Re: patch: mod_jk load balance algorithm that accounts for current worker load

2005-08-10 Thread Chris Lamprecht
Excellent, I'd love to see this end up in the proxy loadbalancer. I just submitted the patch: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36138 Please do so... There is also some overlap with Apache's proxy load balancer as well, which I would want to fold back in. For example, in

Re: patch: mod_jk load balance algorithm that accounts for current worker load

2005-08-09 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Aug 6, 2005, at 3:48 AM, Chris Lamprecht wrote: We'd like to submit our patch to mod_jk. We've added a new workers.properties lb.method option -- lb.method=B for Busyness, and updated the jkstatus display page accordingly. I wanted to get any feedback or suggestions from the mailing list

patch: mod_jk load balance algorithm that accounts for current worker load

2005-08-06 Thread Chris Lamprecht
mod_jk developers: We have been using mod_jk for some time, (1.2.8, 1.2.10, and now 1.2.14), with Apache 2.0.50, Tomcat 5.5.9, under fedora (2.4.22 kernel). We have 6 tomcats as balanced workers, and we're using lb.method=[R]equest. When load testing our tomcats individually, they can handle

RE: patch: mod_jk load balance algorithm that accounts for current worker load

2005-08-06 Thread Customer Support at www.ballystore.com
Dear Valued Customer, Thank you for contacting Customer Support at www.ballystore.com. Your questions and concerns are important to us and we are dedicated to assisting you in anyway possible. In order to assist you in the most efficient and timely manner, all email correspondence must be

RE: RE: patch: mod_jk load balance algorithm that accounts for current worker load

2005-08-06 Thread Customer Support at www.ballystore.com
Dear Valued Customer, Thank you for contacting Customer Support at www.ballystore.com. Your questions and concerns are important to us and we are dedicated to assisting you in anyway possible. In order to assist you in the most efficient and timely manner, all email correspondence must be

RE: RE: RE: patch: mod_jk load balance algorithm that accounts for current worker load

2005-08-06 Thread Customer Support at www.ballystore.com
Dear Valued Customer, Thank you for contacting Customer Support at www.ballystore.com. Your questions and concerns are important to us and we are dedicated to assisting you in anyway possible. In order to assist you in the most efficient and timely manner, all email correspondence must be

RE: RE: RE: RE: patch: mod_jk load balance algorithm that accounts for current worker load

2005-08-06 Thread Customer Support at www.ballystore.com
Dear Valued Customer, Thank you for contacting Customer Support at www.ballystore.com. Your questions and concerns are important to us and we are dedicated to assisting you in anyway possible. In order to assist you in the most efficient and timely manner, all email correspondence must be

Re: patch: mod_jk load balance algorithm that accounts for current worker load

2005-08-06 Thread Mladen Turk
Chris Lamprecht wrote: mod_jk developers: We have been using mod_jk for some time, (1.2.8, 1.2.10, and now 1.2.14), with Apache 2.0.50, Tomcat 5.5.9, under fedora (2.4.22 kernel). We have 6 tomcats as balanced workers, and we're using lb.method=[R]equest. Great! Can you open an bugzilla