I'm impressed ! Did I mentioned that I love working on tomcat ( even
with all the flames and 'issues' and politics ) ?
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Mladen Turk wrote:
I've seen in the JNI aprImpl the JK_DIRECT_BUFFER_NIO flag that is newer
used.
What's missing ( the most ) is a MsgAjp and
Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The most important thing that bothers me is that the java is more then 2
times slower then the GetByteArrayRegion version.
Now, I allway tought that JNI calls imposes serious performance
degradation, but I'm not so sure now.
That was JDK 1.2... We've
-Original Message-
From: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13. lipanj 2002 19:35
To: Tomcat Developers List
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Performance of JNI calls
Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The most important thing that bothers me
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Mladen Turk wrote:
Throughput in rows per second (bigger is better)
JavaRowConsumer 95556
FineGrainedJNIRowConsumer 64360
CoarseGrainedJNIRowConsumer 53946
BytePackedJNIRowConsumer56328
SocketRowConsumer 15635
Now I've changed the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13. lipanj 2002 20:45
To: Mladen Turk
Cc: List Tomcat-Dev
Subject: Re: Performance of JNI calls
Few comments on the code ( first look ):
In many case there is no need to SetByteArrayRegion
