Re: mod_webapp.so socketpool changes..
Hi, I'm a bit confused about the problem with the use of the APR atomic types. Is the problem that it is not supported on all platforms? If this is the case then isn't this a problem with the apr code? Even if a given OS doesn't specifically offer atomic types then (as menioned earlier) a simple mutex and int in a struct offers the same functionality. As far as I can see, all this wrapping should be part of the apr, shouldn't it? I think puting in #ifdef APR_USE_ATOMICS is a bit of band-aid solution; Whether or not atomics are OS supported the variables in question should really be only operated on atomically (in a multi-threaded environment) or else the code is not thread-safe. Also, I don't know if this has got anything to do with the compilation problems found but when I first put in the atomics I found that the implementation in the (fairly recent) version of the apr I had was broken (on NT) and caused compilation to fail. Getting the latest version fixed this problem. BTW Pier, sorry for not responding earlier - I managed to get the mod_webapp module compiling for Apache 2 after tweaking the 1.3 makefile to get a 2.0 makefile for NT. I used the apr directly from the Apache 2.0 distribution. At the moment I am using Apache 2.0 on an NT intranet server with the mod_webapp at it seems to behave identically to the 1.3 version. PS. If you want me to make any changes modifications (either changing the #ifdef or anything else) to the warp connector just let me know PPS. I noticed a comment about mod_webapp being deprecated. Is this the case? Simon. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pier Fumagalli wrote: Cavan Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Attached is an ASCII file with my build process. It may be important to not that I'm using the APR libraries from the webapp-module-1.0.2-tc402 and apxs from apache 2.0.32 not 2.0.35. You _need_ to use the APR libraries shipped with your Apache 2.0 version, and the same APXS, anyway it's bloated on my system as well. I have some spare time on my hands tonight, and tomorrow... I'll try to revamp the autoconf stuff and make it build again... NOTE I might break something in Win32 builds. Can someone with MSVC give it a go once they see my commits, please? /NOTE Question: when you say Yes, that's right... do you mean yes that's right, the socketpool work may solve bug 8433 or yes that's right, it doesn't compile? The #if APR_HAS_THREADS is wrong that should have been #if APR_HAS_ATOMIC. But APR_HAS_ATOMIC is not existing and it is not possible to force APR to use a generic C code for atomics (apr_force_atomic_generic cannot be set to one via some configure options). Therefore when apr_atomic_t is not defined mod_webapp compilation failed miserably. I will try to change the #if APR_HAS_THREADS into #ifdef USE_ATOMICS like in the mod_mem_cache.c of httpd-2.0. (As a temporary fix). Both... Yeah, the socketpool solves that problem as well (at least it should, what's your worker configuration in Apache 2.0? - output of httpd -l please :) and yes, it doesn't compile... On APR they're talking about removing atomics, since those bits actually depend (especially on sun hardware) on some opcodes present only on V9 architectures (JF might explain it better than me, the only 2 RISCs I've coded for are PPCs and MIPSes), thus making binaries unportable from one architecture to another... The atomic for SPARC is using cas that is an 8+ opcode. This causes problems on SPARC machines with old processors. There is a C code for machines that does not have a as atomic support. Therefore my thought is to rely on inter-process mutex locking, instead of atomics)... Thanks for your time. I feel lucky to have some spare time on my hands :) :) :) Pier -Cavan Morris - Original Message - From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 8:58 AM Subject: Re: mod_webapp.so socketpool changes.. Cavan Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Guys, I reported bug 8433 and am looking for a way to solve it. I thought that the socketpool work you're doing might solve the problem but wasn't able to compile the latest from cvs. My question is do you think that what you're working on could fix the bug? This is a very severe problem on my system. I have to restart both apache and tomcat if I get 2 concurrent requests. If you've got any ideas on the java side I can look into it, but have no idea what to do with the C. Yes, that's right... Can you send out why it doesn't compile? That code uses ATOMIC, but given that atomics are going to go away in a short time from APR, we'll need to change it to use intra-process mutexes... It doesn't compile on OS/X as well... :( Pier -- I think that it's extremely foolish to name a server after
Re: mod_webapp.so socketpool changes..
