Re: bugzilla issue status change..

2001-12-14 Thread Bill Barker
> > I agree. And don't be overly concerned with making a mistake and closing > a report prematurely, since a developer could always reopen it. And the person reporting it will almost certainly reopen it :). > > Thanks for your offer to help! > > > > > Costin > > > > Craig > > > -- > To unsubscri

Re: bugzilla issue status change..

2001-12-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 07:19:22 -0800 (PST) > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: bugzilla issue status chang

Re: bugzilla issue status change..

2001-12-14 Thread costinm
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Martin van den Bemt wrote: > Hi, > > I'm always a bit cautious if not hesitant to change messages in bugzilla, > since I'm not one of the developers. Some issues however I can easily give > an answer to. Should I indeed change the status of those kind of messages, > or just a

bugzilla issue status change..

2001-12-14 Thread Martin van den Bemt
Hi, I'm always a bit cautious if not hesitant to change messages in bugzilla, since I'm not one of the developers. Some issues however I can easily give an answer to. Should I indeed change the status of those kind of messages, or just add my comments and leave it open, for someone with the bigge