Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/config jk.xml project.xml jk2.xml
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:47:59PM +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Tim Funk wrote: > > Does this pretty much says that jk2 is now not recommended? (At least > > until it gets more cleanup) So I can update the FAQ. > > No, this means there's one connector on the Java side, so the number was > useless. > > We could rename that to AJP connector, BTW. I almost did it, but left JK > as the name in the end. > I believe it would be better to use the protocol name (AJP) as the > connector name, so that it is not tied to any native code or another > subproject's name. I can make the change. Please do the rename. I think there is considerable confusion in the community about the status of mod_jk[2], and this name overlap doesn't help. If you spend any time in #tomcat, you'll notice that all the questions are either 1) I'm doing something really dumb and hope everyone here will write my app for me and 2) problems with mod_jk/jk2. And from the mod_jk2 pages, it looks like mod_jk2 is the preferred code. It's clear from lurking tomcat-dev that it isn't. (BTW, lurk #tomcat sometime. It's "educating".) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Some people have a way with words, while others... erm... thingy. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/config jk.xml project.xml jk2.xml
Tim Funk wrote: Does this pretty much says that jk2 is now not recommended? (At least until it gets more cleanup) So I can update the FAQ. No, this means there's one connector on the Java side, so the number was useless. We could rename that to AJP connector, BTW. I almost did it, but left JK as the name in the end. I believe it would be better to use the protocol name (AJP) as the connector name, so that it is not tied to any native code or another subproject's name. I can make the change. Rémy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: remm2003/12/10 04:38:01 Modified:webapps/docs/config project.xml Added: webapps/docs/config jk.xml Removed: webapps/docs/config jk2.xml Log: - Remove confusion: all references to JK 2 are gone, and replaced with JK. This should clear some confusion (hopefully, and we can focus on mod_jk 1 vs mod_jk2). - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/config jk.xml project.xml jk2.xml
Does this pretty much says that jk2 is now not recommended? (At least until it gets more cleanup) So I can update the FAQ. -Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: remm2003/12/10 04:38:01 Modified:webapps/docs/config project.xml Added: webapps/docs/config jk.xml Removed: webapps/docs/config jk2.xml Log: - Remove confusion: all references to JK 2 are gone, and replaced with JK. This should clear some confusion (hopefully, and we can focus on mod_jk 1 vs mod_jk2). - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/config jk.xml project.xml jk2.xml
remm2003/12/10 04:38:01 Modified:webapps/docs/config project.xml Added: webapps/docs/config jk.xml Removed: webapps/docs/config jk2.xml Log: - Remove confusion: all references to JK 2 are gone, and replaced with JK. This should clear some confusion (hopefully, and we can focus on mod_jk 1 vs mod_jk2). Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/config/project.xml Index: project.xml === RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/config/project.xml,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- project.xml 16 Nov 2002 14:59:07 - 1.2 +++ project.xml 10 Dec 2003 12:38:01 - 1.3 @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ - + 1.4 +28 -746 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/config/jk.xml - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
