>I'm tempted to say neither HTTPS_KEYSIZE nor
>HTTPS_SECRETKEYSIZE are the
>correct answer..:)
I feel it's HTTPS_KEYSIZE since it's only 56bits.
Serious SSL implemtation like mod_ssl support 128bits :)
nviado el: lunes 17 de septiembre de 2001 18:40
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: Re: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0
>
>
> "Ignacio J. Ortega" wrote:
> >
> > > SPEC 2.3 : SRV.4.7 SSL Attributes
> > >
> > > Nota: the key size and cipher
"Ignacio J. Ortega" wrote:
>
> > SPEC 2.3 : SRV.4.7 SSL Attributes
> >
> > Nota: the key size and cipher suite used are not allways
> > available in web-server (IIS for example)
> >
> >
>
> Regard keysize in IIS, Please check this page below and point me to what
> is key_size for 2.3 spec?
> SPEC 2.3 : SRV.4.7 SSL Attributes
>
> Nota: the key size and cipher suite used are not allways
> available in web-server (IIS for example)
>
>
Regard keysize in IIS, Please check this page below and point me to what
is key_size for 2.3 spec?, HTTPS_KEYSIZE or HTTPS_SECRETKEYSIZE ?
neit
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 10:37:47 +0200
> From: GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: mod_webapp/SSL and TC 4.0
>
> >> It should works at least for Apache 1.
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
> >> I think there a little more missing:
> >> - SSL_CLIENT_CERT_CHAIN_n (n is a number).
>
> >> - The user certificate object stored by mod_jk is a String not a
> >> X509Certificate
>
> >> - I have prepared a patch for it -
> >
> >Patch for WebApp or JK, BTW? I'm starting
>> I think there a little more missing:
>> - SSL_CLIENT_CERT_CHAIN_n (n is a number).
>> - The user certificate object stored by mod_jk is a String not a
>> X509Certificate
>> - I have prepared a patch for it -
>
>Patch for WebApp or JK, BTW? I'm starting to get confused :)
JF talk about mod_jk
"jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>>
>> "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi to all,
>>>
>>> I take a look at mod_webapp and warp java,
>>> and didn't find reference to SSL informations
>>> forwarded from WebServer.
>>>
>>> Should it be fix
"jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>>
It should works at least for Apache 1.3/2.0.
To follow the Servlet 2.3, take a look at
jk in J-T-C since it also handle the SSL_KEY_SIZE.
>>>
>>> Yes, will do... Check out # 3510...
>>
>> You'll have also t
"GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> It should works at least for Apache 1.3/2.0.
>>> To follow the Servlet 2.3, take a look at
>>> jk in J-T-C since it also handle the SSL_KEY_SIZE.
>>
>> Yes, will do... Check out # 3510...
>
> You'll have also to grab other information
> like cipher s
>> +ForwardSSLKeySize
>
>You mean adding a configuration parameter like
>JkForwardSSLKeySize with default
>value Off?
Yes
"jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>>
>> "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi to all,
>>>
>>> I take a look at mod_webapp and warp java,
>>> and didn't find reference to SSL informations
>>> forwarded from WebServer.
>>>
>>> Should it be fix
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
> >> Should we had this attribute to JT also to avoid broke
> >> TC 3.2/3.3 when using mod_jk from JTC ?
> >
> >Would it be possible to ignore this attribute in TC 3.2/3.3?
>
> The problem is that the current ajp13 java implementation
> TC 3.2/3.3 ignore this attribute and w
>> Should we had this attribute to JT also to avoid broke
>> TC 3.2/3.3 when using mod_jk from JTC ?
>
>Would it be possible to ignore this attribute in TC 3.2/3.3?
The problem is that the current ajp13 java implementation
TC 3.2/3.3 ignore this attribute and will fail to decode the
stream and wi
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
> >> About SSL_KEY_SIZE I have just noted I have committed a
> >wrong code... I will
> >> redo the things in some minutes ;-(
> >
> >I had to add SL_A_SSL_KEYSIZE from the apj14 protocol to apj13
> >otherwise we
> >cannot fill "javax.servlet.request.key_size".
>
> Warning, o
>> About SSL_KEY_SIZE I have just noted I have committed a
>wrong code... I will
>> redo the things in some minutes ;-(
>
>I had to add SL_A_SSL_KEYSIZE from the apj14 protocol to apj13
>otherwise we
>cannot fill "javax.servlet.request.key_size".
Warning, original ajp13 didn't support SSL_A_SSL
"Clere, Jean-Frederic" wrote:
>
> GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> >
> > >> It should works at least for Apache 1.3/2.0.
> > >> To follow the Servlet 2.3, take a look at
> > >> jk in J-T-C since it also handle the SSL_KEY_SIZE.
> > >
> > >Yes, will do... Check out # 3510...
> >
> > You'll have also to grab o
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
> >> It should works at least for Apache 1.3/2.0.
> >> To follow the Servlet 2.3, take a look at
> >> jk in J-T-C since it also handle the SSL_KEY_SIZE.
> >
> >Yes, will do... Check out # 3510...
>
> You'll have also to grab other information
> like cipher suite used and bit
>> It should works at least for Apache 1.3/2.0.
>> To follow the Servlet 2.3, take a look at
>> jk in J-T-C since it also handle the SSL_KEY_SIZE.
>
>Yes, will do... Check out # 3510...
You'll have also to grab other information
like cipher suite used and bit size of the algorithm
SPEC 2.3 : SR
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>
> "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi to all,
> >
> > I take a look at mod_webapp and warp java,
> > and didn't find reference to SSL informations
> > forwarded from WebServer.
> >
> > Should it be fixed before release since it
> > may break the spec ?
> >
>
"GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> I take a look at mod_webapp and warp java,
> and didn't find reference to SSL informations
> forwarded from WebServer.
>
> Should it be fixed before release since it
> may break the spec ?
>
> I could grab code from mod_jk to support
>
Hi to all,
I take a look at mod_webapp and warp java,
and didn't find reference to SSL informations
forwarded from WebServer.
Should it be fixed before release since it
may break the spec ?
I could grab code from mod_jk to support
that, but I'm pretty busy with my day work
and mod_jk fixes f
22 matches
Mail list logo
