DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36681] - 2 Tomcat 5.5.7 clusters come to a grinding hault and generate errors

2005-09-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36681] - 2 Tomcat 5.5.7 clusters come to a grinding hault and generate errors

2005-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36681] - 2 Tomcat 5.5.7 clusters come to a grinding hault and generate errors

2005-09-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36681] - 2 Tomcat 5.5.7 clusters come to a grinding hault and generate errors

2005-09-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36681] - 2 Tomcat 5.5.7 clusters come to a grinding hault and generate errors

2005-09-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36681] - 2 Tomcat 5.5.7 clusters come to a grinding hault and generate errors

2005-09-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36681] - 2 Tomcat 5.5.7 clusters come to a grinding hault and generate errors

2005-09-15 Thread bugzilla
EDINFO --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-16 08:34 --- Hey, I can't see the problem without your cluster config. PLease report your server.xml, used OS, JVM. Tomcat 5.5.7 clustering is not stable. Please use Tomcat 5.5.9 with my Cluster Fix pack Bug(http://issues

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36681] New: - 2 Tomcat 5.5.7 clusters come to a grinding hault and generate errors

2005-09-15 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36681 Summary: 2 Tomcat 5.5.7 clusters come to a grinding hault and generate errors Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.7 Platform: Sun OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34176] - can't retrieve JNDI resource in 5.5.8 (works in 5.5.7)

2005-04-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34176] - can't retrieve JNDI resource in 5.5.8 (works in 5.5.7)

2005-03-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34176] New: - can't retrieve JNDI resource in 5.5.8 (works in 5.5.7)

2005-03-25 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34176 Summary: can't retrieve JNDI resource in 5.5.8 (works in 5.5.7) Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.8 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P2 Componen

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33463] - Struts PlugIn.destroy() method not called when WebApp stopped in Tomcat 5.5.7

2005-03-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33885] - Tomcat 5.5.7 deleting context configuration and webapp

2005-03-17 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33885 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-17 20:04 --- This bug is present in Tomcat 5.5.7 but is no longer present in the current cvs HEAD. The following stacktrace was captured during deletion of the test case app supplied using Tomcat

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33916] - Multipart request errors occuring after upgrading to 5.5.7

2005-03-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33916] - Multipart request errors occuring after upgrading to 5.5.7

2005-03-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33916] - Multipart request errors occuring after upgrading to 5.5.7

2005-03-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33916] New: - Multipart request errors occuring after upgrading to 5.5.7

2005-03-08 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33916 Summary: Multipart request errors occuring after upgrading to 5.5.7 Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.7 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows 2000 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priori

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33463] - Struts PlugIn.destroy() method not called when WebApp stopped in Tomcat 5.5.7

2005-03-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33885] - Tomcat 5.5.7 deleting context configuration and webapp

2005-03-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33885] - Tomcat 5.5.7 deleting context configuration and webapp

2005-03-07 Thread bugzilla
NVALID | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-07 23:53 --- Huh? The context file attached does include a path attribute and it does include a docBase *intentionally* misspelled. That is needed to trigger the bug. I can reproduce it consistently on my installation with Tomcat

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33885] - Tomcat 5.5.7 deleting context configuration and webapp

2005-03-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33885] - Tomcat 5.5.7 deleting context configuration and webapp

2005-03-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33885] - Tomcat 5.5.7 deleting context configuration and webapp

2005-03-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33885] - Tomcat 5.5.7 deleting context configuration and webapp

2005-03-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33885] New: - Tomcat 5.5.7 deleting context configuration and webapp

2005-03-07 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33885 Summary: Tomcat 5.5.7 deleting context configuration and webapp Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.7 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Com

Tomcat 5.5.7 deleting context configuration and webapp

2005-03-07 Thread Anil Gangolli
Hi: I'm seeing the following unexpected behavior on Tomcat 5.5.7: Place a context configuration file in CATALINA_HOME/conf/Catalina/localhost/myapp.xml with a mistyped docBase attribute (so as to be point to a non-existent directory). Startup and then shutdown Tomcat; Tomcat seems to d

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33463] - Struts PlugIn.destroy() method not called when WebApp stopped in Tomcat 5.5.7

2005-03-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33819] - 5.5.7 startup script does not work on Linux, JDK 1.5.0

