How copyright notices on contributed files should be handled.

2004-12-22 Thread Brian Behlendorf
The below message really should have been sent more widely, it seems. 
The message applies more in the incubator context, where we're getting new 
source code into the ASF in bulk form, but would also apply any time 
you're bringing in new snippets of code under acceptable licenses.  Note 
that if the license on the code you're bringing in doesn't allow for 
inclusion in an ASL 2.0-licensed work (good rule of thumb: it must make no 
demands above and beyond the ASL, so MIT/X/BSD-1.1 is fine; when in any 
doubt, ask) then you must get either a separate acceptable license from 
the copyright holder, or have the copyright holder sign a CLA with the 
ASF.  Note, as described below, *only* the copyright holder has the right 
to remove their own license from the contribution.

Brian
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 14:03:34 -0500
From: Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Reolution of the copyright question
Based upon advice for our counsel, the ASF has today adopted
a policy governing how copyright notices on contributed files
should be handled.
Here's what happens: The following notice gets added to the
top of each source file:
   Copyright [] The Apache Software Foundation or its licensors, as
   applicable.
   Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the License);
   you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
   You may obtain a copy of the License at
   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
   Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
   distributed under the License is distributed on an AS IS BASIS,
   WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
   See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
   limitations under the License.
The contributor may
a) remove any copyright notice it may currently have in the file(s); OR
b) move it to a package-wide COPYRIGHT file, changing 'Copyright []'
   to 'Portions Copyright []'; OR
c) provide permission in writing to the ASF to do one or the other of the
   above.
If the contributor doesn't have a copyright notice in the files, that's
fine; nothing needs be done beyond the adding of the section above.
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist  http://Apache-Server.Com/
Millennium hand and shrimp!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: How copyright notices on contributed files should be handled.

2004-12-22 Thread Davanum Srinivas
fyi


-- Forwarded message --
From: Brian Behlendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 16:36:39 -0800 (PST)
Subject: How copyright notices on contributed files should be handled.
To: tomcat-dev tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]



The below message really should have been sent more widely, it seems.
The message applies more in the incubator context, where we're getting new
source code into the ASF in bulk form, but would also apply any time
you're bringing in new snippets of code under acceptable licenses.  Note
that if the license on the code you're bringing in doesn't allow for
inclusion in an ASL 2.0-licensed work (good rule of thumb: it must make no
demands above and beyond the ASL, so MIT/X/BSD-1.1 is fine; when in any
doubt, ask) then you must get either a separate acceptable license from
the copyright holder, or have the copyright holder sign a CLA with the
ASF.  Note, as described below, *only* the copyright holder has the right
to remove their own license from the contribution.

Brian

-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 14:03:34 -0500
From: Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Reolution of the copyright question

Based upon advice for our counsel, the ASF has today adopted
a policy governing how copyright notices on contributed files
should be handled.

Here's what happens: The following notice gets added to the
top of each source file:

Copyright [] The Apache Software Foundation or its licensors, as
applicable.

Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the License);
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at

http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an AS IS BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.

The contributor may

a) remove any copyright notice it may currently have in the file(s); OR
b) move it to a package-wide COPYRIGHT file, changing 'Copyright []'
to 'Portions Copyright []'; OR
c) provide permission in writing to the ASF to do one or the other of the
above.

If the contributor doesn't have a copyright notice in the files, that's
fine; nothing needs be done beyond the adding of the section above.
--
#kenP-)}

Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist  http://Apache-Server.Com/

Millennium hand and shrimp!



-- 
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]