RE: [PATCH] TC 4.0 build patch - not a joke

2001-09-13 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Hi Craig and others in USA, First, I make a point of presenting to you all my condolences for the tragedy which struck the USA, Tuesday last. Henri, I'm not necessarily opposed to this patch -- just want to understand it a little better. Basically, it looks like you are trying to do the

RE: [PATCH] TC 4.0 build patch - not a joke

2001-09-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote: Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 11:44:19 +0200 From: GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [PATCH] TC 4.0 build patch - not a joke Hi Craig and others in USA, First, I make a point of presenting

RE: [PATCH] TC 4.0 build patch - not a joke

2001-09-13 Thread GOMEZ Henri
How does the RPM packaging deal with the fact that different JAR files need to be loaded into different class loaders? If they are all under /usr/share/java, I don't see how that can work. The /usr/share/java is in our case only usefull when building the RPM (.spec file). It's a BuildRequires

RE: [PATCH] TC 4.0 build patch - not a joke

2001-09-11 Thread GOMEZ Henri
PS: The patch is again the current CVS, not the RC1, which is just too late to patch - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6

Re: [PATCH] TC 4.0 build patch - not a joke

2001-09-11 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Henri, I'm not necessarily opposed to this patch -- just want to understand it a little better. Basically, it looks like you are trying to do the following (my comments interspersed in indented paragraphs): * Declare foo.lib properties for all of the actual directories in which the JAR files