Re: Tomcat 4 JDBCRealm Connection Pooling

2002-02-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Glenn Nielsen wrote: Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 10:25:07 -0600 From: Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat 4 JDBCRealm Connection Pooling Currently the JDBCRealm does not use db

RE: Tomcat 4 JDBCRealm Connection Pooling

2002-02-13 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
-Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Glenn Nielsen Enviado el: miƩrcoles 13 de febrero de 2002 17:25 Should this support be added to the current JDBCRealm, or should a new realm be created which uses a JNDI named JDBC DataSource? I

Re: Tomcat 4 JDBCRealm Connection Pooling

2002-02-13 Thread Remy Maucherat
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Glenn Nielsen wrote: Hi Glenn, Personally, I like the latter idea better (a new JDBCRealm implementation that uses a JNDI named data source) to avoid disruption of existing applications. Yes, I agree. Internal Catalina components can now use JNDI in the HEAD branch.

Re: Tomcat 4 JDBCRealm Connection Pooling

2002-02-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Glenn Nielsen wrote: Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:53:52 -0600 From: Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tomcat 4 JDBCRealm Connection Pooling Remy Maucherat wrote

Re: Tomcat 4 JDBCRealm Connection Pooling

2002-02-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Glenn Nielsen wrote: [snip] The addition of GlobalNamingResources and the UserDatabase slipped below my radar somehow. I looked at the latest server.xml from CVS. I grep'd the docs in CVS and didn't notice anything in the docs about these yet. The addition of