there is still things in the pipes which prevent the jk2 2.0.4 release ?
Mladen, Norm, Jean-Fred, Guenter ?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
like this
Did there is still things in the pipes which prevent the jk2 2.0.4
release ?
Mladen, Norm, Jean-Fred, Guenter ?
No. I am now checking old PR's to close them ;-)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
Did there is still things in the pipes which prevent the jk2
2.0.4 release ?
Mladen, Norm, Jean-Fred, Guenter ?
Have you (or pehaps others too) been able to test the new shm
implementation?
MT
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
Did there is still things in the pipes which prevent the jk2
2.0.4 release ?
Mladen, Norm, Jean-Fred, Guenter ?
Have you (or pehaps others too) been able to test the new shm
implementation?
I build it and noticed in init step
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
Did there is still things in the pipes which prevent the jk2
2.0.4 release ?
Mladen, Norm, Jean-Fred, Guenter ?
Have you (or pehaps others too) been able to test the new shm
implementation?
I have a core in linux prefork
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: jk2 2.0.4 release
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
Did there is still things in the pipes which prevent the jk2
2.0.4 release ?
Mladen, Norm, Jean-Fred, Guenter ?
Have you (or pehaps others too) been
From: Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have you (or pehaps others too) been able to test the new shm
implementation?
I've tested it on FreeBSD Apache/2.0.48 prefork. anon is working ok,
but file is not. Looks like I've got a similar problem as Greg. I'm
getting permission errors (httpd runs as
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
Subject: jk2 2.0.4 release
Hi,
We see many bug fixes in the last 2 weeks in jk2, and I
wonder if some of you still have some corrections to commit.
I'm working on a new shm implementation (as said couple of times during last
week
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
We see many bug fixes in the last 2 weeks in jk2, and I wonder if
some of you still have some corrections to commit.
I plan to tag jk2 next Monday morning, and make the release on
monday afternoon.
If nobody object, I'll do like this
+1 as
Good morning Henri.
1. I have tried your recently added style section for the jkstatus page,
and the dab of colour is a nice addition. Application of some more P's and
H? to the output display would make a small refinement to the approach.
However, the notion that one has to recompile the module
Good morning again.
As a PS to my last message, while testing the new changes to Jk2 noted that,
in jk_worker_status.c the qry= option uses a plain/text coding rather than
plain/html, and as a consequence, the recently added STYLE block is shown
at the top of the page... it needs to be moved
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: jk2 2.0.4 release plan
Comments welcome
I can throw some tests at the build given some notice if that is any help.
Thanks for picking this up.
Thanks, we're working with JFC to clean
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: jk2 2.0.4 release plan
Comments welcome
I can throw some tests at the build given some notice if that is any help.
Thanks for picking this up.
Greg
Jess Holle a écrit :
Dave Oxley wrote:
Henri,
What is the current state of JK2. Is it alpha, beta or GA. If this is
going to be an alpha release, what is the plan for a GA release. I
would like to migrate from JK when it is stable.
This is a *very* good question.
Last time I dared to ask
Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Anderson a écrit :
I'll be happy to deliver zips instead of NLMS. for NetWare.
Henri (and others) since we are tagging and releasing jk2 can/should we
do the same for jk since I know there is added functionality
Bill Barker a écrit :
Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Anderson a écrit :
I'll be happy to deliver zips instead of NLMS. for NetWare.
Henri (and others) since we are tagging and releasing jk2 can/should we
do the same for jk since I know there is added
Test
At 01:56 AM 2/4/2004, you wrote:
Bill Barker a écrit :
Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Anderson a écrit :
I'll be happy to deliver zips instead of NLMS. for NetWare.
Henri (and others) since we are tagging and releasing jk2 can/should we
do the
Bill Barker wrote:
Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
Yeah, well, I suppose that now that I'm an all-great-and-powerful PMC
member, I could RM a JK release. However, I'd like to get out a TC 3.3.2
before that (so, if anyone else wants to RM JK in the meantime, you've got
my +1 :).
