-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Duncan Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 1/3/01 10:24 PM, "Kevin A. Burton" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why are we using JAXP and ProjectX which are both Closed Source and
proprietary
to SUN Microsystems. This is a Bad Thing. We
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
on 1/3/2001 10:24 PM, "Kevin A. Burton" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ug.
Checked over the archives and didn't see this
Why are we using JAXP and ProjectX which are both Closed Source and
proprietary
James Duncan Davidson wrote:
On 1/3/01 10:24 PM, "Kevin A. Burton" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why are we using JAXP and ProjectX which are both Closed Source and
proprietary
Then why are you using Java which is composed of code most of which isn't
under a free license
There are
James Duncan Davidson wrote:
What I'm saying is that you can redist the jaxp.jar
file containing the classes of the implementation.
That's what we need to be doing in the Apache tree
anyway since we don't have a source redistribution
license.
IMHO, we should have a cleanroom
On 1/8/01 9:31 AM, "Sam Ruby" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO, we should have a cleanroom re-implementation of this important API.
If the current codebase in Apache doesn't meet this criteria, this problem
should be addressed ASAP.
The implementation in the current Xerces tree is a fine clean
On 1/3/01 10:24 PM, "Kevin A. Burton" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why are we using JAXP and ProjectX which are both Closed Source and
proprietary
to SUN Microsystems. This is a Bad Thing. We already have an awesome XML
parser and I would say just *drop* the abstraction... not worth the loss
Kevin Burton wrote:
Ug.
Checked over the archives and didn't see this
Why are we using JAXP and ProjectX which are both Closed Source
and proprietary to SUN Microsystems. This is a Bad Thing. We
already have an awesome XML parser and I would say just *drop*
the abstraction... not worth
Ug.
Checked over the archives and didn't see this
Why are we using JAXP and ProjectX which are both Closed Source and proprietary
to SUN Microsystems. This is a Bad Thing. We already have an awesome XML
parser and I would say just *drop* the abstraction... not worth the loss of
Freedom :(.
--
:wq
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
on 1/3/2001 10:24 PM, "Kevin A. Burton" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ug.
Checked over the archives and didn't see this
Why are we using JAXP and ProjectX which are both Closed Source and
proprietary
to SUN Microsystems. This is a
