Re: jk 1.2.6 to be tagged - showstopper

2004-07-23 Thread Henri Gomez
Günter Knauf wrote: Hi, http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/ I've just tried to build on Linux, and it breaks in jki_connect.c on two boxes, SuSE 7.2 and SuSE9, on the first because no in_addr_t, on the second because its defined as struct and not ulong;

Re: jk 1.2.6 to be tagged

2004-07-23 Thread jean-frederic clere
Günter Knauf wrote: Hi, http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/ JFC's portable.h breaks NetWare too; should I now extend the #ifndef like Henry did? I don't see what is wrong: jk/native/common/portable.h should be created from portable.h.in when doing configure. I

Re: jk 1.2.6 to be tagged - showstopper

2004-07-23 Thread jean-frederic clere
Henri Gomez wrote: Günter Knauf wrote: Hi, http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/ I've just tried to build on Linux, and it breaks in jki_connect.c on two boxes, SuSE 7.2 and SuSE9, on the first because no in_addr_t, on the second because its defined as struct and

Re: jk 1.2.6 to be tagged

2004-07-23 Thread Henri Gomez
jean-frederic clere wrote: Günter Knauf wrote: Hi, http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/ JFC's portable.h breaks NetWare too; should I now extend the #ifndef like Henry did? I don't see what is wrong: jk/native/common/portable.h should be created from

RE: jk 1.2.6 to be tagged

2004-07-23 Thread Mladen Turk
jean-frederic clere wrote: JFC's portable.h breaks NetWare too; should I now extend the #ifndef like Henry did? That's the quickest way. The proper would be to have protable.hw and portable.nw (like APR, Apache, etc... have). I don't see what is wrong: jk/native/common/portable.h

Re: jk 1.2.6 to be tagged - showstopper

2004-07-23 Thread Henri Gomez
jean-frederic clere wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: Günter Knauf wrote: Hi, http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/ I've just tried to build on Linux, and it breaks in jki_connect.c on two boxes, SuSE 7.2 and SuSE9, on the first because no in_addr_t, on the second

Re: jk 1.2.6 to be tagged

2004-07-23 Thread Henri Gomez
Günter Knauf wrote: Hi, http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/ JFC's portable.h breaks NetWare too; should I now extend the #ifndef like Henry did? I guess there are probably more platforms which dont have portable.h, so it's perhaps a better approach to do: #ifdef

Re: jk 1.2.6 to be tagged

2004-07-23 Thread jean-frederic clere
Henri Gomez wrote: Günter Knauf wrote: Hi, http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/ JFC's portable.h breaks NetWare too; should I now extend the #ifndef like Henry did? I guess there are probably more platforms which dont have portable.h, so it's perhaps a better

Re: jk 1.2.6 to be tagged - showstopper

2004-07-23 Thread jean-frederic clere
Henri Gomez wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: Günter Knauf wrote: Hi, http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/ I've just tried to build on Linux, and it breaks in jki_connect.c on two boxes, SuSE 7.2 and SuSE9, on the first because no in_addr_t,

Re: jk 1.2.6 to be tagged - showstopper

2004-07-23 Thread Henri Gomez
jean-frederic clere wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: Günter Knauf wrote: Hi, http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/ I've just tried to build on Linux, and it breaks in jki_connect.c on two boxes, SuSE 7.2 and SuSE9, on the

Re: jk 1.2.6 to be tagged

2004-07-23 Thread Henri Gomez
jean-frederic clere wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: Günter Knauf wrote: Hi, http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/ JFC's portable.h breaks NetWare too; should I now extend the #ifndef like Henry did? I guess there are probably more platforms which dont have portable.h,

Re: jk 1.2.6 to be tagged - showstopper

2004-07-23 Thread jean-frederic clere
Henri Gomez wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: Günter Knauf wrote: Hi, http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/ I've just tried to build on Linux, and it breaks in jki_connect.c on two boxes, SuSE

Re: jk 1.2.6 to be tagged - showstopper

2004-07-23 Thread jean-frederic clere
Günter Knauf wrote: Hi, http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/ I've just tried to build on Linux, and it breaks in jki_connect.c on two boxes, SuSE 7.2 and SuSE9, on the first because no in_addr_t, on the second because its defined as struct and not ulong;

Re: jk 1.2.6 to be tagged - showstopper

2004-07-23 Thread Henri Gomez
jean-frederic clere wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: jean-frederic clere wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: Günter Knauf wrote: Hi, http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/ I've just tried to build on Linux, and it breaks in

Re: jk 1.2.6 to be tagged - showstopper

2004-07-23 Thread Günter Knauf
Hi, Adding portable.hnw for netware and portable.hw for windoze and #ifdef for AS400 is the clean way. The quick way is adding: +++ #if !defined(WIN32) !defined(AS400) !defined(NETWARE) #include portable.h #endif +++ unfortunately it isnt that simple cause I have _two_ different

Re: jk 1.2.6 to be tagged - showstopper

2004-07-23 Thread Henri Gomez
Günter Knauf wrote: Hi, Adding portable.hnw for netware and portable.hw for windoze and #ifdef for AS400 is the clean way. The quick way is adding: +++ #if !defined(WIN32) !defined(AS400) !defined(NETWARE) #include portable.h #endif +++ unfortunately it isnt that simple cause I have _two_

Re: jk 1.2.6 to be tagged - showstopper

2004-07-23 Thread Günter Knauf
Hi, I don't get the problems on my 7.2 and 9.0 ;-( hmm, maybe it's a 7.1, or 7.0 box; I will check; but I looked already with man inet_addr and found ulong as return value, and not in_add_t; do we have any chance that configure detects if we have in_addr_t or not? Guenter.

Re: jk 1.2.6 to be tagged - showstopper

2004-07-23 Thread jean-frederic clere
Gnter Knauf wrote: Hi, I don't get the problems on my 7.2 and 9.0 ;-( hmm, maybe it's a 7.1, or 7.0 box; I will check; but I looked already with man inet_addr and found ulong as return value, and not in_add_t; do we have any chance that configure detects if we have in_addr_t or not? Yes, I will

jk 1.2.6 to be tagged

2004-07-22 Thread Henri Gomez
I'll tag jk 1.2.6 by 17h CET. So if you have any showstopper, send me an email :))) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: jk 1.2.6 to be tagged

2004-07-22 Thread Henri Gomez
Henri Gomez wrote: I'll tag jk 1.2.6 by 17h CET. So if you have any showstopper, send me an email :))) JTC tagged as JK_1_2_6 Now back to jk 1.2.7-dev tarball to be released soon. Thanks to various commiters to provide the usual binaries... Regards

Re: jk 1.2.6 to be tagged

2004-07-22 Thread Henri Gomez
Henri Gomez wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: I'll tag jk 1.2.6 by 17h CET. So if you have any showstopper, send me an email :))) JTC tagged as JK_1_2_6 Now back to jk 1.2.7-dev tarball to be released soon. Source tarballs available at :

Re: jk 1.2.6 to be tagged

2004-07-22 Thread Günter Knauf
Hi, http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/ JFC's portable.h breaks NetWare too; should I now extend the #ifndef like Henry did? I guess there are probably more platforms which dont have portable.h, so it's perhaps a better approach to do: #ifdef HAVE_PORTABLE_H

Re: jk 1.2.6 to be tagged

2004-07-22 Thread Günter Knauf
Hi, http://jakarta.apache.org/~hgomez/jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk-1.2.6/ NetWare binaries for Apache 1.3.x, 2.0.x, 2.1-dev, Netscape are available for testing: http://www.gknw.com/test/jtc/ Guenter. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: