DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30551] - New version of JK Connector(1.2.6) does not seem to be working for POST requests.

2005-07-22 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30551


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

OtherBugsDependingO||35827
  nThis||




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30551] - New version of JK Connector(1.2.6) does not seem to be working for POST requests.

2005-04-14 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30551





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-04-14 16:59 ---
I'm a bit confused after reading all of the comments on this thread. We were 
able to fix this simply by upgrading our combined web/app servers to XP SP2. 
Does that agree with what others are seeing? We're using the JK 1.2.8 
connector, JBoss 3.2.5 (which includes Tomcat 5.0). The issue we were seeing 
was that GET was working but POST wasn't.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30551] - New version of JK Connector(1.2.6) does not seem to be working for POST requests.

2005-04-13 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30551


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||WORKSFORME




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-04-13 09:48 ---
Again, I've tested this on XPsp2 with all patches applied with
Tomcats 5.0.30, 5.5.9, 4.1.31 and 4.1.29, and jk1.2.10.
(Both IIS and Tomcats are on the same host).

As many of you reported it is happening only on XP with sp1 or sp2,
in some sittuations, so I expect that you have some sort of
third-party antivirus software installed.

Also the error message:
[Mon Apr 04 09:02:40 2005] [0212:3740] [error] read::jk_isapi_plugin.c (584):
ReadClient failed with 274c

Means:
A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly 
respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because 
connected host has failed to respond.

So the simple reason can be that used OS is workstation level (XP) and
imposes the limit on number of concurrent connections to IIS
For workstations this is 10 IIRC.

For example if I run on my XP:
ab -n 1000 -c 5 -p tmp.txt http://localhost/examples/servl
et/SessionExample

Everything works fine (5 concurrent connections)

But If I use 
ab -n 1000 -c 10 -p tmp.txt http://localhost/examples/servl
et/SessionExample

I receive:
2005.04.13 09:45:23 org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket processConnection
SEVERE: Error, processing connection
java.net.SocketException: Software caused connection abort: recv failed
at java.net.SocketInputStream.socketRead0(Native Method)
at java.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:129)
at java.io.BufferedInputStream.fill(BufferedInputStream.java:218)
at java.io.BufferedInputStream.read1(BufferedInputStream.java:256)
at java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:313)
at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.read(ChannelSocket.java:548)
at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.receive(ChannelSocket.java:486)
at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.processConnection
(ChannelSocket.ja
va:603)
at org.apache.jk.common.SocketConnection.runIt(ChannelSocket.java:786)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run
(ThreadP
ool.java:666)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)


So this means that IIS refused connection.
I would suggest that you guys use any Server version of Windows OS
if high load is required.

Please do not reopen this case, because it has nothing to do with
JK, because it's the IIS limitation.

Mladen.




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30551] - New version of JK Connector(1.2.6) does not seem to be working for POST requests.

2005-04-12 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30551


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30551] - New version of JK Connector(1.2.6) does not seem to be working for POST requests.

2005-04-12 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30551


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|critical|blocker
   Priority|P3  |P1




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30551] - New version of JK Connector(1.2.6) does not seem to be working for POST requests.

2005-04-12 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30551





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-04-13 00:11 ---
We are also experiencing this issue and would appreciate a swift resolution or 
workaround. The issue seems to occur on Windows XP but not on Windows 2003. We 
are using version 1.2.8 of the JK connector for IIS/JBoss.

Puneet Lamba
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
339.221.1561


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30551] - New version of JK Connector(1.2.6) does not seem to be working for POST requests.

2005-04-04 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30551


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|WORKSFORME  |




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-04-04 14:12 ---
This bug is certainly happening, as originally described. I have repeated as
follows:
IIS box: WinXP SP1, IIS6, JK 1.2.8 or 1.2.10
Tomcat box: WinXP SP2, Tomcat 4.1.27 or 4.1.29
workers.properties and uriworkers.properties and URL as described by OP

Tomcat says:
4-Apr-2005 9:02:06 AM org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest invoke
SEVERE: Error decoding request
java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
at java.net.SocketInputStream.socketRead0(Native Method)
at java.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:129)
at java.io.BufferedInputStream.fill(BufferedInputStream.java:183)
at java.io.BufferedInputStream.read1(BufferedInputStream.java:222)
at java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:277)
at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.read(ChannelSocket.java:548)
at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.receive(ChannelSocket.java:486)
at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.invoke(ChannelSocket.java:652)
at org.apache.jk.common.JkInputStream.receive(JkInputStream.java:289)
at
org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.decodeRequest(HandlerRequest.java:528)
at org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.invoke(HandlerRequest.java:365)
at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.invoke(ChannelSocket.java:673)
at
org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.processConnection(ChannelSocket.java:615)
at org.apache.jk.common.SocketConnection.runIt(ChannelSocket.java:786)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:666)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
12 34 02 77 02 04 00 08 48 54 54 50 2f 31 2e 31  | .4.wHTTP/1.1
00 00 20 2f 65 78 61 6d 70 6c 65 73 2f 73 65 72  | .. /examples/ser
76 6c 65 74 2f 53 65 73 73 69 6f 6e 45 78 61 6d  | vlet/SessionExam
70 6c 65 00 00 0e 31 39 32 2e 31 36 38 2e 32 30  | ple...192.168.20
30 2e 39 30 00 00 0e 31 39 32 2e 31 36 38 2e 32  | 0.90...192.168.2
30 30 2e 39 30 00 00 0c 6a 73 6d 61 72 74 74 65  | 00.90...jsmartte
73 74 78 70 00 00 50 00 00 0b a0 01 00 63 74 65  | stxp..P...?..cte
78 74 2f 78 6d 6c 2c 61 70 70 6c 69 63 61 74 69  | xt/xml,applicati
6f 6e 2f 78 6d 6c 2c 61 70 70 6c 69 63 61 74 69  | on/xml,applicati
6f 6e 2f 78 68 74 6d 6c 2b 78 6d 6c 2c 74 65 78  | on/xhtml+xml,tex
74 2f 68 74 6d 6c 3b 71 3d 30 2e 39 2c 74 65 78  | t/html;q=0.9,tex
74 2f 70 6c 61 69 6e 3b 71 3d 30 2e 38 2c 69 6d  | t/plain;q=0.8,im
61 67 65 2f 70 6e 67 2c 2a 2f 2a 3b 71 3d 30 2e  | age/png,*/*;q=0.
35 00 a0 06 00 0a 6b 65 65 70 2d 61 6c 69 76 65  | 5.?...keep-alive
00 a0 0b 00 0c 6a 73 6d 61 72 74 74 65 73 74 78  | .?...jsmarttestx
70 00 a0 0d 00 7e 68 74 74 70 3a 2f 2f 6a 73 6d  | p.?..~http://jsm
61 72 74 74 65 73 74 78 70 2f 65 78 61 6d 70 6c  | arttestxp/exampl
65 73 2f 73 65 72 76 6c 65 74 2f 53 65 73 73 69  | es/servlet/Sessi
6f 6e 45 78 61 6d 70 6c 65 3b 6a 73 65 73 73 69  | onExample;jsessi
6f 6e 69 64 3d 33 35 39 36 36 33 39 45 38 41 44  | onid=3596639E8AD
41 31 32 41 45 43 44 39 37 30 39 44 46 43 38 30  | A12AECD9709DFC80
31 42 36 30 44 3f 64 61 74 61 6e 61 6d 65 3d 65  | 1B60D?dataname=e
72 77 65 72 26 64 61 74 61 76 61 6c 75 65 3d 77  | rwer&datavalue=w
65 72 77 65 00 a0 0e 00 54 4d 6f 7a 69 6c 6c 61  | erwe.?..TMozilla
2f 35 2e 30 20 28 57 69 6e 64 6f 77 73 3b 20 55  | /5.0 (Windows; U
3b 20 57 69 6e 64 6f 77 73 20 4e 54 20 35 2e 31  | ; Windows NT 5.1
3b 20 65 6e 2d 55 53 3b 20 72 76 3a 31 2e 37 2e  | ; en-US; rv:1.7.
35 29 20 47 65 63 6b 6f 2f 32 30 30 34 31 31 30  | 5) Gecko/2004110
37 20 46 69 72 65 66 6f 78 2f 31 2e 30 00 a0 09  | 7 Firefox/1.0.?.
00 2b 4a 53 45 53 53 49 4f 4e 49 44 3d 33 35 39  | .+JSESSIONID=359
36 36 33 39 45 38 41 44 41 31 32 41 45 43 44 39  | 6639E8ADA12AECD9
37 30 39 44 46 43 38 30 31 42 36 30 44 00 a0 08  | 709DFC801B60D.?.
00 02 33 32 00 a0 07 00 21 61 70 70 6c 69 63 61  | ..32.?..!applica
74 69 6f 6e 2f 78 2d 77 77 77 2d 66 6f 72 6d 2d  | tion/x-www-form-
75 72 6c 65 6e 63 6f 64 65 64 00 a0 03 00 0c 67  | urlencoded.?...g
7a 69 70 2c 64 65 66 6c 61 74 65 00 a0 02 00 1e  | zip,deflate.?...
49 53 4f 2d 38 38 35 39 2d 31 2c 75 74 66 2d 38  | ISO-8859-1,utf-8
3b 71 3d 30 2e 37 2c 2a 3b 71 3d 30 2e 37 00 00  | ;q=0.7,*;q=0.7..
0a 6b 65 65 70 2d 61 6c 69 76 65 00 00 03 33 30  | .keep-alive...30
30 00 03 00 00 00 04 00 00 00 ff | 0...

