Re: JK2 2.0.0 Release proposal

2002-09-24 Thread Henri Gomez
Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, Since there is no major showstoppers and a) The vhosts should work now b) Socket BUG 12346 is solved Here is the release plan: 1. 09/25/2002 - Freeze the further development. 2. 09/26/2002 - If there is no major bugs tag the release as JK2_2_0_0 3.

Re: JK2 2.0.0 Release proposal

2002-09-24 Thread Costin Manolache
+1 and thanks for steping up :-) Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, Since there is no major showstoppers and a) The vhosts should work now b) Socket BUG 12346 is solved Here is the release plan: 1. 09/25/2002 - Freeze the further development. 2. 09/26/2002 - If there is no major bugs tag

RE: JK2 2.0.0 Release proposal

2002-09-24 Thread Mladen Turk
Contin wrote: Let's call this a 'milestone' or 'build', as is done in 4.x and apache. So JK2_0_BETA as tag name and jk2.0-beta as build name, but I would reather prefer only numbers an just said OK jk-2.0.0 is Beta version. MT. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For

RE: JK2 2.0.0 Release proposal

2002-09-24 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
De: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: 24 de septiembre de 2002 13:28 Hi, Since there is no major showstoppers and a) The vhosts should work now b) Socket BUG 12346 is solved Thanks for volunteer, and thanks for the fixes.. Here is the release plan: +1 for the

RE: JK2 2.0.0 Release proposal

2002-09-24 Thread Costin Manolache
Mladen Turk wrote: Contin wrote: Let's call this a 'milestone' or 'build', as is done in 4.x and apache. So JK2_0_BETA as tag name and jk2.0-beta as build name, but I would reather prefer only numbers an just said OK jk-2.0.0 is Beta version. I think the way it works ( for 4.0 and