hgomez 2004/03/17 09:13:32
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c
Log:
Remove unused vars
Revision ChangesPath
1.39 +0 -4 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_worker_lb.c
Index: jk_worker_lb.c
truk2004/03/08 15:01:07
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c
Log:
Fix bug 23483
Only add worker to the workerTable if it is not already there.
Add check for maximum workers too.
Revision ChangesPath
1.38 +21 -5
This account does not exist
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 6:01 PM
Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common
jk_worker_lb.c
truk2004/03/08 15:01:07
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c
Log:
Fix bug 23483
Only add worker
costin 2003/03/03 23:21:00
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c
Log:
Use the new field.
Revision ChangesPath
1.32 +2 -0 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_worker_lb.c
Index: jk_worker_lb.c
mturk 2002/11/21 01:03:18
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c jk_channel_jni.c
jk_channel.c
Log:
Get rid of the one-shot worker initialization scheme.
It doesn't work as it should, and it slows down the load balacer.
Once when service channel will
mturk 2002/10/13 23:30:42
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c
Log:
Check if the worker has lb_disabled flag set, and behave like it was
disabled.
Revision ChangesPath
1.26 +3 -0 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_worker_lb.c
Index:
No, but extending one dtd would be better than reinventing everything.
I will try to make a cleanup as soon as I have time. (docs need a lot of
time).
I confirm ;-)
BTW, any DTD will be fine but we should take a look at what others
jakarta and xml projects are using.
--
To unsubscribe,
Costin Manolache wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
On Behalf Of Costin Manolache
Are we documenting all those settings - and the details on
why/how :-) ?
Sure, like everyone else ;).
Yes, I know :-)
I'll try to get over the horrible and nonstandard DTD that we
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
On Behalf Of Costin Manolache
Are we documenting all those settings - and the details on
why/how :-) ?
Sure, like everyone else ;).
Yes, I know :-)
I'll try to get over the
Costin Manolache wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
On Behalf Of Costin Manolache
Are we documenting all those settings - and the details on
why/how :-) ?
Sure, like everyone else ;).
Yes, I know :-)
I'll try to
jean-frederic clere wrote:
:-) Sorry about 'horrible'.
What I meant is - the elements like section and almost everything
else have an identical meaning as the standard XHTML or docbook element.
It's a mix of elements - to do something that is already done and
standard and accepted.
mturk 2002/10/02 08:36:22
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c
Log:
Introduced 3 new configuration parameters to the lb.
1. attempts -- replaces harcoded MAX_ATTEMPTS
2. recovery -- replaces hardcoded WAIT_BEFORE_RECOVER
3. timeout -- this one is new.
The timeout if
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c
Log:
Introduced 3 new configuration parameters to the lb.
1. attempts -- replaces harcoded MAX_ATTEMPTS
2. recovery -- replaces hardcoded WAIT_BEFORE_RECOVER
3. timeout -- this
De: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: 2 de octubre de 2002 17:50
I there any way to disable completely that timeout?
Perhaps setting it to -1 or something like that?
This timeout disabled should be the default config..
Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega
--
To unsubscribe,
It is disabled by default and never checked (if you don't set the
timeout=x inside the [lb]).
I there any way to disable completely that timeout?
Perhaps setting it to -1 or something like that?
This timeout disabled should be the default config..
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Are we documenting all those settings - and the details on why/how :-) ?
Mladen Turk wrote:
It is disabled by default and never checked (if you don't set the
timeout=x inside the [lb]).
I there any way to disable completely that timeout?
Perhaps setting it to -1 or something like
-Original Message-
On Behalf Of Costin Manolache
Are we documenting all those settings - and the details on
why/how :-) ?
Sure, like everyone else ;).
MT.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
On Behalf Of Costin Manolache
Are we documenting all those settings - and the details on
why/how :-) ?
Sure, like everyone else ;).
Yes, I know :-)
I'll try to get over the horrible and nonstandard DTD that we
use and start
-Original Message-
Sure, like everyone else ;).
Yes, I know :-)
I'll try to get over the horrible and nonstandard DTD that we
use and start documenting what I can still remember, and
anything new that I add. And I won't write any new jk code
until I finish at least
mturk 2002/07/08 06:33:38
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c
Log:
no message
Revision ChangesPath
1.23 +4 -4 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_worker_lb.c
Index: jk_worker_lb.c
mturk 2002/06/29 00:48:20
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c
Log:
Serialize the calls to the workers until the first call finishes or times out.
Added new config param 'timeout' setting the initialization worker
timeout.
Revision ChangesPath
1.21 +88
mturk 2002/06/29 11:28:10
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c
Log:
Move the worker initalization to channel, so we can skip the channels
that not need that option.
