jean-frederic clere wrote:
Bojan Smojver wrote:
Bojan Smojver wrote:
Unfortunately, the problem is still there... Let me run gdb on the thing
again and then I'll send you the backtrace.
Bojan
Slighty different problem this time, but along the lines of the previous
one:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Bojan Smojver wrote:
Bojan Smojver wrote:
Unfortunately, the problem is still there... Let me run gdb on the thing
again and then I'll send you the backtrace.
Bojan
Slighty different problem this time, but along the lines of the previous
one:
Bojan Smojver wrote:
Just a little trivial problem with the new source: it doesn't build
because file common/jk_uri_worker_map.c has an unintentional comment end
(the * after apache) in line 312:
* I have fixed jk_mount_context() in apache*/mod_jk.c so we should
The comment actually
Bojan Smojver wrote:
Bojan Smojver wrote:
Unfortunately, the problem is still there... Let me run gdb on the thing
again and then I'll send you the backtrace.
Bojan
Slighty different problem this time, but along the lines of the previous
one:
DARN, That is the same kind of
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Bojan Smojver wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Bojan Smojver wrote:
Don't want to be a pain in the back side... but (there is always at
least one of those :-), is anyone checking this one out?
I had a peek into the code and that NULL
Bojan Smojver wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Bojan Smojver wrote:
Don't want to be a pain in the back side... but (there is always at
least one of those :-), is anyone checking this one out?
I had a peek into the code and that NULL pointer is a variable called
Bojan Smojver wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Bojan Smojver wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Bojan Smojver wrote:
Don't want to be a pain in the back side... but (there is always at
least one of those :-), is anyone checking this one out?
I had a
Just a little trivial problem with the new source: it doesn't build
because file common/jk_uri_worker_map.c has an unintentional comment end
(the * after apache) in line 312:
* I have fixed jk_mount_context() in apache*/mod_jk.c so we should
The comment actually ends in line 314.
Bojan
Bojan
Unfortunately, the problem is still there... Let me run gdb on the thing
again and then I'll send you the backtrace.
Bojan
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Clere Jean-Frederic FSC EP LP COM 5 wrote:
Bojan Smojver wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Bojan Smojver wrote:
Bojan Smojver wrote:
Unfortunately, the problem is still there... Let me run gdb on the thing
again and then I'll send you the backtrace.
Bojan
Slighty different problem this time, but along the lines of the previous
one:
--
Program received
Don't want to be a pain in the back side... but (there is always at
least one of those :-), is anyone checking this one out?
I had a peek into the code and that NULL pointer is a variable called
'uwr-context'. Don't know much about mod_jk, but this one gets
initialised in the same file, function
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Just realised that the core I have was compiled without -g option. VERY
useful. I also wanted to replicate the core dump with the
httpd that was
compiled with -g, but that didn't work. Now I'm starting to think that
the core file I had was a result of a different crash
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Just realised that the core I have was compiled without -g option. VERY
useful. I also wanted to replicate the core dump with the
httpd that was
compiled with -g, but that didn't work. Now I'm starting to think that
the core file I had was a result of a different crash
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Just realised that the core I have was compiled without -g option. VERY
useful. I also wanted to replicate the core dump with the
httpd that was
compiled with -g, but that didn't work.
What did not work? -It does not core any more?
Now I'm starting to think that
the
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Ask to Apache specialist in new-http list, may be JF Clere could
forward your question to them ?
I'll subscribe to the list and try to find out how it's done. Then
(hopefully) I'll be able to send over something you can work with.
Bojan
jean-frederic clere wrote:
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Just realised that the core I have was compiled without -g option. VERY
useful. I also wanted to replicate the core dump with the
httpd that was
compiled with -g, but that didn't work.
What did not work? -It does not core any more?
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Good information, and could send us a strace ?
This may sound strange to all you Apache experts, but how do I do that?
How do I run strace on a detached process?
strace httpd -f (follow forks)
Thanks for the tip. The log file (bziped) is attached.
Bojan
Bojan Smojver wrote:
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Good information, and could send us a strace ?
This may sound strange to all you Apache experts, but how do I do that?
How do I run strace on a detached process?
strace httpd -f (follow forks)
Thanks for the tip. The log file (bziped)
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Bojan Smojver wrote:
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Good information, and could send us a strace ?
This may sound strange to all you Apache experts, but how do I do that?
How do I run strace on a detached process?
strace httpd -f (follow forks)
Good information, and could send us a strace ?
This may sound strange to all you Apache experts, but how
do I do that?
How do I run strace on a detached process?
strace httpd -f (follow forks)
Thanks for the tip. The log file (bziped) is attached.
I didn't locate the core !
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Good information, and could send us a strace ?
This may sound strange to all you Apache experts, but how
do I do that?
How do I run strace on a detached process?
strace httpd -f (follow forks)
Thanks for the tip. The log file (bziped) is attached.
I
Just realised that the core I have was compiled without -g option. VERY
useful. I also wanted to replicate the core dump with the
httpd that was
compiled with -g, but that didn't work. Now I'm starting to think that
the core file I had was a result of a different crash (I was
experimenting with
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Now I have some new info here. After recompiling everything clean, I've
taken out PHP altogether. So it's not part of the equation. It is
sufficient to compile mod_jk in and use static pages only (ie. no
JSP's/VM at all). If you gracefully restart the server a
number of
Good information, and could send us a strace ?
Just occurred to me that I have the dumped core of Apache when it died.
Would that help you?
May be send a gdb where output ?)
Good information, and could send us a strace ?
This may sound strange to all you Apache experts, but how do I do that?
How do I run strace on a detached process?
strace httpd -f (follow forks)
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I still have to distribute this DSO version of Apache and mod_jk to some
slower machines to see if that makes any difference at all. The machine
that didn't produce any errors is a 1 GHz Athlon, so timing issues could
have been resolved by brute force, who knows...
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Just did a DSO version and couldn't replicate the problem (BTW, I've
recompiled/statically linked Apache and mod_jk again since then and the
problem was still there). So, maybe it has to do with statically linking
Apache after all...
Strange problem. What's the
Bojan Smojver wrote:
As for DSO, I'll have to work on that, so probably some time tomorrow
(Sydney time).
Just did a DSO version and couldn't replicate the problem (BTW, I've
recompiled/statically linked Apache and mod_jk again since then and the
problem was still there). So, maybe it has to
Just did a DSO version and couldn't replicate the problem (BTW, I've
recompiled/statically linked Apache and mod_jk again since then and the
problem was still there). So, maybe it has to do with statically linking
Apache after all...
Strange problem. What's the difference between static and
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Just did a DSO version and couldn't replicate the problem (BTW, I've
recompiled/statically linked Apache and mod_jk again since then and the
problem was still there). So, maybe it has to do with statically linking
Apache after all...
Strange problem. What's the
OOPS! Sorry :-(
jk.conf (called from httpd.conf)
-
###
# Apache JK Configuration
File#
###
31 matches
Mail list logo