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm a bit confused about the problem with the use of the APR atomic types. Is the problem that it is not supported on all platforms? No it is not yet supported on all platforms. If this is the case then isn't this a problem with the apr code? Even if a given OS doesn't specifically offer atomic types then (as menioned earlier) a simple mutex and int in a struct offers the same functionality.] Yep, there is an apr_atomic.c file that could be used as generic atomic code. As far as I can see, all this wrapping should be part of the apr, shouldn't it? I think puting in #ifdef APR_USE_ATOMICS is a bit of band-aid solution; Whether or not atomics are OS supported the variables in question should really be only operated on atomically (in a multi-threaded environment) or else the code is not thread-safe. The status of atomic is not 100% clear in APR. Someone from RedHat tells it will not work in user space (at least on Linux)(see http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63643). For mod_webapp probably the best might be to use mutex instead of atomic. Also, I don't know if this has got anything to do with the compilation problems found but when I first put in the atomics I found that the implementation in the (fairly recent) version of the apr I had was broken (on NT) and caused compilation to fail. Getting the latest version fixed this problem. BTW Pier, sorry for not responding earlier - I managed to get the mod_webapp module compiling for Apache 2 after tweaking the 1.3 makefile to get a 2.0 makefile for NT. I used the apr directly from the Apache 2.0 distribution. At the moment I am using Apache 2.0 on an NT intranet server with the mod_webapp at it seems to behave identically to the 1.3 version. PS. If you want me to make any changes modifications (either changing the #ifdef or anything else) to the warp connector just let me know I committed your changes. For the moment I think we should wait to see what happends in APR... PPS. I noticed a comment about mod_webapp being deprecated. Is this the case? No. It is just commented out in the server.xml that is delivered with the TC binaries. Simon. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pier Fumagalli wrote: Cavan Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Attached is an ASCII file with my build process. It may be important to not that I'm using the APR libraries from the webapp-module-1.0.2-tc402 and apxs from apache 2.0.32 not 2.0.35. You _need_ to use the APR libraries shipped with your Apache 2.0 version, and the same APXS, anyway it's bloated on my system as well. I have some spare time on my hands tonight, and tomorrow... I'll try to revamp the autoconf stuff and make it build again... NOTE I might break something in Win32 builds. Can someone with MSVC give it a go once they see my commits, please? /NOTE Question: when you say Yes, that's right... do you mean yes that's right, the socketpool work may solve bug 8433 or yes that's right, it doesn't compile? The #if APR_HAS_THREADS is wrong that should have been #if APR_HAS_ATOMIC. But APR_HAS_ATOMIC is not existing and it is not possible to force APR to use a generic C code for atomics (apr_force_atomic_generic cannot be set to one via some configure options). Therefore when apr_atomic_t is not defined mod_webapp compilation failed miserably. I will try to change the #if APR_HAS_THREADS into #ifdef USE_ATOMICS like in the mod_mem_cache.c of httpd-2.0. (As a temporary fix). Both... Yeah, the socketpool solves that problem as well (at least it should, what's your worker configuration in Apache 2.0? - output of httpd -l please :) and yes, it doesn't compile... On APR they're talking about removing atomics, since those bits actually depend (especially on sun hardware) on some opcodes present only on V9 architectures (JF might explain it better than me, the only 2 RISCs I've coded for are PPCs and MIPSes), thus making binaries unportable from one architecture to another... The atomic for SPARC is using cas that is an 8+ opcode. This causes problems on SPARC machines with old processors. There is a C code for machines that does not have a as atomic support. Therefore my thought is to rely on inter-process mutex locking, instead of atomics)... Thanks for your time. I feel lucky to have some spare time on my hands :) :) :) Pier -Cavan Morris - Original Message - From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 8:58 AM Subject: Re: mod_webapp.so socketpool changes.. Cavan Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Guys, I reported bug 8433 and am looking for a way to solve it. I thought that the socketpool work you're doing might solve the problem but wasn't able
Re: mod_webapp.so socketpool changes..
