Re: Re: libjkjni and pcre build

2004-03-10 Thread ax
This account does not exist - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: libjkjni and pcre build

2004-03-10 Thread Kurt Miller
Hi Guenter, Your welcome. ;-) Your email made me realize there no difference between using the ap_pregcomp and ap_regexec functions and the regcomp and regexec functions on platforms that use configure. So I can simplify this a bit more and always use regcomp and regexec when --with-pcre is specif

Re: libjkjni and pcre build

2004-03-10 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi Kurt, thanks for going this way - I have no choice on NetWare since the PCRE functions are not exported at all. Guenter. > I misstated something before. The pcre change is not a problem for > inprocess mode, its a problem for jni out of process mode (i.e. > apr.NativeSo=libjkjni.so). > I thi

Re: libjkjni and pcre build

2004-03-10 Thread Kurt Miller
Embarrassingly replying to myself I misstated something before. The pcre change is not a problem for inprocess mode, its a problem for jni out of process mode (i.e. apr.NativeSo=libjkjni.so). I think the most reasonable solution is to work as follows: --with-pcre and no --with-jni, use apach

libjkjni and pcre build

2004-03-10 Thread Kurt Miller
libjkjni is built when --with-jni is not specified at configure time. When this happens it is not usable, so I'll be changing the build to only build libjkjni when --with-jni is specified. I overlooked one thing with the recent pcre changes I committed. The functions ap_pregcomp and ap_regexec wil