- Original Message -
From: SomchaiDion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Michael E. Locasto [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tomcat Developers List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2002 10:54 PM
Subject: Re: Symlink problem
Thank you for your information and sorry that I think tomcat-dev can
answer
I am using Tomcat 4.1.3-LE-jdk1.4 with JSDK 1.4.0_01 on Linux(Mandrake 8.1).
And, there is no SecurityException.
I have my user homepage(~lsomchai) setting by Listenner tag in server.xml
file. it has Test subdirectory and the TestSymlink inside it. The
TestSymlink is mount to /mnt/cdrom
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11248.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8459.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10949.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 07:11:51PM +0100, Dev Zero G Ltd wrote:
Without wishing to throw a spanner in the works :) I would like to point
out that we still have not been able to successfully build mod_jk, nor
make it work with the FreeBSD 4.x, Apache 2 and Tomcat 4.0.4 configuration.
Another
This email is autogenerated from the output from:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-07-29/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.html
Buildfile: build.xml
deploy-prepare:
deploy-static:
deploy:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11183.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I've posted this question last week and talked to Remmy, but Remmy is
busy with moving. I spent some time this weekend trying to track down
the bug, but couldn't figure it out. I'm hoping if I describe the bug
more clearly, someone can point me in the right direction.
The bug is the
Hi Peter,
as far as I know, tomcat does the following:
- starting a webapp for each webapp in tomcat/webapps
- starting a webapp for each extra configured webapp from server.xml
My solution was to map the path
/myApp to the ROOT webapp
and the Path
/ to the myApp webapp
Simon Oldeboershuis wrote:
Hi Peter,
as far as I know, tomcat does the following:
- starting a webapp for each webapp in tomcat/webapps
- starting a webapp for each extra configured webapp from server.xml
My solution was to map the path
/myApp to the ROOT webapp
and the
On July 28, 2002 10:32 pm, you wrote:
Does anyone know, how to do auto update of classes
into the JVM? I
tried to write my own custom class loader, and loaded
all the classes
through it, however if I put new updated class, it
won't reload the
class again. Have anyone tried this before?
patrickl2002/07/29 08:54:38
Modified:catalina build.xml
Log:
Update so that jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk will build.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +1 -0 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/build.xml
Index: build.xml
What you describe isn't a bug -- it's a direct consequence of the way
auto-mount works in the appBase directory of a Host (i.e. the webapps
directory).
Normally, Tomcat examines all the contents of the webapps directory, and
(if it's a WAR or a directory) tries to automatically mount a webapp
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9702.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
thanks craig for clarifying that. I'll stick with using symlinks, since
a fix would be a big task.
peter lin
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
What you describe isn't a bug -- it's a direct consequence of the way
auto-mount works in the appBase directory of a Host (i.e. the webapps
directory).
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11043.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Craig - I'm not sure where the current naming conventions
for mbeans are defined in 4.0, and how 'frozen' they are.
This mail is about the first part of the mbean name - the domain.
Curently there are several 'domains' in use:
- catalina - used for most catalina objects ( but not sure how this
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11258.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I'm a bit confused of what's in catalina.mbeans.
My understanding of model mbeans is that we use the modeler
and the xml description - what's the role of all the
classes like LoggerMBean, etc ?
There is also some logic that goes inside the Mbean wrapper
that is very strange - for example
patrickl2002/07/29 11:47:26
Modified:catalina build.xml
Added: catalina/src/bin catalina.properties launcher.properties
launcher.xml
Log:
Integrate Launcher from jakarta-commons-sandbox/daemon into the build. Also, made
patrickl2002/07/29 11:53:03
Modified:.build.properties.default download.properties
Added: .BUILDING.txt
Log:
Create initial build instructions and update versions in property files to match
build instructions.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +9
patrickl2002/07/29 12:04:35
Modified:.BUILDING.txt build.properties.default
Log:
Update earliest build for jakarta-commons-sandbox/daemon since the first build will
be 200020730
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-5/BUILDING.txt
Index:
patrickl2002/07/29 12:06:09
Modified:.BUILDING.txt
Log:
Update earliest build for jakarta-commons-sandbox/daemon since the first build will
be 200020730
Revision ChangesPath
1.33 +3 -3 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/BUILDING.txt
Index: BUILDING.txt
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 10:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: List Tomcat-Dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [5.0 - config] jmx names, part 1: domains
Craig - I'm not sure where the
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 11:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: List Tomcat-Dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: catalina.mbeans package
I'm a bit confused of what's in catalina.mbeans.
luehe 2002/07/29 12:33:07
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java
Log:
Consider the tag directive attribute 'dynamic-attributes' in code generation for tag
files
Revision ChangesPath
1.47 +43 -9
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
I'd focus more on the 5.0 tree to do any major changes, though.
Of course.
Are you talking about the UserDatabase global resource in 4.1? This is
actually a global thing, and not a Realm. See below for more.
