Bad news for me and many others since without AJP support included in
2.0.x, users will still require to have mod_jk to link there HTTPD to
Tomcats.
Could we hope the dev team to relax the situation for mod_proxy/ajp in
future 2.0.x release, since Graham, Mladen and Jean-Frederic works
hard to
At 09:25 AM 9/2/2004, Henri Gomez wrote:
Bad news for me and many others since without AJP support included in
2.0.x, users will still require to have mod_jk to link there HTTPD to
Tomcats.
Could we hope the dev team to relax the situation for mod_proxy/ajp in
future 2.0.x release, since Graham,
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Bad news for me and many others since without AJP support included in
2.0.x, users will still require to have mod_jk to link there HTTPD to
Tomcats.
Could we hope the dev team to relax the situation for mod_proxy/ajp in
future 2.0.x release
Admins understand why n.x -
At 12:59 PM 9/2/2004, Mladen Turk wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Could we hope the dev team to relax the situation for mod_proxy/ajp in
future 2.0.x release
[...] please don't expect them
to sympathize when n.x.z - n.x.(z+1) starts breaking things, this
undermines the confidence in one of the