2005-03-04 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33819 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-04 15:33 --- Re reply "Works like a charm for me on FC2. Check your JDK installation." What version is FC2? I used the 5.5.7. currently available from the mirrors. What is there to check re the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33819] - 5.5.7 startup script does not work on Linux, JDK 1.5.0

2005-03-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33819] New: - 5.5.7 startup script does not work on Linux, JDK 1.5.0

2005-03-02 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33819 Summary: 5.5.7 startup script does not work on Linux, JDK 1.5.0 Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.7 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P1 Component: Ca

Re: ThreadDeath with tomcat 5.5.7 and bouncycastle

2005-02-19 Thread Adam Jenkins
FYI This seems to relate to tomcat bug 26372. On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 09:00 +1100, Adam Jenkins wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm getting a really odd error when I try to init a ciphers (or any > other artifact for that matter) using BC as the provider in tomcat 5.5.7 > (struts applica

ThreadDeath with tomcat 5.5.7 and bouncycastle

2005-02-19 Thread Adam Jenkins
Hi All, I'm getting a really odd error when I try to init a ciphers (or any other artifact for that matter) using BC as the provider in tomcat 5.5.7 (struts application). The call is simply final Cipher rsaCipher = Cipher.getInstance("RSA/ECB/PKCS1Padding", "BC");

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33632] - I had wrote a header filter extends RequestFilterValve for Tomcat 5.5.7

2005-02-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33632] New: - I had wrote a header filter extends RequestFilterValve for Tomcat 5.5.7

2005-02-18 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33632 Summary: I had wrote a header filter extends RequestFilterValve for Tomcat 5.5.7 Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.7 Platform: All URL: http://groups- beta.google.com/group/li

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33623] - Tomcat 5.5.7 could not be started on Redhat Enterprise V3.0 linux

2005-02-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33623] New: - Tomcat 5.5.7 could not be started on Redhat Enterprise V3.0 linux

2005-02-17 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33623 Summary: Tomcat 5.5.7 could not be started on Redhat Enterprise V3.0 linux Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.7 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priori

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33463] - Struts PlugIn.destroy() method not called when WebApp stopped in Tomcat 5.5.7

2005-02-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33463] - Struts PlugIn.destroy() method not called when WebApp stopped in Tomcat 5.5.7

2005-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33463] - Struts PlugIn.destroy() method not called when WebApp stopped in Tomcat 5.5.7

2005-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33463] - Struts PlugIn.destroy() method not called when WebApp stopped in Tomcat 5.5.7

2005-02-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33463] New: - Struts PlugIn.destroy() method not called when WebApp stopped in Tomcat 5.5.7

2005-02-09 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33463 Summary: Struts PlugIn.destroy() method not called when WebApp stopped in Tomcat 5.5.7 Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.7 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity:

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Tomcat 5.5.7 Stability

2005-01-31 Thread Jacek Laskowski
Yoav Shapira wrote: The Apache Jakarta Tomcat team is proud to announce that Tomcat 5.5.7 has been voted stable after substantial evaluation and testing. The vote thread is archived at http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11067421773&r=1&w=2 among other places. ...and the jars (these

[VOTE][RESULT] Tomcat 5.5.7 Stability

2005-01-30 Thread Yoav Shapira
The Apache Jakarta Tomcat team is proud to announce that Tomcat 5.5.7 has been voted stable after substantial evaluation and testing. The vote thread is archived at http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11067421773&r=1&w=2 among other

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 5.5.7 Stability

2005-01-29 Thread Mladen Turk
Yoav Shapira wrote: [ ] Alpha: leave it as-is, numerous bugs, etc. [ ] Beta: good quality release, at least one issue preventing stable vote [X] Stable: solid, no major issues (minor issues possible) Finally got a chance to run all the tests. It's snowing after all, and everything runs slower :). M

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 5.5.7 Stability

2005-01-28 Thread Jess Holle
You can and have fixed CLASSPATH in the past. Use of the JRE's lib/ext or lib/endorsed is different -- and not reasonably solvable, though. -- Jess Holle Remy Maucherat wrote: Tim Funk wrote: I'm going to abstain from voting since I am unable to adequately test. But I did find one item which cou

