On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
why not do iot in shared storage and implement SSI ? thats what the
mod_jserv shm file was for...a shared hunk of disk store.
-Ys-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is certainly one valid approach. It works for
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Jason Brittain wrote:
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
why not do iot in shared storage and implement SSI ? thats what the
mod_jserv shm file was for...a shared hunk of disk store.
-Ys-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is certainly one
[EMAIL PROTECTED] typed the following on 10:35 AM 12/22/2000 +0200
...
Mod_jk on each machine forward requests based on sessionID to the right
tomcat (this is my patch to 3.2b7).
...
THE NEW IDEA is, assuming all of what I have stated above is working. We can
take apache out of the picture.
HOW
Interesting subject, a farm of Apache behind a larger farm of Tomcats ?
Let me develop :
Could we have say a farm of X Apache connected to a farm of Y Tomcat where
Y = 2 * X or Y = 3 * X ?
Also could the session replicator be compatible with eventuals ACL/Crypto
in mod_jk/ajp protocols ?
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two weeks ago I posted note here saying I'm going to write patch for Tomcat
3.2 to support redundancy, in manner of having session information stored
between reloads and shared between tomcat instances.
In order to support tomcat redundancy
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
why not do iot in shared storage and implement SSI ? thats what the
mod_jserv shm file was for...a shared hunk of disk store.
-Ys-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is certainly one valid approach. It works for cases where the servers are all
on the same machine. But you
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
why not do iot in shared storage and implement SSI ? thats what the
mod_jserv shm file was for...a shared hunk of disk store.
-Ys-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is certainly one valid approach. It works for cases where the servers are
Shai,
I apologize for not responding to you earlier ... substantive discussions
are getting a little lost in the noise at the moment.
For some reason, my Netscape mail reader won't let me intersperse comments
-- so I've put them at the end.
I think I read into your earlier comment that you'd be
