Ok, now you've got me really confused. It looks like I should have a
single
instance of Processor (and thus a single instance of Adapter). At the
moment, both are per-Thread in tomcat3. But I can't see how this can work
even in o.a.c.tomcat4, since the tomcat4 Adapter uses the same
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3878.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3878.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6978.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7036.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7148.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
larryi 02/03/15 03:34:02
Added: proposals/PasswordPrompter readme
Log:
Add some documentation
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 jakarta-tomcat/proposals/PasswordPrompter/readme
Index: readme
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6978.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
manveen 02/03/15 01:36:05
jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/admin/logger - New directory
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
manveen 02/03/15 01:44:18
Modified:webapps/admin/WEB-INF struts-config.xml
webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin
ApplicationResources_en.properties
ApplicationResources_es.properties Lists.java
Hi All,
Whenever I try to set the parameter clientAuth=true in the server.xml to
accept client certificate from the user, after restarting Tomcat starts up
well, but then I get 'Cannot find server' error when I try to access the
https sites. But the http sites work perfectly.
But when this
Kunal,
This is exactly how the code is supposed to work: the certificate is *not*
fetched from the client if the parameter is set to 'false'.
Patrick
kunal kaviraj wrote:
Hi All,
Whenever I try to set the parameter clientAuth=true in the server.xml to
accept client certificate from the
kunal kaviraj [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Whenever I try to set the parameter clientAuth=true in the server.xml to
accept client certificate from the user, after restarting Tomcat starts up
well, but then I get 'Cannot find server' error when I try to access the
https sites. But the http
tomcat-user question... but:
Can your server reach the CA for the client certificate? AFAICR it must
check the cert is valid..
-Original Message-
From: patrick.luby
Sent: 15 March 2002 17:11
To: tomcat-dev
Cc: patrick.luby
Subject: Re: setting up tomcat to accept client certificate
I would change the name javagroups to be cluster, that way we can make it
pluggable to any underlying layer.
I will have something by the end of next week.
Filip
~
Namaste - I bow to the divine in you
~
Filip Hanik
Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.filip.net
-Original Message-
patrickl02/03/15 10:26:32
Added: webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin/logger
SetUpLoggerAction.java
Log:
Add back source file that was incorrectly removed. Without this file, build will
fail.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +1
Yeah, my mistake was trying to read commit messages when I was in the middle
of doing something else. :-) Just my usual confusion about the 2-state vs.
4-state Lifecycle.
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
craigmcc02/03/15 10:37:42
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/realm JNDIRealm.java
webapps/tomcat-docs/config realm.xml
Log:
Major enhancements to the JNDIRealm implementation. While remaining
backwards compatible with the previous implementation, the
remm02/03/15 11:02:58
Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java
Log:
- Fix a few comments.
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +2 -5
remm02/03/15 11:04:49
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4
CoyoteProcessor.java
Log:
- The session ID parsing code was incorrect (it needed to be adapted over the
old TC 4 code).
Bug reported by Craig.
Revision ChangesPath
remm02/03/15 11:07:36
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote Response.java
coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4
CoyoteResponse.java
Log:
- Add support for expectation.
- Note: This means adding a new method in the HttpResponse
remm02/03/15 11:12:49
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina Response.java
catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector
HttpResponseBase.java
catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
remm02/03/15 12:18:40
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/loader
WebappLoader.java
Log:
- Cosmetic change, to avoid displaying some warnings during stop.
Revision ChangesPath
1.27 +8 -6
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4707.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4707.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5181.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6223.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6279.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7160.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I'd like to release Coyote 1.0 beta 3 soon. Is everyone ok with that ? Bill,
is the timing fine with you ?
I cleaned up the URL decoding with TC 4, which should make the connector as
secure as the old HTTP/1.1 connector was.
I also implemented a few missing features, like:
- HTTP/1.1
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7059.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
The only important thing I need to get in is the start/stop calls on the
Processor. It obviously won't take very long, but I won't be able to get to
it until this evening (PST). None of the other changes affect the 3.3
Adapter.They either just start working (e.g. expectations), or are
Hi,
I have had this problem since around 3.2, (and posted here about it, the
subject was TC 3.3.3 with Apache stack space error
I just installed the tomcat3-3.3.1-rc1.1.noarch.rpm (and the
tomcat-mod-3.3-1.i386.rpm, and other required RPMs),
and I'm still getting this:
-
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7168.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello,
I'm currently investigating the possibility of running
apache-tomcat on more than one machine with session-sharing
between servers. Is it possible to do such a thing or is
there anything like this planned for a future release of
tomcat?