Revision ChangesPath
1.22 +6 -13
jfclere 2002/06/22 09:57:54
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c
Log:
Typo
Submitted by: Ian Darwin ian at darwinsys.com
Revision ChangesPath
1.20 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_worker_lb.c
Index: jk_worker_lb.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Bernd Koecke wrote:
Hi Costin,
the new patch seems to work, but I'll test it more exactly tomorrow. Then I'll
create the patches and the functional description.
In short, the patched lb_worker uses an additinal flag on the other workers (e.g
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 13 May 2002, Bernd Koecke wrote:
Sorry, I must say it again, for my environment it is an error, if a _switched
off_ tomcat got a request without a sessionid or with a session from another
node. Its not necessary that this tomact-apache tandem is
In the
The '0' as lb_value is needed to determine which are the
main/local-workers. If
we don't have this special value we need an additional
config-flag with a list
of the local/main-workers like in Mathias patch.
Should I add an additional config-flag (I will take it from
Mathias patch) or do
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
The '0' as lb_value is needed to determine which are the
main/local-workers. If
we don't have this special value we need an additional
config-flag with a list
of the local/main-workers like in Mathias patch.
Should I add an additional config-flag (I will take it from
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Bernd Koecke wrote:
The '0' as lb_value is needed to determine which are the main/local-workers. If
we don't have this special value we need an additional config-flag with a list
of the local/main-workers like in Mathias patch.
Should I add an additional config-flag
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Bernd Koecke wrote:
The '0' as lb_value is needed to determine which are the main/local-workers. If
we don't have this special value we need an additional config-flag with a list
of the local/main-workers like in Mathias patch.
Should I add an
costin 02/05/14 10:23:31
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c
Log:
- Started to add the 'hwBalanceErr' support.
- removed the config stuff - it's now in jk_config
- we still check the shm head and call the config-update method. This
is needed since /jkstatus will
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I'll implement the same thing in jk2, but I wait your patch for jk1.
Hi Costin,
the new patch seems to work, but I'll test it more exactly tomorrow. Then I'll
create the patches and the functional description.
In short, the patched lb_worker uses an
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Bernd Koecke wrote:
Hi Costin,
the new patch seems to work, but I'll test it more exactly tomorrow. Then I'll
create the patches and the functional description.
In short, the patched lb_worker uses an additinal flag on the other workers (e.g
costin 02/05/14 13:41:35
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c
Log:
Support for customizable error message ( or redirect ) in case all
workers are down
Revision ChangesPath
1.15 +28 -3 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_worker_lb.c
Mathias Herberts wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
costin 02/05/09 14:06:48
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c Log: That's the big one.
Please review !
It changes the handling of lb_value to int. I also cleaned up the logic so
it's easier ( I hope ) to understand
On Mon, 13 May 2002, Bernd Koecke wrote:
Sorry, I must say it again, for my environment it is an error, if a _switched
off_ tomcat got a request without a sessionid or with a session from another
node. Its not necessary that this tomact-apache tandem is
In the current code ( in jk2 ), if a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
costin 02/05/09 14:06:48
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c
Log:
That's the big one.
Please review !
It changes the handling of lb_value to int. I also cleaned up the logic so
it's easier ( I hope ) to understand what's
Hi Mathias,
Thanks for the review.
Few comments:
Configure all Apache instances so they see all Tomcat instances, assign
a higher priority to local workers on each Apache, therefore local
What you set is the 'level' ( or proximity, distance, etc ) - lower
numbers mean closer ( and higher
costin 02/05/09 14:06:48
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c
Log:
That's the big one.
Please review !
It changes the handling of lb_value to int. I also cleaned up the logic so
it's easier ( I hope ) to understand what's happening. Levels replace
the 'local
nacho 02/05/04 12:07:53
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c
Log:
* Bug: the worker was lost if only there was 1 worker configured
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +4 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_worker_lb.c
Index: jk_worker_lb.c
costin 02/05/03 10:49:05
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c
Log:
Try to fix the 'default worker' case.
An lbfactor of 0 means the worker is used exclusively ( as long as it's alive).
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +65 -27
costin 02/04/25 12:21:58
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c
Log:
Added some code to check the shm 'version' and update the config.
Not completed.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +173 -97 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_worker_lb.c
costin 02/04/15 16:47:57
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c
Log:
Patch from Eugene Gluzberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If a tomcat goes down, it gets taken out of the worker list for 60
seconds, before its retried. If all the tomcats that are being load balanced
are
costin 02/04/11 17:23:07
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c
Log:
Fix and test the lb worker.
We'll refresh the internal fields every time a new lb worker is added
( it could happen at runtime - until now it was fixed )
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +97
costin 02/03/20 15:39:36
Added: jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c
Removed: jk/native2/common jk_lb_worker.c
Log:
Renamed to follow the same naming scheme with the rest of the code.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
45 matches
Mail list logo
