DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27122] - IE plugins cannot access components through Tomcat 5 over SSL

2005-09-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27122.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27122


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-09-20 19:13 ---
*** Bug 36735 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27122] - IE plugins cannot access components through Tomcat 5 over SSL

2004-09-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27122.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27122

IE plugins cannot access components through Tomcat 5 over SSL





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-09-06 12:09 ---
*** Bug 30618 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27122] - IE plugins cannot access components through Tomcat 5 over SSL

2004-08-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27122.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27122

IE plugins cannot access components through Tomcat 5 over SSL

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-08-12 15:13 ---
*** Bug 30618 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27122] - IE plugins cannot access components through Tomcat 5 over SSL

2004-07-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27122.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27122

IE plugins cannot access components through Tomcat 5 over SSL





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-07-12 11:58 ---
Microsoft describes the exact behaviour of their bug on this webpage:

http://support.microsoft.com/?id=316431

Microsoft says that this bug is by design and that they will not ifx it. This 
is just SOOO arrogant!!

--

Tomcat adds the respective caching headers to the HTTP header automatically if 
and only if a resource of a webapp is being accessed for which a user data 
constraint of CONFIDENTIAL has been set.

I PROPOSE TO HAVE A SPECIAL ATTRIBUTE WITHIN THE CONNECTOR CONFIGURATION BY 
WHICH TOMCAT CAN BE FORCED NOT TO SET CACHING HEADERS ITSELF.

*** PLUS ***

I DON'T LIKE THAT THIS BUG HAS BEEN MARKED AS INVALID!
SEVERAL PEOPLE HAVE REPORTED THIS BEHAVIOUR AND a FIX IS POSSIBLE AND 
STRAIGHTFORWARD TO APPLY.
(Search for 'no-cache' within the connector codebase and put an if(doCaching) 
bracket around it. That's all there is to it.)

I leave it to the tomcat developers to reopen this bug as I regard it as 
somehow impolite to do this myself. However, I strongly recommend you people to 
do so. This bug is reproducible on every InternetExplorer. A lot of people will 
get headaches and spend days on investigation unless you add the proposed 
attribute to the connector configuration or at least place a comment on the 
webpage which informs developers of the effect in question.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27122] - IE plugins cannot access components through Tomcat 5 over SSL

2004-07-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27122.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27122

IE plugins cannot access components through Tomcat 5 over SSL

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-07-08 19:42 ---
*** Bug 29975 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27122] - IE plugins cannot access components through Tomcat 5 over SSL

2004-06-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27122.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27122

IE plugins cannot access components through Tomcat 5 over SSL

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-06-02 16:06 ---
*** Bug 29336 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27122] - IE plugins cannot access components through Tomcat 5 over SSL

2004-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27122.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27122

IE plugins cannot access components through Tomcat 5 over SSL

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-04-28 23:21 ---
*** Bug 28662 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27122] - IE plugins cannot access components through Tomcat 5 over SSL

2004-02-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27122.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27122

IE plugins cannot access components through Tomcat 5 over SSL

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Opera/IE fail to access JSP |IE plugins cannot access
   |pages of MIME type  |components through Tomcat 5
   |image/svg+xml when using SSL|over SSL



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-02-25 22:40 ---
Yep - that solved it.  Thanks!

(Also, I see that Tomcat 5.0.19 was released, so I tested it against that
version and got the same problem on Solaris.)

This is a bug with the way Internet Explorer handles plugins, then.  My guess is
that the file isn't cached so that when the plugin attempts to access it, it
doesn't receive anything causing it to silently fail.

I just tried uploading the Badgers-Badgers SWF and seeing if it would fail in
the same way, and it does.  So this happens with any IE plugin.

Mind you, the way Internet Explorer fails with this is weird.  It just indicates
that the resource is not available, despite all other indications being that it
is.  It also happens when you attempt to directly access the resource through
IE, it asks you to download the file and then tells you that it isn't available.
 It might be worth re-openning this bug and removing the no-cache behavior if
MSIE appears in the User-agent header.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]