I can imaging that clustering support could be
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7168.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7169.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
jGuru maintains FAQs and Forums on Servlets, JSP, and Tomcat (as well as
many other Java topics). Here is an automated update on recent postings to
Tomcat-related FAQs. Please direct flames and feedback to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
- Alex
++ JavaServer Pages (JSP) FAQ:
billbarker02/03/15 19:29:42
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat3
CoyoteInterceptor.java
Log:
Make certain that the Processor is started and stopped.
This is to stay in line with recent changes in the Http11Processor.
Revision Changes
billbarker02/03/15 19:51:25
Modified:http11 build.xml
Log:
Add the default commons-logging.jar.
This way lazy people (like me) can build without the build.properties file.
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/build.xml
billbarker02/03/15 20:47:30
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat3
CoyoteProcessor.java CoyoteRequest.java
Log:
Fix problem with getRemoteAddr() and getRemoteHost().
Since I'm the only one with a socket, it's not possible to delegate this to
billbarker02/03/15 21:03:03
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat3 CoyoteRequest.java
Log:
Missed one field in the last port.
Now getServerPort is working again as well.
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +1 -0
The 3.3 Adapter is ready for Beta 3, whenever you want to put it together.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
remm02/03/15 21:28:15
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets
DefaultServlet.java
Log:
- Using the URL encoded requestURI can lead to double URL encoding.
Note: Some of the redirects could be avoided. This will be done in a later
The 3.3 Adapter is ready for Beta 3, whenever you want to put it
together.
Thanks Bill.
I'm not totally ready, as I was reimplementing some inefficient algorithms
in the TC 4 adapter (I'm going through them one by one). Now, I still have
to go through some testing.
Remy
--
To unsubscribe,
remm02/03/15 21:31:12
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4
CoyoteProcessor.java
Log:
- Reimplement the URI normalization algorithm using a memory efficient algorithm.
Revision ChangesPath
1.16 +77 -33
remm02/03/15 21:33:53
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4
CoyoteResponse.java
Log:
- The sendRedirect algorithm seemed inefficient (although it worked). I left the
old code commented out in case this causes problems.
Among other
remm02/03/15 21:34:57
Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf ByteChunk.java
Log:
- Fix an off-by-one bug: if the requested string was the last bytes in the chunk,
it wouldn't be found.
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +1 -1
remm02/03/15 22:09:13
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4
CoyoteResponse.java
Log:
- Fix two Watchdog failures.
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +8 -6
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 9:30 PM
Subject: Re: Coyote Beta 3
The 3.3 Adapter is ready for Beta 3, whenever you want to put it
together.
Thanks Bill.
I'm not totally ready,
billbarker02/03/15 22:37:46
Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf ByteChunk.java
Log:
When looking at Remy's change, this caught my eye.
If I'm doing something really stupid here, please -1. util/buf is not one of the
packages I've studied a lot.
Revision
remm02/03/15 22:49:15
Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf CharChunk.java
Log:
- Port Bill's change to CharChunk.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +1 -1
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf/CharChunk.java
Index:
On 16 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
billbarker02/03/15 22:37:46
Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf ByteChunk.java
Log:
When looking at Remy's change, this caught my eye.
If I'm doing something really stupid here, please -1. util/buf is not one of the
billbarker02/03/15 23:29:15
Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf ByteChunk.java
CharChunk.java
Log:
Porting fixes from j-t-c.
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +1 -1
jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf/ByteChunk.java
Just checked in to 3.3.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:03 PM
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf
ByteChunk.java
On 16 Mar
remm02/03/15 23:47:33
Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf ByteChunk.java
Log:
- Port indexOf patch to 3.3. Feel free to -1.
Revision ChangesPath
1.11 +7 -7
jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf/ByteChunk.java
Index:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7170.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7171.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
58 matches
Mail list logo