Bill Barker wrote:
committers as binding votes). In the unlikely event that we get enough
people to care about 3.3 enough to vote (seeing the trouble that Remy has
getting people to vote :)
You're torturing me. I thinnk you should be able to get enough +1s,
though (you, Henri, JF, Larry; that's
Remy Maucherat a écrit :
Bill Barker wrote:
committers as binding votes). In the unlikely event that we get enough
people to care about 3.3 enough to vote (seeing the trouble that Remy has
getting people to vote :)
You're torturing me. I thinnk you should be able to get enough +1s,
though
04, 2004 5:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: jk2 2.0.4 release plan
Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Anderson a écrit :
I'll be happy to deliver zips instead of NLMS. for NetWare.
Henri (and others) since we are tagging
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
Since many people ask for a jk2 release, 2.0.4, I'll act as
release manager if nobody else want to take the job before
Friday.
I'd like to know what are showstoppers (blocking bugs) which
should be fixed in the current release.
Planning :
Up to Friday 6 Feb,
Henri Gomez wrote:
Remy Maucherat a écrit :
Bill Barker wrote:
committers as binding votes). In the unlikely event that we get enough
people to care about 3.3 enough to vote (seeing the trouble that Remy
has getting people to vote :)
You're torturing me. I thinnk you should be able
Hi to all,
Since many people ask for a jk2 release, 2.0.4, I'll act as
release manager if nobody else want to take the job before
Friday.
I'd like to know what are showstoppers (blocking bugs) which
should be fixed in the current release.
Planning :
Up to Friday 6 Feb, determine all bugs which
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
Since many people ask for a jk2 release, 2.0.4, I'll act as
release manager if nobody else want to take the job before
Friday.
I'd like to know what are showstoppers (blocking bugs) which
should be fixed in the current release.
Planning :
Up to Friday 6 Feb,
Hi,
Since many people ask for a jk2 release, 2.0.4, I'll act as
release manager if nobody else want to take the job before
Friday.
great, thanks!
Comments welcome
two things I would like to discuss:
1) I would like to see all binaries packed to tar.gz or zip; this is definitely better
in two
Günter Knauf a écrit :
Hi,
Since many people ask for a jk2 release, 2.0.4, I'll act as
release manager if nobody else want to take the job before
Friday.
great, thanks!
Comments welcome
two things I would like to discuss:
1) I would like to see all binaries packed to tar.gz or zip;
Well it
I'll be happy to deliver zips instead of NLMS. for NetWare.
Henri (and others) since we are tagging and releasing jk2 can/should we
do the same for jk since I know there is added functionality (Ping/Pong
and timeouts) there as well?
Thanks,
Mike Anderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/3/2004 9:27:14 AM
I think Guenter is asking that we change mod_jk2 do be .so. Right now we build a .dll
(at least if we build from the project files) but it would be easy to change this to
.so and I'd be happy to do it.
Mike Anderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/3/2004 9:57:00 AM
Günter Knauf a écrit :
Hi,
Since
Mike Anderson a écrit :
I'll be happy to deliver zips instead of NLMS. for NetWare.
Henri (and others) since we are tagging and releasing jk2 can/should we
do the same for jk since I know there is added functionality (Ping/Pong
and timeouts) there as well?
Well, one release at a time, users urge
Henri,
What is the current state of JK2. Is it alpha, beta or GA. If this is
going to be an alpha release, what is the plan for a GA release. I would
like to migrate from JK when it is stable.
Cheers.
Dave.
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
Since many people ask for a jk2 release, 2.0.4, I'll
Dave Oxley wrote:
Henri,
What is the current state of JK2. Is it alpha, beta or GA. If this is
going to be an alpha release, what is the plan for a GA release. I
would like to migrate from JK when it is stable.
This is a *very* good question.
Last time I dared to ask the consensus was mod_jk
32 matches
Mail list logo