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 5.5.7 Stability

2005-01-28 Thread Remy Maucherat
Tim Funk wrote: I'm going to abstain from voting since I am unable to adequately test. But I did find one item which could be a PITA for the folks on tomcat-user. In setclasspath.sh - the CLASSPATH isn't always overridden. If the user tries to start tomcat with an existing CLASSPATH - that is a

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 5.5.7 Stability

2005-01-28 Thread Tim Funk
CLASSPATH enironment variable set. -Tim Yoav Shapira wrote: Hi, Tomcat 5.5.7 was released a week ago, and now it's time for a stability vote ;) I have yet to see TCK results, but this has been a crazy month for everyone it seems... [ ] Alpha: leave it as-is, numerous bugs, etc. [ ] Bet

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 5.5.7 Stability

2005-01-28 Thread Peter Rossbach
Yoav Shapira schrieb: Hi, Tomcat 5.5.7 was released a week ago, and now it's time for a stability vote ;) I have yet to see TCK results, but this has been a crazy month for everyone it seems... [ ] Alpha: leave it as-is, numerous bugs, etc. [ ] Beta: good quality release, at least one

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 5.5.7 Stability

2005-01-26 Thread Remy Maucherat
Yoav Shapira wrote: Hi, Tomcat 5.5.7 was released a week ago, and now it's time for a stability vote ;) I have yet to see TCK results, but this has been a crazy month for everyone it seems... [ ] Alpha: leave it as-is, numerous bugs, etc. [ ] Beta: good quality release, at least one

[VOTE] Tomcat 5.5.7 Stability

2005-01-26 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, Tomcat 5.5.7 was released a week ago, and now it's time for a stability vote ;) I have yet to see TCK results, but this has been a crazy month for everyone it seems... [ ] Alpha: leave it as-is, numerous bugs, etc. [ ] Beta: good quality release, at least one issue preventing stable

Re: [ANN] Apache Jakarta Tomcat 5.5.7-alpha Released

2005-01-20 Thread Jacek Laskowski
Remy Maucherat wrote: The Apache Jakarta Tomcat team is proud to announce the immediate availability of Tomcat 5.5.7-alpha. This build contains numerous bug fixes, documentation updates, and other improvements. Hi, 5.5.7-alpha is on its way to iBiblio. It's already on http://www.apache.org

[ANN] Apache Jakarta Tomcat 5.5.7-alpha Released

2005-01-20 Thread Remy Maucherat
The Apache Jakarta Tomcat team is proud to announce the immediate availability of Tomcat 5.5.7-alpha. This build contains numerous bug fixes, documentation updates, and other improvements. Release notes: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.5-doc/RELEASE-NOTES Please refer to the change

Re: 5.5.7 ?

2005-01-13 Thread Peter Rossbach
pected for this January boot camp at school... Yoav -Original Message- From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 8:00 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: 5.5.7 ? I think the initial work on the new config save is now done, and it appears to be working a

Re: 5.5.7 ?

2005-01-13 Thread Remy Maucherat
Yoav Shapira wrote: Hi, It's certainly OK for you to do one ;) If you want me to do it, that's also OK, but it will have to wait until this weekend. Either way is fine with me. I haven't looked at (much less written) any code recently, as I expected for this January boot camp at school... I'm ok

RE: 5.5.7 ?

2005-01-13 Thread Yoav Shapira
-Original Message- From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 8:00 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: 5.5.7 ? I think the initial work on the new config save is now done, and it appears to be working at least as well as the old one. Yoav, would it be

Re: 5.5.7 ?

2005-01-13 Thread Remy Maucherat
Peter Rossbach wrote: Yes, I thing the first step to better saving server.xml is done! It works very well (I tested again with your latest patch - the removal of "path" will hopefully avoid users getting bad ideas ;) ). The XML is clean, well indented, and easy to read. Rémy

Re: 5.5.7 ?

2005-01-13 Thread Peter Rossbach
Yes, I thing the first step to better saving server.xml is done! +1 Vote for Release 5.5.7 Peter Remy Maucherat schrieb: I think the initial work on the new config save is now done, and it appears to be working at least as well as the old one. Yoav, would it be ok to do a new build picking up

5.5.7 ?

2005-01-13 Thread Remy Maucherat
I think the initial work on the new config save is now done, and it appears to be working at least as well as the old one. Yoav, would it be ok to do a new build picking up all the changes and fixes ? Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-m