Re: DefaultContext + ResourceLink

2003-10-24 Thread Cam Smith
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 02:52:52 -0700, Peter Harrison wrote:

On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:18, Cam Smith wrote:
 Hi tomcat-dev,

 I just downloaded the latest builds in the hope that this bug might  be
 fixed:

 http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11662
 http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16116

 Unfortunately it still seems to be present.  I'm happy to go with 4.1 or
 5.0 beta, but could someone please take a look at this?  I would  have
 thought that global JDBC datasources plus auto-deployment is a pretty
 mainstream configuration.
The following was posted a couple of days ago, and the bug marked as 
RESOLVED
and FIXED. However, there was also the comment included below which seems to
indicate that the resolution was *not* to place JDBC drivers in the
common/lib directory, but rather add the JDBC jar to the classpath manually.

This is rather confusing. This is a different behavior to Tomcat 4.0.4 
(which
I'm using now), and is undocuented. Ideally it should be fixed so that the
common/lib directory is used, as is the case with older versions.

No, you're talking about an unrelated issue.  My problem is that 
ResourceLinks (to a globally declared resource) declared in a 
DefaultContext element do not propagate to any automatically deployed 
contexts.  This occurs no matter where the driver jar is located.

Apart from forcing you to explicity configure each context, it also makes 
it much harder to use the ant based deployment tasks - in fact I've given up.

I downloaded 5.0.13 as comitters on the list have been describing it as 
stable - but the problem still exists.

thanks,

Cam

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: DefaultContext + ResourceLink

2003-10-24 Thread Remy Maucherat
Cam Smith wrote:

On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 02:52:52 -0700, Peter Harrison wrote:

 On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:18, Cam Smith wrote:
  Hi tomcat-dev,
 
  I just downloaded the latest builds in the hope that this bug might 
  be
  fixed:
 
  http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11662
  http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16116
 
  Unfortunately it still seems to be present.  I'm happy to go with 
4.1 or
  5.0 beta, but could someone please take a look at this?  I would  have
  thought that global JDBC datasources plus auto-deployment is a pretty
  mainstream configuration.

 The following was posted a couple of days ago, and the bug marked as 
RESOLVED
 and FIXED. However, there was also the comment included below which 
seems to
 indicate that the resolution was *not* to place JDBC drivers in the
 common/lib directory, but rather add the JDBC jar to the classpath 
manually.
 
 This is rather confusing. This is a different behavior to Tomcat 4.0.4 
(which
 I'm using now), and is undocuented. Ideally it should be fixed so that 
the
 common/lib directory is used, as is the case with older versions.

No, you're talking about an unrelated issue.  My problem is that 
ResourceLinks (to a globally declared resource) declared in a 
DefaultContext element do not propagate to any automatically deployed 
contexts.  This occurs no matter where the driver jar is located.

Apart from forcing you to explicity configure each context, it also 
makes it much harder to use the ant based deployment tasks - in fact 
I've given up.

I downloaded 5.0.13 as comitters on the list have been describing it as 
stable - but the problem still exists.
You can include a context file with the webapps you deploy (look in the 
docs), which will solve your problem.

BTW, no committer (except me maybe) stated that 5.0.13 was stable. It is 
an alpha release.

Remy



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: DefaultContext + ResourceLink

2003-10-24 Thread Peter Harrison
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 00:54, Remy Maucherat wrote:
  I downloaded 5.0.13 as comitters on the list have been describing it as
  stable - but the problem still exists.

 You can include a context file with the webapps you deploy (look in the
 docs), which will solve your problem.

The problem for me is that in the deployment process we delete the old web 
application and copy in the new webapp. Yes you can include the resources in 
a context - but then you need a custom war for every deployment, rather than 
a generic war which uses whatever data source is defined in server.xml.

In our situation each build is certified, ie we run the war on a test server, 
and that war is certified by the client prior to deployment in the live 
environment.

Anyway, I'm going to stop bleating now and see if I can fx it :)

Regards,

Peter

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: DefaultContext + ResourceLink

2003-10-24 Thread Remy Maucherat
Peter Harrison wrote:

On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 00:54, Remy Maucherat wrote:

I downloaded 5.0.13 as comitters on the list have been describing it as
stable - but the problem still exists.
You can include a context file with the webapps you deploy (look in the
docs), which will solve your problem.


