Re: TC 3.3 + mod_jk + j_security_check

2001-09-26 Thread cmanolache
On Thu, 27 Sep 2001, Bojan Smojver wrote: > I was referring to the manual configuration, rather then ApacheConfig > one. Some people (me :-) prefer to do things manually. > > I actually tried with /*.jsp (or /*.vm in my case) only and it (still) > doesn't work (which makes sense and I don't consi

Re: TC 3.3 + mod_jk + j_security_check

2001-09-26 Thread Bojan Smojver
lse"), then it outputs all of the > > > defined mappings (including j_security_check for form auth contexts). > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Bojan Smojver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Tomcat Dev List" <[E

Re: TC 3.3 + mod_jk + j_security_check

2001-09-26 Thread Bill Barker
OTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 7:51 PM Subject: Re: TC 3.3 + mod_jk + j_security_check > What if the only mapping is for instance: > > JkMount /*.jsp ajp13 > > Will it still work? > > Bojan > > Bill Barker wrote: >

Re: TC 3.3 + mod_jk + j_security_check

2001-09-25 Thread Bojan Smojver
alse"), then it outputs all of the > defined mappings (including j_security_check for form auth contexts). > - Original Message - > From: "Bojan Smojver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Tomcat Dev List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesda

Re: TC 3.3 + mod_jk + j_security_check

2001-09-25 Thread Bill Barker
om: "Bojan Smojver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Dev List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 5:34 PM Subject: TC 3.3 + mod_jk + j_security_check > Unless this is now implemented automatically in mod_jk, I think it would > be worth ment

TC 3.3 + mod_jk + j_security_check

2001-09-25 Thread Bojan Smojver
Unless this is now implemented automatically in mod_jk, I think it would be worth mentioning in mod_jk HOWTO about the need to JKMount j_security_check when form authentication is used in applications. I think I should be able to fake a paragraph about it (with examples). Bojan