Pier Fumagalli wrote: Cavan Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Attached is an ASCII file with my build process. It may be important to not that I'm using the APR libraries from the webapp-module-1.0.2-tc402 and apxs from apache 2.0.32 not 2.0.35. You _need_ to use the APR libraries shipped with your Apache 2.0 version, and the same APXS, anyway it's bloated on my system as well. I have some spare time on my hands tonight, and tomorrow... I'll try to revamp the autoconf stuff and make it build again... NOTE I might break something in Win32 builds. Can someone with MSVC give it a go once they see my commits, please? /NOTE Question: when you say Yes, that's right... do you mean yes that's right, the socketpool work may solve bug 8433 or yes that's right, it doesn't compile? The #if APR_HAS_THREADS is wrong that should have been #if APR_HAS_ATOMIC. But APR_HAS_ATOMIC is not existing and it is not possible to force APR to use a generic C code for atomics (apr_force_atomic_generic cannot be set to one via some configure options). Therefore when apr_atomic_t is not defined mod_webapp compilation failed miserably. I will try to change the #if APR_HAS_THREADS into #ifdef USE_ATOMICS like in the mod_mem_cache.c of httpd-2.0. (As a temporary fix). Both... Yeah, the socketpool solves that problem as well (at least it should, what's your worker configuration in Apache 2.0? - output of httpd -l please :) and yes, it doesn't compile... On APR they're talking about removing atomics, since those bits actually depend (especially on sun hardware) on some opcodes present only on V9 architectures (JF might explain it better than me, the only 2 RISCs I've coded for are PPCs and MIPSes), thus making binaries unportable from one architecture to another... The atomic for SPARC is using cas that is an 8+ opcode. This causes problems on SPARC machines with old processors. There is a C code for machines that does not have a as atomic support. Therefore my thought is to rely on inter-process mutex locking, instead of atomics)... Thanks for your time. I feel lucky to have some spare time on my hands :) :) :) Pier -Cavan Morris - Original Message - From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 8:58 AM Subject: Re: mod_webapp.so socketpool changes.. Cavan Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Guys, I reported bug 8433 and am looking for a way to solve it. I thought that the socketpool work you're doing might solve the problem but wasn't able to compile the latest from cvs. My question is do you think that what you're working on could fix the bug? This is a very severe problem on my system. I have to restart both apache and tomcat if I get 2 concurrent requests. If you've got any ideas on the java side I can look into it, but have no idea what to do with the C. Yes, that's right... Can you send out why it doesn't compile? That code uses ATOMIC, but given that atomics are going to go away in a short time from APR, we'll need to change it to use intra-process mutexes... It doesn't compile on OS/X as well... :( Pier -- I think that it's extremely foolish to name a server after the current U.S. President. B.W. Fitzpatrick -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I think that it's extremely foolish to name a server after the current U.S. President. B.W. Fitzpatrick -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_webapp.so socketpool changes..
Cavan Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Guys, I reported bug 8433 and am looking for a way to solve it. I thought that the socketpool work you're doing might solve the problem but wasn't able to compile the latest from cvs. My question is do you think that what you're working on could fix the bug? This is a very severe problem on my system. I have to restart both apache and tomcat if I get 2 concurrent requests. If you've got any ideas on the java side I can look into it, but have no idea what to do with the C. Yes, that's right... Can you send out why it doesn't compile? That code uses ATOMIC, but given that atomics are going to go away in a short time from APR, we'll need to change it to use intra-process mutexes... It doesn't compile on OS/X as well... :( Pier -- I think that it's extremely foolish to name a server after the current U.S. President. B.W. Fitzpatrick -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_webapp.so socketpool changes..
