-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 4:51 AM
/* As per Servlet spec, do exact match first */
match=jk2_uriMap_exactMap( env, uriMap,
ctxEnv-exactMatch, uri, uriLen, reverse );
-if( match !=
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12900.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
mturk 2002/09/22 02:35:46
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c
Log:
Cannot use the hostname:server_port cause the port is 0 for all
host:80 requests. Also is_virtual is used for separating default and
virtual hosts. In case of default server host the hostname provided
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11552.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12900.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
mturk 2002/09/22 02:58:16
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_uriMap.c
Log:
Each host has to be defined in the workers2.properties, so if the
host is provided in the request but non found in the uriMap return
NULL instead using default host (uri:/). Further more I reverted the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12904.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I agree that my patch is buggy in the case of a request coming from 80
or 443, but if we want to support port bases V hosting, we need to pass
it down, if not
[uri:www.something.com:8080/somecontext]
Definitely will not work (this not works now i.e).. so to pass the port
as part of the
Compile error fix for SSLAuthenticator.java and some url fixes for the
servlet examples.
Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
fixes2.diff
Description: Binary data
fixes3.diff
Description: Binary data
fixes.diff
Description: Binary data
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
JDK 1.4's javac doesn't like this. It's complaining about casting Object to
X509Certificate[].
On Saturday 21 September 2002 02:50 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
billbarker2002/09/20 23:50:30
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/authenticator
billbarker2002/09/22 17:12:26
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4 Constants.java
CoyoteRequest.java
Log:
Porting SSL-auth fix from Tomcat5.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +5 -0
billbarker2002/09/22 17:16:35
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina Globals.java
catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/authenticator
SSLAuthenticator.java
Log:
Port SSL-auth fix from the 5.0 branch.
Revision ChangesPath
billbarker2002/09/22 17:24:32
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/authenticator
SSLAuthenticator.java
Log:
Fix class-cast problem with previous patch.
Submitted By: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +6 -5
billbarker2002/09/22 17:25:10
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/authenticator
SSLAuthenticator.java
Log:
Port cast fix from 5.0 branch.
Revision ChangesPath
1.13 +6 -5
I know, I know, compile then commit :-(.
Fixed now.
- Original Message -
From: Steve Downey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 12:48 PM
Subject: [PATCH][5] Re: cvs commit:
billbarker2002/09/22 17:32:46
Modified:.RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
Log:
Document SSL-auth fix.
Revision ChangesPath
1.21 +2 -1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
Index: RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
What's so bad about requiring the user to specify a port for all mappings
with a virtual host in workers2.properties ? You may be able to support one
default port (80 or 443), but not both without adding additional config
options in worker2.properties - or am I wrong ?
Although r-server-port may
-Original Message-
From: Ignacio J. Ortega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I agree that my patch is buggy in the case of a request
coming from 80 or 443, but if we want to support port bases V
hosting, we need to pass it down, if not
[uri:www.something.com:8080/somecontext]
18 matches
Mail list logo