Rob Shaw wrote:
Tomcat 3.1 and 3.2. I haven't run the tests for 4.0.
You will see the same results in 4.0, for the same reasons, on your simple test
cases. However, there is a behavior difference in 4.0 related to the order in
which class loaders are searched for classes -- see my upcoming
Aron Kramlik wrote:
Rob,
This is great information. I wonder if you could explain
why it is that I need to put xml4j.jar file under the $CLASSPATH
(i.e. $TOMCAT_HOME/lib) that is loaded by an init() method of
a servlet?
Which version of Tomcat? There are different issues in each one of
From: Rob Shaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 9:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Class loading classloader visibility test results
Aron,
Based on the stack trace alone it's difficult to debug the problem.
If you want everything to be self contained w
Thanks Craig, more great info.
I am using Tomcat 3.2 Final Release.
I do not see whereI might have the xml.jar file and so I don't
think I am loading the DOM classes from a different .jar file.
Acrtually, this makes sense since I need to put xml4j.jar in
$TOMCAT/lib (under the CLASSPATH) for my
Craig,
I have changed the way that the init() method loads the parser
and parses our XML files and this has fixed the problem.
This is back to using Tomcat 3.2.
Before we were doing this:
private static Parser sXMLParser;
Element root = null;
Document doc;
sXMLParser =
Rob Shaw wrote:
I was unclear as to how Tomcat was resolving class
loading and the visibility of classes to a context's
classloader so I created a simlpe test suite.
That is very helpful and informative (and cool!).
I (and probably others) would like to know, though:
What version of Tomcat
Tomcat 3.1 and 3.2. I haven't run the tests for 4.0.
Thanks for the feedback,
Rob.
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Bucknam" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "Rob Shaw" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: Class
.
Hopefully this helps.
Rob
- Original Message -
From: "Aron Kramlik" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 8:36 PM
Subject: RE: Class loading classloader visibility test results
Rob,
This is great information. I wonder if you could ex
