Re: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

Craig R. McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > An immediate prospect would be the JSTL APIs from jakarta-taglibs/standard > (jsr052). Makes sense. And jakarta-taglibs will remain for our Apache non-standard ones, right? > A couple of "devils in the details" questions: > > * Where should CVS

Re: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > jakarta-apis/jsr154/src/java > jakarta-apis/jsr152/src/java +1. Using the jsr numbers may not be explicit enough, though (but it gets the job done, so ...). I have the feeling we're getting somewhere :) Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

on 7/18/02 5:13 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Who gets commit access? This goes beyond Tomcat's committers > once other APIs start getting added. > > Craig That is why I suggested separate repo's. -jon -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For ad

RE: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 17:02:38 -0700 (PDT) > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo'

RE: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

> > jakarta-apis/jsr154/src/java > > jakarta-apis/jsr152/src/java +1 as well. Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

> jakarta-apis/jsr154/src/java > jakarta-apis/jsr152/src/java +1 Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

Jon Scott Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > jakarta-apis/jsr154/src/java > jakarta-apis/jsr152/src/java +1 Pier -- [Perl] combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion of different sublanguages in one monolithic executable. It combines the power of C with the readability o

Re: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

on 7/18/02 4:07 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, what about using the original jakarta-servletapi repository and > creating a subdir for each JSR ? I think it should be renamed... > Or a new jakarta-apis directory and creating one subdir for each JSR ? Sounds good. Mayb

Re: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > > But that's not the reason > > I'm voting against - we already have too many CVS trees and this is > > bad organization, it could be well placed in a single CVS in separate > > directories. > > > > Having a separate CVS for a dozen of files inste

Re: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

on 7/18/02 7:16 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But that's not the reason > I'm voting against - we already have too many CVS trees and this is > bad organization, it could be well placed in a single CVS in separate > directories. > > Having a separate CVS for a dozen of fi

Re: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

on 7/18/02 7:16 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm pretty sure Jon is not proposing this for the benefit of tomcat or > tomcat users, but out of his hate for JSPs. >From my POV, splitting JSP out of Tomcat would benefit Tomcat and Tomcat users. -jon -- To unsubscribe, e-

Re: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

On Fri, 2002-07-19 at 00:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm pretty sure Jon is not proposing this for the benefit of tomcat or > tomcat users, but out of his hate for JSPs. What's wrong with that? ;-)) Bojan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-

RE: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

Quoting "Ignacio J. Ortega" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > De: Jon Scott Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Enviado el: 18 de julio de 2002 1:34 > > > > > [X] I don't want the API's split into separate repo's > > [ ] I don't care > > [ ] I want the API's split into separate repo's. > > > > I do

RE: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

| | [X] I don't want the API's split into separate repo's | [ ] I don't care | [ ] I want the API's split into separate repo's. | TC 4 has too many external module dependencies as it is. Keith -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

> De: Jon Scott Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: 18 de julio de 2002 1:34 > > [X] I don't want the API's split into separate repo's > [ ] I don't care > [ ] I want the API's split into separate repo's. > I dont see why this needs another repo, my only reason is that there are t

Re: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > > >>[X] I don't want the API's split into separate repo's >>[ ] I don't care >>[ ] I want the API's split into separate repo's. > > > I'm pretty sure Jon is not proposing this for the benefit of tomcat or > tomcat user

Re: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > [X] I don't want the API's split into separate repo's > [ ] I don't care > [ ] I want the API's split into separate repo's. I'm pretty sure Jon is not proposing this for the benefit of tomcat or tomcat users, but out of his hate for JSPs. But that

Re: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

"Patrick Luby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oops. The javax.servlet.jsp.* packages have been in jakarta-servlet-4 > for a long time. > > In any case, I tried seeing if this issue could be solved by merely > moving the javax.servlet.jsp.* packages over to the > jakarta-tomcat-jasper repository. U

Re: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > > Therefore, I'm asking for another vote to split the CVS repositories to > represent the split JSR's and adapt the build system of the JSP repository > to have a dependency on the Servlet repository, but not the other way > around. It is ok to also have the JSP build s

RE: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

[ ] I don't want the API's split into separate repo's [ ] I don't care [X] I want the API's split into separate repo's. -jon -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

on 7/17/02 11:35 PM, "Patrick Luby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All, > > Patrick Luby wrote: > >> I tend to agree with Jon on this issue. When I voted for a >> java-servletapi-5 repository, I made the - I think reasonable - >> assumption that the java-servletapi-5 repository would only contain

Re: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > [ ] I don't want the API's split into separate repo's > [ ] I don't care > [X] I want the API's split into separate repo's. It will likely break a few build scripts, but that will be easy to fix. I'm voting to split (actually, I'm more in the "I don't care" item) beca

Re: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

All, Patrick Luby wrote: > I tend to agree with Jon on this issue. When I voted for a > java-servletapi-5 repository, I made the - I think reasonable - > assumption that the java-servletapi-5 repository would only contain the > JSR-154 code. After all, the java-servletapi-4 repository has, f

Re: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > > [ ] I don't want the API's split into separate repo's > [ ] I don't care > [X] I want the API's split into separate repo's. > > -jon > I tend to agree with Jon on this issue. When I voted for a java-servletapi-5 repository, I made the - I think reasonable - assumpt

Re: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 16:34:18 -0700 > From: Jon Scott Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: tomcat-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's > > After JSR053 was formed and

Re: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

Jon Scott Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ ] I don't want the API's split into separate repo's > [ ] I don't care > [X] I want the API's split into separate repo's. Pier -- [Perl] combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion of different sublanguages in one monolithic exe

Re: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > > After JSR053 was formed and dependencies were added to the Servlet API from > the JSP API, it became clear that this was a bad thing. It was ok to have > the JSP API rely on the Servlet API, but not the other way around. The > reason for this is because many people ch