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30551] - New version of JK Connector(1.2.6) does not seem to be working for POST requests.

2005-01-18 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30551





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-01-18 23:27 ---
I am experiencing the same error with TC-5.0.28/JK1.2.6/AP1.3.27/RHEL3 & FC3.
worker.properties***
workers.tomcat.home=/usr/share/tomcat5
worker.list=ajp13
worker.ajp13.port=8009
# tried localhost, ip address, and machine name
worker.ajp13.host=localhost
worker.ajp13.type=ajp13
*

***ERROR***
 DEBUG TP-Processor8 org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket - receive()
 DEBUG TP-Processor8 org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket - receive()
 DEBUG TP-Processor8 org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket - read() [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] 8192
0 4 = -1
 DEBUG TP-Processor8 org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket - read() [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] 8192
0 4 = -1
 INFO TP-Processor8 org.apache.jk.common.JkInputStream - Receiving: getting
request body chunk -3 4
 INFO TP-Processor8 org.apache.jk.common.JkInputStream - Receiving: getting
request body chunk -3 4
 ERROR TP-Processor8 org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest - Error decoding 
request
 java.io.IOException
at org.apache.jk.common.JkInputStream.receive(JkInputStream.java:252)
at 
org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.decodeRequest(HandlerRequest.java:500)
at org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.invoke(HandlerRequest.java:352)
at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.invoke(ChannelSocket.java:743)
at 
org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.processConnection(ChannelSocket.java:675)
at org.apache.jk.common.SocketConnection.runIt(ChannelSocket.java:866)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:684)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:567)
ERROR TP-Processor8 org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest - Error decoding request
 java.io.IOException
at org.apache.jk.common.JkInputStream.receive(JkInputStream.java:252)
at 
org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.decodeRequest(HandlerRequest.java:500)
at org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.invoke(HandlerRequest.java:352)
at org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.invoke(ChannelSocket.java:743)
at 
org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.processConnection(ChannelSocket.java:675)
at org.apache.jk.common.SocketConnection.runIt(ChannelSocket.java:866)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:684)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:567)

**


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30551] - New version of JK Connector(1.2.6) does not seem to be working for POST requests.

2004-09-02 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30551

New version of JK Connector(1.2.6) does not seem to be working for POST requests.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WORKSFORME



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-09-02 18:53 ---
I've just did some testing with the:
TC-4.1.30-LE/JK1.2.6/IIS60/WIN2K3.

It works for both for POST and GET data, with IE and Mozilla.
There must be soe other reason why is this breaking.
Try to see if the jk log is reporting something.

Also do you have a Tomcat on a different box? If not then use the:
worker.test.host=localhost

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]