- Original Message -
From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 12:38 PM
Subject: Re: Fedora "tomcat"
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> >>
> >> Finally - am I overreacting, are other peopl
Costin Manolache wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Finally - am I overreacting, are other people seeing this as a real
issue, or should we just ignore the problem like apache does ?
I would answer no, as the stability issue is a big problem (the HTTPd
doesn't have that issue; why is the worst left to
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Finally - am I overreacting, are other people seeing this as a real
issue, or should we just ignore the problem like apache does ?
I would answer no, as the stability issue is a big problem (the HTTPd
doesn't have that issue; why is the worst left to us ? :/). The
director
Hola,
>Well, I fully agree with you - my preference is also to stick with the
>current layout and provide an RPM that uses this layout.
>
>Both you and Henri suggested Jpackage - which uses the FHS layout I
>described ( i.e. config under /etc - aribrary subdir is ok, etc ).
>Distros like Debian a
Costin Manolache wrote:
I'm fine with using jpackage as the "official" or recommended binary
distribution for RPM-based distributions. This solves part of the problem.
To make sure everyone understand, this will mean we support the
following layout for FHS-based linux systems, in addition to our
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
Finally - am I overreacting, are other people seeing this as a real
issue, or should we just ignore the problem like apache does ?
At the moment, I tend to think yes (we should ignore this problem),
because: we make the same assumptions as httpd regarding the technical
li
Hi,
>Finally - am I overreacting, are other people seeing this as a real
>issue, or should we just ignore the problem like apache does ?
At the moment, I tend to think yes (we should ignore this problem),
because: we make the same assumptions as httpd regarding the technical
literacy / competenc
RPMs, why not point (in docs, or a link
somewhere) to the JPackage.org ones?
http://www.jpackage.org/
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-Original Message-
From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 1:59 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: RE: Fedora &quo
t;Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 10:02 AM
>To: Tomcat Developers List
>Subject: Re: Fedora "tomcat"
>
>Costin Manolache a écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I don't know if you saw it, but Fedora ( the free Redhat distro )
>> includes now tomcat-4.1.27. I think
Costin Manolache a écrit :
Hi,
I don't know if you saw it, but Fedora ( the free Redhat distro )
includes now tomcat-4.1.27. I think this is a big problem and we should
be aware of it - the "tomcat" they distribute uses the worst layout,
doesn't start like any other tomcat, it seem to run out of
atics
>-Original Message-
>From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 1:59 AM
>To: Tomcat Developers List
>Subject: RE: Fedora "tomcat"
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Co
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Costin Manolache
> Sent: May 16, 2004 10:04 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Fedora "tomcat"
>
>
> It's not a "derivative" - it's the same tomcat code, jus
ourse, if you can also make it easier for Fedora to use the official
TC releases, then that would be great too.
I'll go back to lurking now :-)
Steve
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Costin Manolache
Sent: May 16, 2004 5:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj
or Fedora to use the official
TC releases, then that would be great too.
I'll go back to lurking now :-)
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Costin Manolache
> Sent: May 16, 2004 5:14 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Fe
Remy Maucherat wrote:
It is very nice they are bundling java tools and tomcat - but I thing
it is a big problem ( for tomcat developers, fedora users and tomcat
users ) that they distribute such a badly modified tomcat ( and call
it tomcat)
But for a daemon, which is often more complex and ne
Costin Manolache wrote:
Ant actually works quite well, it seem to have a much better startup
time, which is very nice for a tool like ant.
Yes, for Ant, startup time is critical, so native compilation is great.
It is very nice they are bundling java tools and tomcat - but I thing it
is a big prob
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
I don't know if you saw it, but Fedora ( the free Redhat distro )
includes now tomcat-4.1.27. I think this is a big problem and we should
Yes, I saw that FC 2 claims to bundle a lot of Java tools, including
Tomcat.
Ant actually works quite well, it
Costin Manolache wrote:
I don't know if you saw it, but Fedora ( the free Redhat distro )
includes now tomcat-4.1.27. I think this is a big problem and we should
Yes, I saw that FC 2 claims to bundle a lot of Java tools, including Tomcat.
be aware of it - the "tomcat" they distribute uses the wor
18 matches
Mail list logo
