Re: [PROPOSAL] "New" version numbering scheme

> Remy, > > Do you have any thougts on the allowable stability tags? > > Projects variously seem to use alpha, beta, RR (restricted release), GA (general > availability), RC (release candidate) and EA (early access). Sometimes they use > 'a' and 'b' instead of alpha and beta - I'd really like to

Re: [PROPOSAL] "New" version numbering scheme

Remy, Do you have any thougts on the allowable stability tags? Projects variously seem to use alpha, beta, RR (restricted release), GA (general availability), RC (release candidate) and EA (early access). Sometimes they use 'a' and 'b' instead of alpha and beta - I'd really like to see docume

Re: [PROPOSAL] "New" version numbering scheme

"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: > >>> De: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>> Enviado el: miércoles 24 de abril de 2002 23:41 >> >> Which will be the rules to advance the build numbers? > > Probably every time the release

Re: [PROPOSAL] "New" version numbering scheme

"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [X] Yes > [ ] No > Big time... -- I think that it's extremely foolish to name a server after the current U.S. President. B.W. Fitzpatrick -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [PROPOSAL] "New" version numbering scheme

> Do not forget to mention that the dev list MUST be informed in advance of the > release (2 or 3 days and better not on Friday). Ok. So, according to the old release plan, a first milestone (4.1.0, instead of being called 4.1 Beta 1) will be released (tagged) this friday. Since it can be difficu

RE: [PROPOSAL] "New" version numbering scheme

>For the uninitiated, the numbering is: >major.minor.build build_stability > >So for example, the first 4.1.x release would probably be numbered: >Apache Tomcat 4.1.0 Alpha > > >[ ] Yes >[ ] No > > >(feel free to provide comments to justify your choice) +1, we have choosen that numbering for mod_

Re: [PROPOSAL] "New" version numbering scheme

Remy Maucherat wrote: >>On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: >> >> De: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: miércoles 24 de abril de 2002 23:41 >>> >>>Which will be the rules to advance the build numbers? >> >>Probably every time the release manager feels the code

Re: [PROPOSAL] "New" version numbering scheme

On Thu, 2002-04-25 at 07:41, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > [X] Yes > [ ] No > I actually like the Linux style, with odd minor numbers for unstable releases and even for stable ones, but this is not bad too. Bojan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands,

Re: [PROPOSAL] "New" version numbering scheme

On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:59:45 -0700 > From: Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [PROPOSA

Re: [PROPOSAL] "New" version numbering scheme

> On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: > > > > De: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Enviado el: miércoles 24 de abril de 2002 23:41 > > > > Which will be the rules to advance the build numbers? > > Probably every time the release manager feels the code is stable and > bette

RE: [PROPOSAL] "New" version numbering scheme

On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: > > De: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Enviado el: miércoles 24 de abril de 2002 23:41 > > Which will be the rules to advance the build numbers? Probably every time the release manager feels the code is stable and better than the pr

Re: [PROPOSAL] "New" version numbering scheme

I like the idea. +1 for me. Amy Remy Maucherat wrote: > Costin has suggested to me in a private email that the Tomcat project could > adopt the Apache 2 numbering scheme (starting with Apache Tomcat 4.1). > I think this is a good idea. > > For the uninitiated, the numbering is: > major.minor.b

Re: [PROPOSAL] "New" version numbering scheme

> Which will be the rules to advance the build numbers? The method in httpd land seems to be once every 1-2 weeks, as long as there are significant changes. Sometimes, one major change (minor security fix or higher priority fix) is enough to cause a build number advance. Remy -- To unsubscribe

RE: [PROPOSAL] "New" version numbering scheme

> De: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: miércoles 24 de abril de 2002 23:41 Which will be the rules to advance the build numbers? Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: