..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 8:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IIS Connector for TC4.0
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
So, IMO, it's a win-win situation... JK can support all
web-servers and all
old protocols, it's tested, it works, we just need to make
it able to talk
the new AJPv14/WARP protocol and can be used as the strong
foundation.
WebApp will talk only AJPv14/WARP, based on APR, and only
ported to
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, IMO, it's a win-win situation... JK can support all
web-servers and all
old protocols, it's tested, it works, we just need to make
it able to talk
the new AJPv14/WARP protocol and can be used as the strong
foundation.
WebApp will talk only
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
WebApp will talk only AJPv14/WARP, based on APR, and only
ported to Apache
1.3 and 2.0, when we're happy with it, with the 3.3
implementation of
AJPv14/WARP, with the new/revised/corrected APR-based API,
we can start
porting all other stuff over, and in 12 years
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Maybe to you, but buddy Costin doesn't like it... :)
No I'm sure Costin like the merge, and I like
you all comment the following timing :
I like the merge, I don't like the idea of moving all jk features
over to webapp ( and not on the
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Release TC 3.3/4.0
DOH! :)
2) Start to think on how to merge AJP14/WARP
Let me know when
3) Add the AJP14-WARP protocol to mod_jk and mod_webapp (adaptation)
I'll keep track of the protocol modifications in TC4 and WebApp
4) Add APR to
904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 8:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IIS Connector for TC4.0
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Release TC 3.3/4.0
DOH! :)
2) Start to think on how to merge
Hi Gal, Developers,
I'm about to produce a webapp version of the Domino connector for TC4.0,
and I see there isn't an IIS connector. Is anyone working on this? Want
me to take a look?
Bye.
--
Andy Armstrong, Tagish
Andy Armstrong wrote:
Hi Gal, Developers,
I'm about to produce a webapp version of the Domino connector for TC4.0,
and I see there isn't an IIS connector. Is anyone working on this? Want
me to take a look?
(Sorry to follow myself up)
Off-list I've had it explained to me that jk is still
Andy Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Gal, Developers,
I'm about to produce a webapp version of the Domino connector for TC4.0,
and I see there isn't an IIS connector. Is anyone working on this? Want
me to take a look?
No, I'm not yet working on those. I'm actually concentrating on
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Andy Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Gal, Developers,
I'm about to produce a webapp version of the Domino connector for TC4.0,
and I see there isn't an IIS connector. Is anyone working on this? Want
me to take a look?
No, I'm not yet working on those.
Andy Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy Armstrong wrote:
Hi Gal, Developers,
I'm about to produce a webapp version of the Domino connector for TC4.0,
and I see there isn't an IIS connector. Is anyone working on this? Want
me to take a look?
(Sorry to follow myself up)
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Regarding a long-term plan, I heard Costin and Henri talking about
refactorying the JK connector APIs, and using APR, but that actually nothing
is ready yet (correct me if I'm wrong)...
My alleged thought right now goes to a big input in terms of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My view:
It should happen only after 3.3 (and 4.0) is released, switching to APR is
reasonably easy ( IMHO ), adding warp protocol is doable ( but require
some changes in the request representation to use the same struct as the other
jk modules
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Anyway, switching to APR is not that easy (IMO), if you want to take
advantage of ALL which is provided by APR (I'm deprecating ANSI-C here).
This is an incremental process, and can only increase the stability of jk.
Refactoring/cleaning of jk -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
At the same time, since also JK is moving towards APR, but they're far
behind what WebApp does ATM, let's try to refine/update/change the WebApp
API, already based on APR, and work on it as the APR based
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Anyway, switching to APR is not that easy (IMO), if you want to take
advantage of ALL which is provided by APR (I'm deprecating ANSI-C here).
This is an incremental process, and can only increase the
17 matches
Mail list logo