Hi everyone,
I assume there is a BUG in the JSP Code Compiler somewhere, because the
following does not work as it should:
[...]
%
// Retrieve user object for this session
Object obj = request.getSession().getAttribute(user);
// Just make sure, what class we have
the following attachment contains a file with the neccesary patches to the
index.html file which will be used to to make the checkbox and the colors
example work.
the file is in a unix file format.
it was produced using the following command..
cvs diff -u index.html patchindex.txt
using
Unless and until there's a 3.3 or 4.0 final release, *3.2* is the latest
Tomcat release, and deserves to be documented on the web site.
Ah, but that's exactly my point. I see two versions of Tomcat docs up there
now and I'm like, wtf? Why have the 3.3 docs online then? Now that I've
RTFM,
Please unsubscribe me from mailing list.
Thank You
Rob S. wrote:
There is a WHACK of info in that TOC. Your copyright is well-deserved =)
First off, I think we should have an ultra-quick install guide.
Until there's an ultra-quick install script, there can't be a ultra-quick
install guide. For 3.x at least, there are so many different
Christopher Cain wrote:
Rob S. wrote:
[snip]
First off, I think we should have an ultra-quick install guide. If you're
like a lot of geeks, you know your stuff. You need to know a quick few
steps, a quick 2-3 gotchas, and BAM that's it. I want to make sure the
quick-and-dirty
Punky Tse wrote:
3) How about putting all the installation and configuration of Tomcat
standalone first, and then followed by some chapters (advanced topics)
about
Running Tomcat behind web servers?
It's already organized that way. See the first paragraph of the
editorial notes:
I think
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Alex Chaffee wrote:
Bundle the 3.2.x docs with 3.2.x and only have the 3.3 docs online (latest
Tomcat release). If you want the 3.2.x docs, get them with the binary or
whatever. I certainly don't think we should keep old versions of
craigmcc01/07/11 10:35:37
Modified:tester/src/bin tester.xml
Added: tester/web JspParams01.jsp JspParams02.jsp
Log:
Add unit tests to verify that jsp:params is not allowed inside jsp:incluce
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
P.S. What hacker I mean is: The one who read the source code and make
change to it so that the whole system get benefit from it. So you are
hacker. (but me not yet). The guy who break the system is
cracker, or black
hacker to be specific.
??? A cracker is a criminal hacker. not someone
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, John Yu wrote:
I'm new to Tomcat/Jasper. I have a question regarding Jasper:
Does Jasper parse a JSP into a DOM-like objects. In other words, does Jasper
create in-memory parsed tree of the the JSP file?
It does not currently do this. Essentially, Jasper today is
I do stuff like this all the time (although not with scriptlets :-).
The best thing to do would be to create a small, reproducible test case
and then submit it (with a bug report) to our bug tracking system:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Levent Gündogdu wrote:
Hi
horwat 01/07/11 13:17:49
Modified:jasper/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler
TagEndGenerator.java
Log:
Changed to a more meaningful and unique variable name.
Bugzilla #2364
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +2 -2
amyroh 01/07/11 14:15:50
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets
CGIServlet.java
Log:
Fixes the empty content_length problem -- patch submitted by Gene Wadleigh.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +26 -15
remm01/07/11 15:51:43
Modified:jasper/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime
PageContextImpl.java
Log:
- Fix infinite looping bug when doing an include followed by a forward.
The included attribute is now unset before forwarding, so that the JSP we
I like this compromise. I will propose that we get rid of
the 3.2 docs
on the site -- once I'm convinced they're similar enough.
There's still
that old 3.3 is a rogue release sentiment floating around,
and people
might not appreciate giving 3.3 implied legitimacy by making it the
OK, but my point is that as we improve the 3.x docs --
regardless of the
value of x -- the 3.2 docs will become less relevant.
Right now there are many differences between the 3.2 and 3.3 docs, but
they're mostly in the connector docs, which AFAIK haven't
changed much if at
all in
craigmcc01/07/11 16:39:51
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/authenticator
Constants.java FormAuthenticator.java
Log:
Update form-based login processing to be consitent with the 2.3 PFD2 spec.
In particular, Catalina now uses redirects
craigmcc01/07/11 17:00:17
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/authenticator
FormAuthenticator.java
Log:
Remove extraneous debugging output setting.
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +4 -7
P.S. What hacker I mean is: The one who read the source code and make
change to it so that the whole system get benefit from it. So you are
hacker. (but me not yet). The guy who break the system is
cracker, or black
hacker to be specific.
??? A cracker is a criminal hacker. not
craigmcc01/07/11 19:41:02
Modified:tester/src/bin tester.xml
tester/web/WEB-INF web.xml
Added: tester/src/tester/org/apache/tester Include06a.java
Include07.java Include07a.java Include07b.java
Include07c.java
craigmcc01/07/11 19:42:05
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
ApplicationDispatcher.java
Log:
Log a few exceptional conditions in addition to throwing the exceptions
required by the spec.
Revision ChangesPath
1.18 +15 -6
Thanks for the explanation, Craig.
JCCSP is JavaCC grammar based. (See http://home.earthlink.net/~shemnon/ ) Would
there be any opportunity to merge this into Jasper? (While it's currently GPL,
Donno has no problem to place it under BSD.)
regards,
--
John
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, John Yu wrote:
23 matches
Mail list logo
