi-4, and > none of them appears to be active right at the moment. > I agree that there has been way too much discussion >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minor fix for servletapi-4 GenericServlet

2002-06-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Christopher K. St. John wrote: > Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 14:24:58 -0700 (PDT) > From: Christopher K. St. John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL]

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minor fix for servletapi-4 GenericServlet

2002-06-14 Thread Christopher K. St. John
GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > Did we have to make a general announce about this API > changes ? > There are only 5 committers for servletapi-4, and none of them appears to be active right at the moment. I agree that there has been way too much discussion about what is basically a trivial fix, but I'

RE: [PROPOSAL] Minor fix for servletapi-4 GenericServlet

2002-06-14 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-Original Message- >From: Christopher K. St. John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 7:49 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [PROPOSAL] Minor fix for servletapi-4 GenericServlet > > >GO

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minor fix for servletapi-4 GenericServlet

2002-06-13 Thread costinm
+1 That log is really annoying. Please make the change in both 2.2 and 2.3 branches. Costin On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Christopher K. St. John wrote: > "Christopher K. St. John" wrote: > > > > GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > > > > > I propose you to make a PROPOSAL for servletapi4 patch > > > to tomcat-d

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minor fix for servletapi-4 GenericServlet

2002-06-13 Thread Christopher K. St. John
"Christopher K. St. John" wrote: > > GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > > > I propose you to make a PROPOSAL for servletapi4 patch > > to tomcat-dev list. > > > My proposal is ... [delete log() msgs in GenerisServlet] > From my reading of the project guidelines, minor fixes like this normally go the commi

RE: [PROPOSAL] Minor fix for servletapi-4 GenericServlet

2002-06-12 Thread John Trollinger
its own log level) so then all the log() messages can be turned on and off.. -Original Message- From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 3:36 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Minor fix for servletapi-4 GenericServlet Christopher K

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minor fix for servletapi-4 GenericServlet

2002-06-12 Thread Remy Maucherat
Christopher K. St. John wrote: > In the jakarta-servletapi-4 repository, the class: > >javax.servlet.GenericServlet > > has init() and destory() methods that call log(). While > not specifically prohibited in the 2.3 spec, it results > in unncessary output into logs. Also, it's annoying. >

[PROPOSAL] Minor fix for servletapi-4 GenericServlet

2002-06-12 Thread Christopher K. St. John
GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > I propose you to make a PROPOSAL for servletapi4 patch > to tomcat-dev list. > In the jakarta-servletapi-4 repository, the class: javax.servlet.GenericServlet has init() and destory() methods that call log(). While not specifically prohibited in the 2.3 spec, it res