RE: Tagging JK_1_2_8_RC_1 today 18:00 GMT

2004-12-23 Thread ZentraleStudienberatung
, December 23, 2004 8:53 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Tagging JK_1_2_8_RC_1 today 18:00 GMT William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: There are still one potential bug present, reported by Henri Gomez with Tomcat 3.3.2. The other issue is to see the URL rewriting problem reported by Derrick

RE: Tagging JK_1_2_8_RC_1 today 18:00 GMT

2004-12-23 Thread ZentraleStudienberatung
, December 23, 2004 8:53 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Tagging JK_1_2_8_RC_1 today 18:00 GMT William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: There are still one potential bug present, reported by Henri Gomez with Tomcat 3.3.2. The other issue is to see the URL rewriting problem reported by Derrick

Re: Tagging JK_1_2_8_RC_1 today 18:00 GMT

2004-12-23 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 01:52 AM 12/23/2004, Mladen Turk wrote: That's cool, but the handling of in_addr_t is totally bogus and has been for some time. Some platforms declare struct in_addr_t as a typedef - but others don't. The crossplatform solution is to ignore the typedef and use in_addr_t, but instead, the

Re: Tagging JK_1_2_8_RC_1 today 18:00 GMT

2004-12-23 Thread Mladen Turk
ZentraleStudienberatung wrote: Dear Mladen, We have now recognized that you are the absolute computer-superhero and that no one knows the web better than you do. At first mail you said Stop spamming us, or we'll call the police!!! Now, I'm superhero, cool :). But WE (as I told you recently) are

Re: Tagging JK_1_2_8_RC_1 today 18:00 GMT

2004-12-22 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 03:36 AM 12/17/2004, Mladen Turk wrote: The 1.2.7 release has done it's share of work by testing all those new features added. The 1.2.8-rc-1 will add no new features. There are still one potential bug present, reported by Henri Gomez with Tomcat 3.3.2. The other issue is to see the URL

Re: Tagging JK_1_2_8_RC_1 today 18:00 GMT

2004-12-22 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 01:13 AM 12/23/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: At 03:36 AM 12/17/2004, Mladen Turk wrote: The 1.2.8-rc-1 will add no new features. That's cool, but the handling of in_addr_t is totally bogus and has been for some time. Some platforms declare struct in_addr_t as a typedef - but others

[Patch, rev 2] Tagging JK_1_2_8_RC_1 today 18:00 GMT

2004-12-22 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
This is a better patch, it also covers the deprecated code that still exists in the HAVE_APR path. At 01:46 AM 12/23/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: At 01:13 AM 12/23/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: At 03:36 AM 12/17/2004, Mladen Turk wrote: The 1.2.8-rc-1 will add no new features. That's

Re: Tagging JK_1_2_8_RC_1 today 18:00 GMT

2004-12-22 Thread Mladen Turk
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: There are still one potential bug present, reported by Henri Gomez with Tomcat 3.3.2. The other issue is to see the URL rewriting problem reported by Derrick Koes. Since there is the possibility that they are related, I'll leave that for 1.2.8 final. The later one has

Tagging JK_1_2_8_RC_1 today 18:00 GMT

2004-12-17 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi, Just to keep the rhythm of releases :). The 1.2.7 release has done it's share of work by testing all those new features added. The 1.2.8-rc-1 will add no new features. There are still one potential bug present, reported by Henri Gomez with Tomcat 3.3.2. The other issue is to see the URL