All,
Patrick Luby wrote:
I tend to agree with Jon on this issue. When I voted for a
java-servletapi-5 repository, I made the - I think reasonable -
assumption that the java-servletapi-5 repository would only contain the
JSR-154 code. After all, the java-servletapi-4 repository has, for
Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
[ ] I don't want the API's split into separate repo's
[ ] I don't care
[X] I want the API's split into separate repo's.
It will likely break a few build scripts, but that will be easy to fix.
I'm voting to split (actually, I'm more in the I don't care item)
because
on 7/17/02 11:35 PM, Patrick Luby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Patrick Luby wrote:
I tend to agree with Jon on this issue. When I voted for a
java-servletapi-5 repository, I made the - I think reasonable -
assumption that the java-servletapi-5 repository would only contain the
JSR-154
[ ] I don't want the API's split into separate repo's
[ ] I don't care
[X] I want the API's split into separate repo's.
-jon
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
Therefore, I'm asking for another vote to split the CVS repositories to
represent the split JSR's and adapt the build system of the JSP repository
to have a dependency on the Servlet repository, but not the other way
around. It is ok to also have the JSP build
Patrick Luby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oops. The javax.servlet.jsp.* packages have been in jakarta-servlet-4
for a long time.
In any case, I tried seeing if this issue could be solved by merely
moving the javax.servlet.jsp.* packages over to the
jakarta-tomcat-jasper repository.
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
[X] I don't want the API's split into separate repo's
[ ] I don't care
[ ] I want the API's split into separate repo's.
I'm pretty sure Jon is not proposing this for the benefit of tomcat or
tomcat users, but out of his hate for JSPs. But that's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
[X] I don't want the API's split into separate repo's
[ ] I don't care
[ ] I want the API's split into separate repo's.
I'm pretty sure Jon is not proposing this for the benefit of tomcat or
tomcat users, but out
De: Jon Scott Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: 18 de julio de 2002 1:34
[X] I don't want the API's split into separate repo's
[ ] I don't care
[ ] I want the API's split into separate repo's.
I dont see why this needs another repo, my only reason is that there are
too
|
| [X] I don't want the API's split into separate repo's
| [ ] I don't care
| [ ] I want the API's split into separate repo's.
|
TC 4 has too many external module dependencies as it is.
Keith
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
Quoting Ignacio J. Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
De: Jon Scott Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: 18 de julio de 2002 1:34
[X] I don't want the API's split into separate repo's
[ ] I don't care
[ ] I want the API's split into separate repo's.
I dont see why this
On Fri, 2002-07-19 at 00:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm pretty sure Jon is not proposing this for the benefit of tomcat or
tomcat users, but out of his hate for JSPs.
What's wrong with that?
;-))
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
on 7/18/02 7:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm pretty sure Jon is not proposing this for the benefit of tomcat or
tomcat users, but out of his hate for JSPs.
From my POV, splitting JSP out of Tomcat would benefit Tomcat and Tomcat
users.
-jon
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
on 7/18/02 7:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But that's not the reason
I'm voting against - we already have too many CVS trees and this is
bad organization, it could be well placed in a single CVS in separate
directories.
Having a separate CVS for a dozen of files
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
But that's not the reason
I'm voting against - we already have too many CVS trees and this is
bad organization, it could be well placed in a single CVS in separate
directories.
Having a separate CVS for a dozen of files instead of just
on 7/18/02 4:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, what about using the original jakarta-servletapi repository and
creating a subdir for each JSR ?
I think it should be renamed...
Or a new jakarta-apis directory and creating one subdir for each JSR ?
Sounds good. Maybe even
Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jakarta-apis/jsr154/src/java
jakarta-apis/jsr152/src/java
+1
Pier
--
[Perl] combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion of different
sublanguages in one monolithic executable. It combines the power of C with
the readability of
jakarta-apis/jsr154/src/java
jakarta-apis/jsr152/src/java
+1
Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
jakarta-apis/jsr154/src/java
jakarta-apis/jsr152/src/java
+1 as well.
Costin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 17:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's
jakarta-apis/jsr154/src/java
on 7/18/02 5:13 PM, Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Who gets commit access? This goes beyond Tomcat's committers
once other APIs start getting added.
Craig
That is why I suggested separate repo's.
-jon
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
jakarta-apis/jsr154/src/java
jakarta-apis/jsr152/src/java
+1.
Using the jsr numbers may not be explicit enough, though (but it gets
the job done, so ...).
I have the feeling we're getting somewhere :)
Remy
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An immediate prospect would be the JSTL APIs from jakarta-taglibs/standard
(jsr052).
Makes sense. And jakarta-taglibs will remain for our Apache non-standard
ones, right?
A couple of devils in the details questions:
* Where should CVS commit
After JSR053 was formed and dependencies were added to the Servlet API from
the JSP API, it became clear that this was a bad thing. It was ok to have
the JSP API rely on the Servlet API, but not the other way around. The
reason for this is because many people choose to use the Servlet API without
Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
After JSR053 was formed and dependencies were added to the Servlet API from
the JSP API, it became clear that this was a bad thing. It was ok to have
the JSP API rely on the Servlet API, but not the other way around. The
reason for this is because many people choose
Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ] I don't want the API's split into separate repo's
[ ] I don't care
[X] I want the API's split into separate repo's.
Pier
--
[Perl] combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion of different
sublanguages in one monolithic
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 16:34:18 -0700
From: Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tomcat-dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's
After JSR053 was formed and dependencies
Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
[ ] I don't want the API's split into separate repo's
[ ] I don't care
[X] I want the API's split into separate repo's.
-jon
I tend to agree with Jon on this issue. When I voted for a
java-servletapi-5 repository, I made the - I think reasonable -
assumption
28 matches
Mail list logo