I just enabled the Http 'mbean'
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Most of the time, you want MBeans to directly delegate attribute read and
write operations to the corresponding component object. Sometimes,
though, that is not possible (for example, when the component getter takes
an actual object, and the
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 13:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [5.0 - config] jmx names, part 1: domains
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002,
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 13:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: catalina.mbeans package
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Users:type=Role,rolename=admin,database=UserDatabase
Users:type=User,username=both,database=UserDatabase
Users:type=UserDatabase,database=UserDatabase
Yep ... the document only covers the Catalina names at the moment.
In the three you
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
The only place that will prove difficult is when a component's method
implementing an operation wants an object instead of a String or primitive
(say, Container.addChild()). We also have the choice (in Tomcat 5) to
break the existing APIs a
I don't know if you are aware of this ( it is somewhere in a
commit message):
If you add a 'mx.port=' in jk2.properties, jk will
try to load the http adapter of mx4j or jmxri. It will also
expose all the jk handlers as mbeans ( in jk: domain ).
You also need to copy mx4j-tools.jar in
On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 19:49, Simon Stewart wrote:
Another spanner: the default anonymous cvs checkout of the current
mod_jk2 doesn't build on linux. This is because the OS doesn't appear
to get detected properly, meaning that the system dependent jni_md.h
file isn't included in the native
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 14:15:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [5.0 - config] jmx names, part 1: domains
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002,
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 14:18:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: catalina.mbeans package
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 07:39:55AM +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 19:49, Simon Stewart wrote:
Another spanner: the default anonymous cvs checkout of the current
mod_jk2 doesn't build on linux. This is because the OS doesn't appear
to get detected properly, meaning that
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
In the current implementation, the association of webapps to user
databases is *indirect* by virtue of the Realm that is used. You can
share a single user database across webapps, if you want to, in a couple
of different ways:
This is a bit
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
As long as we are using modeler - I think we shouldn't have to write
_any_ custom MBean.
I look forward to seeing how you plan to deal with some of the interesting
cases -- everything from the users MBean attribute on the
luehe 2002/07/29 15:29:01
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler
JspDocumentParser.java Parser.java
ParserController.java
jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/resources
I noticed that there are objects in running Tomcat4.0.4 seen through a
java profiler (OptimizeIt), but did not find it in the source. I wonder
why? Looks like its functionality is about XML parsing. Is it because
they were built into JDSK1.4?
Thanks!
* Zhenxin Wang
* DoCoMo USA
luehe 2002/07/29 16:17:49
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java
Log:
Add AT_BEGIN and NESTED scripting vars to parameter map for body fragment invocation
Revision ChangesPath
1.48 +80 -48
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 15:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [5.0 - config] jmx names, part 1: domains
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002,
patrickl2002/07/29 19:02:12
Removed: catalina/src/bin catalina.properties
Log:
Remove user configuration file as we don't want to overwrite a user's custom
configuration if they upgrade to a newer version.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
My comments on mbean-names.html, and possible improvements for
5.0:
The biggest problem is the representation of load-balanced tomcats.
This is not covered in the current model, and it should ( even
if in most cases the attribute will no be used :-)
In JSR77 terms, we need to add 'node'
bojan 2002/07/29 19:13:05
Modified:jk/native/apache-1.3 mod_jk.c
Log:
Introduce a working ForwardDirectories implementation into mod_jk 1.2.0 for
Apache 1.3.x.
Major changes:
- mod_jk requires mod_dir
- jk_fixups() function introduced
- jk_translate() knows how
Since there were no complaints within 24 hours, I went ahead and committed the
patch. This should bring mod_jk 1.2.0 for Apache 1.3.x in line with mod_jk 1.2.0
for Apache 2.0.x. In other words, ForwardDirectories is not a no-op any more.
I have tested the patch and it does work in my
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
- Each webapp will be associated with one ( or more ) UserDatabases.
A UserDatabase can be used by one or more webapss ( and other
applications).
I think a particular webapp would be associated with only one UserDatabase
(although you
On 29 Jul 2002, Bob Herrmann wrote:
Same should happen for Log, assuming we get the commons-logging
to support JMX and add a wrapper for JDK1.4 ( for log4j
we should just use their mbean ). I assume we all agree on
moving to commons-logging as API, and keeping the old Logging
patrickl2002/07/29 20:57:43
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
Update documentation and comments to reference Tomcat 5, Servlet 2.4, and JSP 2.0
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-5/build.xml
Index: build.xml
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Warning: Off topic !
I'd like to post a quick notice about my current job situation.
As of today, I am no longer an employee of Sun Microsystems, and I am
relocating in France.
Welcome to the family of the now-Europeanized ex-Sun
Same should happen for Log, assuming we get the commons-logging
to support JMX and add a wrapper for JDK1.4 ( for log4j
we should just use their mbean ). I assume we all agree on
moving to commons-logging as API, and keeping the old Logging
interface only for backward compat.
I just
53 matches
Mail list logo