The problem for me is that in the deployment process we delete the old web 
application and copy in the new webapp. Yes you can include the resources in 
a context - but then you need a custom war for every deployment, rather than 
a generic war which uses whatever data source is defined in server.xml.
Well, your generic WAR can contain a /META-INF/context.xml containing 
the ResourceLink.

In our situation each build is certified, ie we run the war on a test server, 
and that war is certified by the client prior to deployment in the live 
environment.

Anyway, I'm going to stop bleating now and see if I can fx it :)
I probably added the support in TC 5. I didn't test, but the patch was a 
bit obvious.

Remy



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


DefaultContext + ResourceLink

2003-10-22 Thread Cam Smith
Hi tomcat-dev,

I just downloaded the latest builds in the hope that this bug might be fixed:

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11662
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16116
Unfortunately it still seems to be present.  I'm happy to go with 4.1 or 
5.0 beta, but could someone please take a look at this?  I would have 
thought that global JDBC datasources plus auto-deployment is a pretty 
mainstream configuration.

thanks,

Cam Smith
Solid State

p:  613 9525 5040
f:   613 9593 8594
m: 0416 150 422
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: DefaultContext + ResourceLink

2003-10-22 Thread Peter Harrison
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:18, Cam Smith wrote:
 Hi tomcat-dev,

 I just downloaded the latest builds in the hope that this bug might be
 fixed:

 http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11662
 http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16116

 Unfortunately it still seems to be present.  I'm happy to go with 4.1 or
 5.0 beta, but could someone please take a look at this?  I would have
 thought that global JDBC datasources plus auto-deployment is a pretty
 mainstream configuration.

The following was posted a couple of days ago, and the bug marked as RESOLVED 
and FIXED. However, there was also the comment included below which seems to 
indicate that the resolution was *not* to place JDBC drivers in the 
common/lib directory, but rather add the JDBC jar to the classpath manually.

This is rather confusing. This is a different behavior to Tomcat 4.0.4 (which 
I'm using now), and is undocuented. Ideally it should be fixed so that the 
common/lib directory is used, as is the case with older versions.


--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-10-20 11:10 ---
I have been dealing with the same problem for a few days and managed to find 
one solution for it.
I'm using Tomcat 4.1.27 and Sybase database running on Win2K(also tried in XP 
and same assembly worked fine).

In my server.xml I have Context under host as follows:

Context path=/MyApp 
 docBase=MyApp
 debug=5 
 reloadable=true 
 crossContext=true   
   Resource name=jdbc/dbref
 auth=Container
 type=javax.sql.DataSource/  
  ResourceParams name=jdbc/dbref
parameter
  namefactory/name
  valueorg.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory/value
/parameter
parameter
  namemaxActive/name
  value10/value
/parameter
parameter
  namemaxIdle/name
  value2/value
/parameter
parameter
  namemaxWait/name
  value1/value
/parameter
parameter
 nameusername/name
 valuereport/value
/parameter
parameter
 namepassword/name
 valuereport/value
/parameter
parameter
   namedriverClassName/name
   valuecom.sybase.jdbc2.jdbc.SybConnectionPoolDataSource/value
/parameter
parameter
  nameurl/name
  valuejdbc:sybase:Tds:xxx:5000/dbname/value
/parameter
parameter
  nameremoveAbandoned/name
  valuetrue/value
  /parameter
  parameter
  nameremoveAbandonedTimeout/name
  value60/value
/parameter
  /ResourceParams
/Context  

In my web.xml I have:

resource-ref
   descriptionSybase Datasource/description
   res-ref-namejdbc/dbref/res-ref-name
   res-typejavax.sql.DataSource/res-type
   res-authContainer/res-auth
/resource-ref

,and in Java:
Context initContext = new InitialContext();
Context envContext  = (Context)initContext.lookup(java:/comp/env);
dataSource = (javax.sql.DataSource)envContext.lookup(dataSourceName);
Connection con = dataSource.getConnection();

I installed Java 2 Runtime Environment 1.4.2_01 and modified system variables:
JAVA_HOME = j2re 1.4.2_01 install dir
CLASSPATH = 3rd party database driver jar directory
CATALINA_HOME = Tomcat install dir

Although Jakarta Tomcat 4.1 JNDI Datasource HOW-TO docs adviced not to 
install 3rd party database drivers anywhere else than in 
$CATALINA_HOME/common/lib I tried adding jar into CLASSPATH and it worked 
fine.
Make sure you have jre installed and JAVA_HOME set into that dir and it should 
work fine.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]