RE: TC 4.0M5 / TC 3.2.1

2000-12-11 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Which can be a good thing if you're using Linux. But if you're doing development on Windows, it's a PITA to take it to your Linux box, and run it through alien so you can put it on your Windows box. I think RPM must/could be used in Unix world but on Windows environnement you must use

Re: TC 4.0M5 / TC 3.2.1

2000-12-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
GOMEZ Henri wrote: Hi, 1) any date for TC 4.0 M5 ? As soon as I can get the Apache connector to compile and run on my Linux system (and understand it enough to explain to others how to configure it, which should be really easy thanks to Pier's hard work :-), I will cut a M5 release --

RE: TC 4.0M5 / TC 3.2.1

2000-12-08 Thread David Rees
If people running AJP13 think that the patches are good ones, I'd say let's go ahead and incorporate them in the "tomcat_32" branch so that they'll be included in 3.2.1. In my setup, I can't even use AJP13 because it randomly returns blank pages, so in IMHO it can't get any worse. ;-) Dan

RE: TC 4.0M5 / TC 3.2.1

2000-12-08 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Unfortunately, the patches are all against a file which doesn't exist in 3.2 (modules/server/Ajp13.java). In 3.2, the relevant file is service/connector/Ajp13Connector.java. So it wouldn't just be a matter of patching. TC 3.3 use a new architecture... If people do like the patches (and no

RE: TC 4.0M5 / TC 3.2.1

2000-12-08 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Is there any way you can make these available in a standard .tar.gz or .zip to save people the hassle of running the .rpms through alien? The RPMS goes a step farther since they prepare installation and remove. Also they take care of dependencies. I hope to see that some Debian packagers will

Re: TC 4.0M5 / TC 3.2.1

2000-12-08 Thread Dan Milstein
Wait -- there's a new patch for the 3.3 code which fixes some of the biggest problems -- I'm doing some testing on that now and will publish it to the list today -- but it's *not* in cvs yet. In particular, David -- I believe I've fixed the problem with Ajp13 randomly getting blank pages, but

RE: TC 4.0M5 / TC 3.2.1

2000-12-08 Thread David Rees
Is there any way you can make these available in a standard .tar.gz or .zip to save people the hassle of running the .rpms through alien? The RPMS goes a step farther since they prepare installation and remove. Also they take care of dependencies. Which can be a good thing if you're using

RE: TC 4.0M5 / TC 3.2.1

2000-12-08 Thread David Rees
If there is around Linux users who want to test the latest TC 3.3 (with the ajp13 patches), just take a look at : http://rpmized.free.fr/ Is there any way you can make these available in a standard .tar.gz or .zip to save people the hassle of running the .rpms through alien? Thanks, -Dave

RE: TC 4.0M5 / TC 3.2.1

2000-12-08 Thread David Rees
-Original Message- From: danmil [mailto:danmil]On Behalf Of Dan Milstein Wait -- there's a new patch for the 3.3 code which fixes some of the biggest problems -- I'm doing some testing on that now and will publish it to the list today -- but it's *not* in cvs yet. In particular,

RE: TC 4.0M5 / TC 3.2.1

2000-12-08 Thread Michael Grinder
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, David Rees wrote: Which can be a good thing if you're using Linux. But if you're doing development on Windows, it's a PITA to take it to your Linux box, and run it through alien so you can put it on your Windows box. You are aware that zips and tgzs are available from

RE: TC 4.0M5 / TC 3.2.1

2000-12-08 Thread David Rees
Not for the version of TC 3.3 rolled from CVS that is on http://rpmized.free.fr/. Of course, what I should do is to use CVS and check out my own tree instead of asking favors of other people. :-) I should've realized this before asking for tarballs. -Dave -Original Message- From:

Re: TC 4.0M5 / TC 3.2.1

2000-12-08 Thread Dan Milstein
2) There is many workspatch done on AJP13 by Dan Milstein but only for TC3.3 AJP13. Will they be included in TC 3.2.1 ? I'm waiting for the patches on TC 3.3 to see how to incorporate in TC 3.2.1 If people running AJP13 think that the patches are good ones, I'd say let's go

RE: TC 4.0M5 / TC 3.2.1

2000-12-08 Thread David Rees
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] My understanding is that Dan is doing a refactoring of AJP13 and he's extending and fixing the protocol. I don't know if that would be a "safe" thing for 3.2.1, most refactoring requires a lot of testing and