Attached is an ASCII file with my build process. It may be important to not that I'm using the APR libraries from the webapp-module-1.0.2-tc402 and apxs from apache 2.0.32 not 2.0.35. Question: when you say Yes, that's right... do you mean yes that's right, the socketpool work may solve bug 8433 or yes that's right, it doesn't compile? Thanks for your time. -Cavan Morris - Original Message - From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 8:58 AM Subject: Re: mod_webapp.so socketpool changes.. Cavan Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Guys, I reported bug 8433 and am looking for a way to solve it. I thought that the socketpool work you're doing might solve the problem but wasn't able to compile the latest from cvs. My question is do you think that what you're working on could fix the bug? This is a very severe problem on my system. I have to restart both apache and tomcat if I get 2 concurrent requests. If you've got any ideas on the java side I can look into it, but have no idea what to do with the C. Yes, that's right... Can you send out why it doesn't compile? That code uses ATOMIC, but given that atomics are going to go away in a short time from APR, we'll need to change it to use intra-process mutexes... It doesn't compile on OS/X as well... :( Pier -- I think that it's extremely foolish to name a server after the current U.S. President. B.W. Fitzpatrick -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [root@lin1 webapp]# ./support/buildconf.sh --- Cannot run APR buildconf script Don't a forget to download a copy of the APR sources, and to run the buildconf script for it: # cd [path to APR sources] # ./buildconf # cd [path to WebApp sources] Then remember to run ./configure script including the command line option --with-apr=[path to APR sources] --- Creating WebApp configure script Creating configure ... --- All done [root@lin1 webapp]# ./configure --with-apr=~/webapp-module-1.0.2-tc402/apr --with-apxs=/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs creating cache ./config.cache checking for test... /usr/bin/test checking for true... /bin/true checking for echo... /bin/echo checking for grep... /bin/grep checking for cat... /bin/cat checking for sed... /bin/sed checking for ln... /bin/ln checking for rm... /bin/rm checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking for sources directory... /root/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp checking for targets directory... /root/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp C-Language compilation tools checking for ar... /usr/bin/ar checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking for ranlib... ranlib checking for gcc... gcc checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... yes checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) is a cross-compiler... no checking whether we are using GNU C... yes checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes checking for gcc... /usr/bin/gcc checking whether /usr/bin/gcc and cc understand -c and -o together... yes checking how to run the C preprocessor... /usr/bin/gcc -E checking for debug build... no API documentation generation checking for C API documentation... no APR location checking for APR sources... ~/webapp-module-1.0.2-tc402/apr checking for APR libraries... no checking for APR includes... no Target web-server checking for Apache apxs... yes checking target module... apache-2.0 Finishing up checking for APR compilation flags... ok checking for Makefile targets... lib apache-2.0 updating cache ./config.cache creating ./config.status creating ./Makefile creating ./Makedefs creating ./lib/Makefile creating ./apache-2.0/Makefile All done. Now you can issue make. Good luck. [root@lin1 webapp]# make make[1]: Entering directory `/root/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp' make[1]: Entering directory lib make[1]: Invoking make build make[2]: Entering directory `/root/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/lib' make[2]: Generating pr_warp_defs.h from /root/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/warp/Constants.java /usr/local/apache2/build/libtool /usr/bin/gcc -static -g -O2 -g -O2 -pthread -DLINUX=2 -D_REENTRANT -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE -I/usr/local/apache2/include -I/root/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/include -c wa_main.c mkdir .libs /usr/bin/gcc -g -O2 -g -O2 -pthread -DLINUX=2 -D_REENTRANT -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE -I/usr/local/apache2/include -I/root/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/include -c wa_main.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/wa_main.lo /usr/bin/gcc -g -O2 -g -O2 -pthread -DLINUX=2 -D_REENTRANT -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE -I/usr/local/apache2/include -I/root/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/include -c wa_main.c -o wa_main.o /dev/null 21 mv -f .libs/wa_main.lo wa_main.lo /usr/local/apache2/build
Re: mod_webapp.so socketpool changes..
Cavan Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Attached is an ASCII file with my build process. It may be important to not that I'm using the APR libraries from the webapp-module-1.0.2-tc402 and apxs from apache 2.0.32 not 2.0.35. You _need_ to use the APR libraries shipped with your Apache 2.0 version, and the same APXS, anyway it's bloated on my system as well. I have some spare time on my hands tonight, and tomorrow... I'll try to revamp the autoconf stuff and make it build again... NOTE I might break something in Win32 builds. Can someone with MSVC give it a go once they see my commits, please? /NOTE Question: when you say Yes, that's right... do you mean yes that's right, the socketpool work may solve bug 8433 or yes that's right, it doesn't compile? Both... Yeah, the socketpool solves that problem as well (at least it should, what's your worker configuration in Apache 2.0? - output of httpd -l please :) and yes, it doesn't compile... On APR they're talking about removing atomics, since those bits actually depend (especially on sun hardware) on some opcodes present only on V9 architectures (JF might explain it better than me, the only 2 RISCs I've coded for are PPCs and MIPSes), thus making binaries unportable from one architecture to another... Therefore my thought is to rely on inter-process mutex locking, instead of atomics)... Thanks for your time. I feel lucky to have some spare time on my hands :) :) :) Pier -Cavan Morris - Original Message - From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 8:58 AM Subject: Re: mod_webapp.so socketpool changes.. Cavan Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Guys, I reported bug 8433 and am looking for a way to solve it. I thought that the socketpool work you're doing might solve the problem but wasn't able to compile the latest from cvs. My question is do you think that what you're working on could fix the bug? This is a very severe problem on my system. I have to restart both apache and tomcat if I get 2 concurrent requests. If you've got any ideas on the java side I can look into it, but have no idea what to do with the C. Yes, that's right... Can you send out why it doesn't compile? That code uses ATOMIC, but given that atomics are going to go away in a short time from APR, we'll need to change it to use intra-process mutexes... It doesn't compile on OS/X as well... :( Pier -- I think that it's extremely foolish to name a server after the current U.S. President. B.W. Fitzpatrick -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I think that it's extremely foolish to name a server after the current U.S. President. B.W. Fitzpatrick -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_webapp.so socketpool changes..
Well I changed the apr libs I was using and had the same errors. I'm using the Worker MPM. Side Note: I would also like to know why the webapp connector is being deprecated. It may need a little work, but it's ease of configuration is a great feature. I am concerned with it's performance (not knowing anything about it I think it could be a lot better) but the solution to that is to fix it not abandon a beautifully simple interface. BTW: Is there someplace I can get a look at the Warp protocol? -Cavan Morris - Original Message - From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 2:03 PM Subject: Re: mod_webapp.so socketpool changes.. Cavan Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Attached is an ASCII file with my build process. It may be important to not that I'm using the APR libraries from the webapp-module-1.0.2-tc402 and apxs from apache 2.0.32 not 2.0.35. You _need_ to use the APR libraries shipped with your Apache 2.0 version, and the same APXS, anyway it's bloated on my system as well. I have some spare time on my hands tonight, and tomorrow... I'll try to revamp the autoconf stuff and make it build again... NOTE I might break something in Win32 builds. Can someone with MSVC give it a go once they see my commits, please? /NOTE Question: when you say Yes, that's right... do you mean yes that's right, the socketpool work may solve bug 8433 or yes that's right, it doesn't compile? Both... Yeah, the socketpool solves that problem as well (at least it should, what's your worker configuration in Apache 2.0? - output of httpd -l please :) and yes, it doesn't compile... On APR they're talking about removing atomics, since those bits actually depend (especially on sun hardware) on some opcodes present only on V9 architectures (JF might explain it better than me, the only 2 RISCs I've coded for are PPCs and MIPSes), thus making binaries unportable from one architecture to another... Therefore my thought is to rely on inter-process mutex locking, instead of atomics)... Thanks for your time. I feel lucky to have some spare time on my hands :) :) :) Pier -Cavan Morris - Original Message - From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 8:58 AM Subject: Re: mod_webapp.so socketpool changes.. Cavan Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Guys, I reported bug 8433 and am looking for a way to solve it. I thought that the socketpool work you're doing might solve the problem but wasn't able to compile the latest from cvs. My question is do you think that what you're working on could fix the bug? This is a very severe problem on my system. I have to restart both apache and tomcat if I get 2 concurrent requests. If you've got any ideas on the java side I can look into it, but have no idea what to do with the C. Yes, that's right... Can you send out why it doesn't compile? That code uses ATOMIC, but given that atomics are going to go away in a short time from APR, we'll need to change it to use intra-process mutexes... It doesn't compile on OS/X as well... :( Pier -- I think that it's extremely foolish to name a server after the current U.S. President. B.W. Fitzpatrick -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- I think that it's extremely foolish to name a server after the current U.S. President. B.W. Fitzpatrick -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_webapp.so socketpool changes..
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi John-Frederic, I've only just seen your mail as I've been away for a few days... Is there any update on this? Have you had a chance to look at the updates I made? Yep... But it needs more when having a not threaded Apache-1.3 for example. The code still does not compile on my Unixes it needs more #ifdef. I will try to find time for it... If you want me to do any more work on this just let me know... BTW I've been testing this on an NT intranet web server running Apache 1.3.24 and more recently 2.0 and so far it's seems to be stable... Simon. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pier Fumagalli wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, As mentioned in my last email I have updated the socketpool changes to incorporate the changes recommended. I'm not sure if my mail was missed or not but I haven't received any feedback on the latest changes. What's the process to get this code into the codebase? I believe I would need cvs access to commit this (if deemed acceptable) into the source myself. Is this the case? Can someone fill me in Attached are the changes made. Simon, both I and JF have been pretty busy this last few days... I wanted to it out also with Apache 2.0's worker MPM before committing... I have been out for a week... But I will try to find some time today ;-) Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_webapp.so socketpool changes..
Clere, Jean-Frederic wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi John-Frederic, I've only just seen your mail as I've been away for a few days... Is there any update on this? Have you had a chance to look at the updates I made? Yep... But it needs more when having a not threaded Apache-1.3 for example. The code still does not compile on my Unixes it needs more #ifdef. I will try to find time for it... Was not #ifdef but #if (Sorry my bad) I have committed after quickly arranging it so that it compiles and works with Apache-1.3 on Linux, now I will check on the other Unixes and with Apache-2.0. If you want me to do any more work on this just let me know... BTW I've been testing this on an NT intranet web server running Apache 1.3.24 and more recently 2.0 and so far it's seems to be stable... Simon. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pier Fumagalli wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, As mentioned in my last email I have updated the socketpool changes to incorporate the changes recommended. I'm not sure if my mail was missed or not but I haven't received any feedback on the latest changes. What's the process to get this code into the codebase? I believe I would need cvs access to commit this (if deemed acceptable) into the source myself. Is this the case? Can someone fill me in Attached are the changes made. Simon, both I and JF have been pretty busy this last few days... I wanted to it out also with Apache 2.0's worker MPM before committing... I have been out for a week... But I will try to find some time today ;-) Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_webapp.so socketpool changes..
Hey Guys, I reported bug 8433 and am looking for a way to solve it. I thought that the socketpool work you're doing might solve the problem but wasn't able to compile the latest from cvs. My question is do you think that what you're working on could fix the bug? This is a very severe problem on my system. I have to restart both apache and tomcat if I get 2 concurrent requests. If you've got any ideas on the java side I can look into it, but have no idea what to do with the C. Thanks for your time. -Cavan Morris - Original Message - From: jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 6:18 AM Subject: Re: mod_webapp.so socketpool changes.. Clere, Jean-Frederic wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi John-Frederic, I've only just seen your mail as I've been away for a few days... Is there any update on this? Have you had a chance to look at the updates I made? Yep... But it needs more when having a not threaded Apache-1.3 for example. The code still does not compile on my Unixes it needs more #ifdef. I will try to find time for it... Was not #ifdef but #if (Sorry my bad) I have committed after quickly arranging it so that it compiles and works with Apache-1.3 on Linux, now I will check on the other Unixes and with Apache-2.0. If you want me to do any more work on this just let me know... BTW I've been testing this on an NT intranet web server running Apache 1.3.24 and more recently 2.0 and so far it's seems to be stable... Simon. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pier Fumagalli wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, As mentioned in my last email I have updated the socketpool changes to incorporate the changes recommended. I'm not sure if my mail was missed or not but I haven't received any feedback on the latest changes. What's the process to get this code into the codebase? I believe I would need cvs access to commit this (if deemed acceptable) into the source myself. Is this the case? Can someone fill me in Attached are the changes made. Simon, both I and JF have been pretty busy this last few days... I wanted to it out also with Apache 2.0's worker MPM before committing... I have been out for a week... But I will try to find some time today ;-) Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_webapp.so socketpool changes..
jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simon, both I and JF have been pretty busy this last few days... I wanted to it out also with Apache 2.0's worker MPM before committing... I have been out for a week... But I will try to find some time today ;-) Same here, this week was crazy... Hopefully I'll get around to get some time to do some OSS work this week-end... Pier (now with a _real_real_ job) -- I think that it's extremely foolish to name a server after the current U.S. President. B.W. Fitzpatrick -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_webapp.so socketpool changes..
Hi John-Frederic, I've only just seen your mail as I've been away for a few days... Is there any update on this? Have you had a chance to look at the updates I made? If you want me to do any more work on this just let me know... BTW I've been testing this on an NT intranet web server running Apache 1.3.24 and more recently 2.0 and so far it's seems to be stable... Simon. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pier Fumagalli wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, As mentioned in my last email I have updated the socketpool changes to incorporate the changes recommended. I'm not sure if my mail was missed or not but I haven't received any feedback on the latest changes. What's the process to get this code into the codebase? I believe I would need cvs access to commit this (if deemed acceptable) into the source myself. Is this the case? Can someone fill me in Attached are the changes made. Simon, both I and JF have been pretty busy this last few days... I wanted to it out also with Apache 2.0's worker MPM before committing... I have been out for a week... But I will try to find some time today ;-) Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_webapp.so socketpool changes..
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi John-Frederic, I've only just seen your mail as I've been away for a few days... Is there any update on this? Have you had a chance to look at the updates I made? If you want me to do any more work on this just let me know... BTW I've been testing this on an NT intranet web server running Apache 1.3.24 and more recently 2.0 and so far it's seems to be stable... Simon, are you using 2.0 on WinNT as well??? Pier -- I think that it's extremely foolish to name a server after the current U.S. President. B.W. Fitzpatrick -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_webapp.so socketpool changes..
Pier Fumagalli wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, As mentioned in my last email I have updated the socketpool changes to incorporate the changes recommended. I'm not sure if my mail was missed or not but I haven't received any feedback on the latest changes. What's the process to get this code into the codebase? I believe I would need cvs access to commit this (if deemed acceptable) into the source myself. Is this the case? Can someone fill me in Attached are the changes made. Simon, both I and JF have been pretty busy this last few days... I wanted to it out also with Apache 2.0's worker MPM before committing... I have been out for a week... But I will try to find some time today ;-) Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_webapp.so socketpool changes..
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, As mentioned in my last email I have updated the socketpool changes to incorporate the changes recommended. I'm not sure if my mail was missed or not but I haven't received any feedback on the latest changes. What's the process to get this code into the codebase? I believe I would need cvs access to commit this (if deemed acceptable) into the source myself. Is this the case? Can someone fill me in Attached are the changes made. Simon, both I and JF have been pretty busy this last few days... I wanted to it out also with Apache 2.0's worker MPM before committing... Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
